2023
Three-year outcomes following transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in younger, low surgical risk patients with severe aortic stenosis
Modine T, Tchetche D, Van Mieghem N, Huang J, Forrest J, Reardon M. Three-year outcomes following transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in younger, low surgical risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. European Heart Journal 2023, 44: ehad655.1713. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad655.1713.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchTranscatheter aortic valve implantationSevere aortic stenosisSelf-expanding transcatheter aortic valve implantationLow-risk patientsAortic stenosisRisk patientsLower riskCause mortalityPrimary endpointYounger patientsLower incidenceLow surgical risk patientsSurgical aortic valve replacementGreater paravalvular regurgitationSurgical risk patientsAortic stenosis patientsAortic valve replacementIntermediate-term outcomesLow surgical riskAortic valve implantationThree-Year OutcomesEffective orifice areaYears of ageAortic gradientEchocardiographic outcomes
2022
Propensity-Matched 1-Year Outcomes Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Bicuspid and Tricuspid Patients
Deeb GM, Reardon MJ, Ramlawi B, Yakubov SJ, Chetcuti SJ, Kleiman NS, Mangi AA, Zahr F, Song HK, Gada H, Mumtaz M, Heiser J, Merhi W, Murrah CP, Noel T, Kirshner M, Byrne T, Ito S, Huang J, Forrest JK. Propensity-Matched 1-Year Outcomes Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Bicuspid and Tricuspid Patients. JACC Cardiovascular Interventions 2022, 15: 511-522. PMID: 35272776, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.10.027.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTranscatheter aortic valve replacementAortic valve replacementValve replacementAortic stenosisTricuspid patientsOutcomes Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementEvolut Low Risk trialLow surgical risk patientsIndependent clinical events committeeBicuspid aortic stenosisLow-risk trialsSurgical risk patientsTricuspid aortic stenosisPropensity-matched groupsSerious adverse eventsClinical events committeeIndependent core laboratoryBicuspid aortic valveEffective orifice areaTricuspid groupCause mortalityPrimary endpointTAVR patientsAdverse eventsRisk patients
2014
Comparison of Outcomes of Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty Plus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Percutaneous Aortic Balloon Valvuloplasty Alone During the Same Hospitalization in the United States
Singh V, Patel NJ, Badheka AO, Arora S, Patel N, Macon C, Savani GT, Manvar S, Patel J, Thakkar B, Panchal V, Solanki S, Patel N, Chothani A, Panaich SS, Ram V, Kliger CA, Schreiber T, Neill W, Cohen MG, Alfonso CE, Grines CL, Mangi A, Pfau S, Forrest JK, Cleman M, Makkar R. Comparison of Outcomes of Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty Plus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Percutaneous Aortic Balloon Valvuloplasty Alone During the Same Hospitalization in the United States. The American Journal Of Cardiology 2014, 115: 480-486. PMID: 25543235, DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.11.032.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPercutaneous coronary interventionLength of stayCost of hospitalizationSame hospitalizationPCI groupHospital mortalityComplication rateConcomitant percutaneous coronary interventionHigh surgical risk patientsPercutaneous aortic balloon valvuloplastySimilar LOSAortic balloon valvuloplastySurgical risk patientsBalloon aortic valvuloplastyHospital mortality rateHigher hospitalization costsInvasive endovascular therapiesComparison of outcomesAortic valvuloplastyBalloon valvuloplastyWeekend admissionCoronary interventionOnly patientsRisk patientsSecondary outcomes