2023
Therapeutic value of first versus supplemental indications of drugs in US and Europe (2011-20): retrospective cohort study
Vokinger K, Glaus C, Kesselheim A, Serra-Burriel M, Ross J, Hwang T. Therapeutic value of first versus supplemental indications of drugs in US and Europe (2011-20): retrospective cohort study. The BMJ 2023, 382: e074166. PMID: 37407074, PMCID: PMC10320829, DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2022-074166.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsEuropean Medicines AgencyRetrospective cohort studyCohort studyTherapeutic valueSupplemental indicationsIndication approvalsHigh therapeutic valueAvailable treatmentsDrug AdministrationUS FoodMedicines AgencyFDA approvalHealth authoritiesCancer disordersSimilar findingsTherapeutic ratingFirst indicationDrugsIndicationsApprovalFDAPatientsLarge subsetProportionPhysicians
2022
Spending by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Before and After Confirmation of Benefit for Drugs Granted US Food and Drug Administration Accelerated Approval, 2012 to 2017
Skydel JJ, Egilman AC, Wallach JD, Ramachandran R, Gupta R, Ross JS. Spending by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Before and After Confirmation of Benefit for Drugs Granted US Food and Drug Administration Accelerated Approval, 2012 to 2017. JAMA Health Forum 2022, 3: e221158. PMID: 35977252, PMCID: PMC9142876, DOI: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.1158.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsSurrogate end pointsCross-sectional studyClinical benefitConfirmation of benefitEnd pointOriginal indicationClinical outcomesUS FoodConfirmatory trialsMedicaid ServicesPrimary end pointUnproven clinical benefitsTrial end pointsClinical trial resultsTypes of drugsPostapproval trialsAccelerated approvalClinical trialsMAIN OUTCOMEDrug AdministrationMedicare Part BStandard approvalConversion statusSupplemental indicationsTrial results
2021
Characteristics of Clinical Studies Used for US Food and Drug Administration Supplemental Indication Approvals of Drugs and Biologics, 2017 to 2019
Dhodapkar M, Zhang AD, Puthumana J, Downing NS, Shah ND, Ross JS. Characteristics of Clinical Studies Used for US Food and Drug Administration Supplemental Indication Approvals of Drugs and Biologics, 2017 to 2019. JAMA Network Open 2021, 4: e2113224. PMID: 34110392, PMCID: PMC8193429, DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.13224.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPrimary efficacy end pointEfficacy end pointPivotal trialsIndication approvalsActive comparatorClinical outcomesSupplemental indicationsUS FoodEnd pointOriginal approvalTherapeutic areasPivotal efficacy trialsCross-sectional studyAdditional clinical dataDrug Administration approvalNew indication approvalsStrength of evidenceAdministration approvalMonths durationClinical dataClinical studiesEfficacy trialsMedian numberCancer indicationsMAIN OUTCOME
2019
Association Between Food and Drug Administration Advisory Committee Recommendations and Agency Actions, 2008–2015
ZHANG AD, SCHWARTZ JL, ROSS JS. Association Between Food and Drug Administration Advisory Committee Recommendations and Agency Actions, 2008–2015. Milbank Quarterly 2019, 97: 796-819. PMID: 31304643, PMCID: PMC6739629, DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.12403.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2017
Post‐marketing research and its outcome for novel anticancer agents approved by both the FDA and EMA between 2005 and 2010: A cross‐sectional study
Zeitoun J, Baron G, Vivot A, Atal I, Downing NS, Ross JS, Ravaud P. Post‐marketing research and its outcome for novel anticancer agents approved by both the FDA and EMA between 2005 and 2010: A cross‐sectional study. International Journal Of Cancer 2017, 142: 414-423. PMID: 28929484, DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31061.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPost-marketing trialsPrimary outcomeNovel anticancer agentsPost-market researchAnticancer agentsSupplemental indicationsCross-sectional studyPost-marketing researchEuropean Medicines AgencyCross-sectional analysisTypes of cancerPost-market trialClinical endpointsHematologic malignanciesKidney cancerSolid cancersSurrogate endpointsUS FoodDrug AdministrationMedicines AgencyOverall populationCancerTrialsPublication rateOutcomesClinical Evidence Supporting US Food and Drug Administration Approval of Otolaryngologic Prescription Drug Indications, 2005‐2014
Rathi VK, Wang B, Ross JS, Downing NS, Kesselheim AS, Gray ST. Clinical Evidence Supporting US Food and Drug Administration Approval of Otolaryngologic Prescription Drug Indications, 2005‐2014. Otolaryngology 2017, 156: 683-692. PMID: 28116974, DOI: 10.1177/0194599816689666.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPivotal studiesOriginal indicationPrimary endpointClinical evidenceDrug indicationsSupplemental indicationsUS FoodFDA approvalAvailable FDA documentsDouble-blinded studyDrug Administration approvalInformed treatment decisionsPivotal clinical studiesPremarket evidenceOtolaryngologic diseaseMedian enrollmentSurrogate markerAdministration approvalClinical studiesTreatment decisionsMost indicationsDrug AdministrationInitial approvalMultidisciplinary teamPrescription drugs