2012
The evolution and current use of invasive hemodynamic monitoring for predicting volume responsiveness during resuscitation, perioperative, and critical care
Manoach S, Weingart SD, Charchaflieh J. The evolution and current use of invasive hemodynamic monitoring for predicting volume responsiveness during resuscitation, perioperative, and critical care. Journal Of Clinical Anesthesia 2012, 24: 242-250. PMID: 22537573, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2011.11.003.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsHemodynamic monitorInvasive hemodynamic monitoringCentral venous cathetersImportant clinical findingsRecent efficacy dataInotropic supportVenous cathetersAppropriate patientsIntravenous accessPulmonary arteryClinical findingsHemodynamic monitoringVolume responsivenessFluid responsivenessAlternative therapiesEfficacy dataCritical careInvasive monitorsDiagnostic efficacyRhythm parametersCurrent useResponsivenessContinuous dataVasomotorPatients
1989
A randomized comparison of labetalol and nitroprusside for induced hypotension
Fahmy N, Bottros M, Charchaflieh J, Matta E, Sunder N. A randomized comparison of labetalol and nitroprusside for induced hypotension. Journal Of Clinical Anesthesia 1989, 1: 409-413. PMID: 2696505, DOI: 10.1016/0952-8180(89)90002-0.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsBlood pressureMean arterial blood pressureLabetalol-induced hypotensionNitroprusside-induced hypotensionArterial blood pressureMajor orthopedic proceduresDrug-induced reductionLabetalol administrationInduced hypotensionNitroprusside infusionRandomized studyRandomized comparisonCardiac outputArterial PO2Anesthetic protocolHeart rateOrthopedic proceduresHypotensionPatientsNitroprussideLabetalolHypertensionDiscontinuationInfusionAdministration