2024
Real-World Experience and Outcomes With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Protected Versus Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Insights from the Veteran Affairs Clinical Assessment Reporting and Tracking Program
Gonzalez P, Hebbe A, Hussain Y, Khera R, Banerjee S, Plomondon M, Waldo S, Pfau S, Curtis J, Shah S. Real-World Experience and Outcomes With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Protected Versus Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Insights from the Veteran Affairs Clinical Assessment Reporting and Tracking Program. The American Journal Of Cardiology 2024, 222: 39-50. PMID: 38677666, DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.04.039.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchULM percutaneous coronary interventionPercutaneous coronary interventionPropensity-matched cohortMyocardial infarctionCoronary interventionAll-cause mortalityTracking programUS clinical practiceOne-year MACEOne-year outcomesIncidence of rehospitalizationAdverse cardiovascular eventsUnprotected left main coronary artery diseaseAcute coronary syndromeCoronary artery diseaseRates of MIMechanical circulatory supportLeft main percutaneous coronary interventionPCI patientsUrgent revascularizationPractice patternsCart programLeft main bifurcationPrimary outcomeMatched cohort
2020
Response by Amin et al to Letters Regarding Article, “The Evolving Landscape of Impella Use in the United States Among Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Mechanical Circulatory Support”
Amin AP, Rao SV, Bach RG, Curtis JP, Desai N, McNeely C, Al-Badarin F, House JA, Kulkarni H, Masoudi FA, Spertus JA. Response by Amin et al to Letters Regarding Article, “The Evolving Landscape of Impella Use in the United States Among Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Mechanical Circulatory Support”. Circulation 2020, 142: e82-e84. PMID: 32776840, DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.120.048260.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPercutaneous coronary interventionMechanical circulatory supportImpella useCoronary interventionCirculatory support
2019
The Evolving Landscape of Impella® Use in the United States Among Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Mechanical Circulatory Support
Amin AP, Spertus JA, Curtis JP, Desai N, Masoudi FA, Bach RG, McNeely C, Al-Badarin F, House JA, Kulkarni H, Rao SV. The Evolving Landscape of Impella® Use in the United States Among Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Mechanical Circulatory Support. Circulation 2019, 141: 273-284. PMID: 31735078, DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.119.044007.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPercutaneous coronary interventionMechanical circulatory supportAcute kidney injuryImpella useOdds ratioKidney injuryCoronary interventionClinical outcomesCirculatory supportAdverse outcomesPremier Healthcare DatabaseClustering of patientsHigh rateAdverse eventsPatient levelImpellaPropensity adjustmentHospital levelHealthcare databasesPatientsUS hospitalsHospitalPropensity scoreAssociated outcomesWide variation
2015
Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Sandhu A, McCoy LA, Negi SI, Hameed I, Atri P, Al'Aref SJ, Curtis J, McNulty E, Anderson HV, Shroff A, Menegus M, Swaminathan RV, Gurm H, Messenger J, Wang T, Bradley SM. Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Circulation 2015, 132: 1243-1251. PMID: 26286905, DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.114.014451.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsIntra-aortic balloon pumpPercutaneous coronary interventionMechanical circulatory supportUse of IABPCardiogenic shockCirculatory supportCoronary interventionNational Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCISetting of PCIStudy periodProportion of patientsHospital-level variationLarge national registryHalf of hospitalsBalloon pumpNational registryPatientsHospitalInterventionConcurrent increaseSettingTemporal trendsCathPCIRegistryContemporary useUTILIZATION OF MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION: INSIGHTS FROM THE NCDR
Negi S, Sandhu A, McCoy L, Hameed I, Atri P, Al’Aref S, Curtis J, McNulty E, Anderson H, Shroff A, Menegus M, Swaminathan R, Gurm H, Messenger J, Wang T, Bradley S. UTILIZATION OF MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION: INSIGHTS FROM THE NCDR. Journal Of The American College Of Cardiology 2015, 65: a168. DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(15)60168-1.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPercutaneous coronary interventionMechanical circulatory supportCoronary interventionCirculatory supportPatientsNCDR