2022
PD-L1 protein expression in relation to recurrence score values in early-stage ER + breast cancer
Rozenblit M, Blenman K, Harigopal M, Reisenbichler E, Singh K, Qing T, Ibrahim E, Ramkissoon S, Asmelash S, Lin HK, Roberts M, Ross J, Huang RSP, Pusztai L. PD-L1 protein expression in relation to recurrence score values in early-stage ER + breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research And Treatment 2022, 196: 221-227. PMID: 36028784, DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06712-2.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPD-L1 positivityPD-L1 protein expressionPD-L1 expressionGrade 3 cancersPD-L1TIL scoreTumor gradeMultivariate analysisHigher PD-L1 positivityTumor-infiltrating lymphocyte countsConclusionPD-L1 expressionProtein expressionPD-L1 immunohistochemistryChi-square testResultsPD-L1T1 cancersLymphocyte countT3 tumorsIndependent predictorsTumor sizeLarge tumorsPositivity rateCell positivityBreast cancerGrade 2
2013
A 3-gene proliferation score (TOP-FOX-67) can re-classify histological grade-2, ER-positive breast cancers into low- and high-risk prognostic categories
Szekely B, Iwamoto T, Szasz AM, Qi Y, Matsuoka J, Symmans WF, Tokes AM, Kulka J, Swanton C, Pusztai L. A 3-gene proliferation score (TOP-FOX-67) can re-classify histological grade-2, ER-positive breast cancers into low- and high-risk prognostic categories. Breast Cancer Research And Treatment 2013, 138: 691-698. PMID: 23504136, DOI: 10.1007/s10549-013-2475-4.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAntigens, NeoplasmBreast NeoplasmsCell ProliferationChemotherapy, AdjuvantCohort StudiesDatabases, GeneticDNA Topoisomerases, Type IIDNA-Binding ProteinsFemaleForkhead Box Protein M1Forkhead Transcription FactorsGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenome, HumanHumansKi-67 AntigenPoly-ADP-Ribose Binding ProteinsPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisReceptors, EstrogenSurvival RateTamoxifenConceptsGenomic grade indexGrade 2 cancersPrognostic valueProliferation scoreBreast cancerDistant metastasis-free survival curvesGrade 2Metastasis-free survival curvesER-positive breast cancerSystemic adjuvant therapyHigh expressionCohort of patientsHistological grade 2Intermediate-risk cancerPositive breast cancerSimilar prognostic valueGrade 2 tumorsHigh-risk groupGrade 1 cancersHistological grade groupsNon-significant trendWorse DMFSAdjuvant tamoxifenAdjuvant therapyWorse survival
2003
Phase I and II study of exisulind in combination with capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer.
Pusztai L, Zhen JH, Arun B, Rivera E, Whitehead C, Thompson WJ, Nealy KM, Gibbs A, Symmans WF, Esteva FJ, Booser D, Murray JL, Valero V, Smith TL, Hortobagyi GN. Phase I and II study of exisulind in combination with capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2003, 21: 3454-61. PMID: 12972520, DOI: 10.1200/jco.2003.02.114.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH Keywords3',5'-Cyclic-GMP PhosphodiesterasesAdultAgedAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsCapecitabineCyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases, Type 2Cyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases, Type 5DeoxycytidineFemaleFluorouracilHumansImmunohistochemistryMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisPhosphoric Diester HydrolasesProdrugsSulindacConceptsMetastatic breast cancerHand-foot syndromeAdverse eventsBreast cancerGrade 2Strong stainingPhase IContinuous daily therapyFrequent grade 2Dose-limiting toxicityOverall clinical benefitPercent of tumorsUnexpected adverse eventsPhase II testingBID dosePrevious anthracyclineStable diseaseDaily therapyTaxane chemotherapyLaboratory abnormalitiesMedian durationPartial responseClinical benefitTumor responseImmunohistochemical assessment
1998
Daily Oral Etoposide in Patients With Heavily Pretreated Metastatic Breast Cancer
Pusztai L, Walters R, Valero V, Theriault R, Hortobagyi G. Daily Oral Etoposide in Patients With Heavily Pretreated Metastatic Breast Cancer. American Journal Of Clinical Oncology 1998, 21: 442-446. PMID: 9781596, DOI: 10.1097/00000421-199810000-00004.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsGrade 4 toxicityMetastatic breast cancerSignificant hematologic toxicityOral etoposideBreast cancerGrade 2Hematologic toxicityDaily oral etoposideFourth-line agentZubrod performance statusPercent of patientsPhase II studyMajority of patientsGreater thrombocytopeniaNeutropenic feverStable diseasePrevious therapyRadiologic evidenceII studyMedian durationPartial responsePerformance statusMedian ageMore regimensSevere anemia