2021
A randomized evaluation of the TriGuard™ HDH cerebral embolic protection device to Reduce the Impact of Cerebral Embolic LEsions after TransCatheter Aortic Valve ImplanTation: the REFLECT I trial
Lansky AJ, Makkar R, Nazif T, Messé S, Forrest J, Sharma R, Schofer J, Linke A, Brown D, Dhoble A, Horwitz P, Zang M, DeMarco F, Rajagopal V, Dwyer MG, Zivadinov R, Stella P, Rovin J, Parise H, Kodali S, Baumbach A, Moses J. A randomized evaluation of the TriGuard™ HDH cerebral embolic protection device to Reduce the Impact of Cerebral Embolic LEsions after TransCatheter Aortic Valve ImplanTation: the REFLECT I trial. European Heart Journal 2021, 42: 2670-2679. PMID: 34000004, DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab213.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTranscatheter aortic valve replacementEfficacy endpointCerebral embolic protection devicesTranscatheter aortic valve implantationCentral nervous system injuryCerebral embolic lesionsCerebral ischemic lesionsHealth Stroke ScalePrimary efficacy endpointPrimary safety outcomeAortic valve replacementAortic valve implantationEmbolic protection devicesNervous system injuryDiffusion-weighted magnetic resonanceMontreal Cognitive AssessmentEffectiveness endpointCause mortalityCerebral protectionSafety endpointStroke ScaleValve implantationValve replacementI trialIschemic lesionsRandomized Evaluation of TriGuard 3 Cerebral Embolic Protection After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement REFLECT II
Nazif TM, Moses J, Sharma R, Dhoble A, Rovin J, Brown D, Horwitz P, Makkar R, Stoler R, Forrest J, Messé S, Dickerman S, Brennan J, Zivadinov R, Dwyer MG, Lansky AJ, Investigators R. Randomized Evaluation of TriGuard 3 Cerebral Embolic Protection After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement REFLECT II. JACC Cardiovascular Interventions 2021, 14: 515-527. PMID: 33663779, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.11.011.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTranscatheter aortic valve replacementAortic valve replacementSafety endpointValve replacementProcedure-related ischemic strokeCerebral embolic protectionComposite efficacy endpointPrimary safety endpointCerebral embolizationCerebral protectionEfficacy endpointII trialCerebral injuryIschemic strokeEmbolic protectionPatientsDrug AdministrationUS sitesU.S. FoodEndpointData reviewTrialsMulticenterEmbolizationInjury
2013
Evaluation of XIENCE V Everolimus-Eluting and Taxus Express2 Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stents in Patients With Jailed Side Branches From the SPIRIT IV Trial at 2 Years
Forrest JK, Lansky AJ, Meller SM, Hou L, Sood P, Applegate RJ, Wang JC, Skelding KA, Shah A, Kereiakes DJ, Sudhir K, Cristea E, Yaqub M, Stone GW. Evaluation of XIENCE V Everolimus-Eluting and Taxus Express2 Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stents in Patients With Jailed Side Branches From the SPIRIT IV Trial at 2 Years. The American Journal Of Cardiology 2013, 111: 1580-1586. PMID: 23499270, DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.01.330.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsSPIRIT IV trialMajor adverse cardiac eventsAdverse cardiac eventsClinical outcomesXIENCE VTarget lesionsCardiac eventsNovo native coronary artery lesionsIschemia-driven target vessel revascularizationTwo-year clinical outcomesNative coronary artery lesionsSPIRIT IIISide branchesXIENCE V EverolimusTarget lesion failureTarget vessel revascularizationCoronary artery lesionsPercutaneous coronary interventionSuperior clinical outcomesTreatment of patientsCoronary stent systemDrug-eluting stentsDiverse patient populationsEverolimus-ElutingSPIRIT IV