2021
Facility-Level Variation in Use of Locoregional Therapy for Metastatic Prostate Cancer
Buck M, Ghiraldi E, Demkowicz P, Park H, An Y, Kann B, Yu J, Sprenkle P, Kim I, Leapman M. Facility-Level Variation in Use of Locoregional Therapy for Metastatic Prostate Cancer. Urology Practice 2021, 9: 141-149. PMID: 37145694, DOI: 10.1097/upj.0000000000000290.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMetastatic prostate cancerLocal therapyProstate cancerLocoregional therapyFacility-level useFacility-level variationM1 prostate cancerDefinitive local therapyNational Cancer DatabaseMetastatic prostate adenocarcinomaClinical practice guidelinesMultilevel logistic regressionM1 diseasePatient factorsTherapy useUninsured statusRadical prostatectomyCancer DatabaseProstate adenocarcinomaHigh comorbidityLocal treatmentPatient levelPractice guidelinesLower oddsPatientsTrends in the use of administrative databases in urologic oncology: 2000 – 2019.
Leopold Z, Dave P, Menon A, Patel H, Srivastava A, Kim I, Jang T, Singer E. Trends in the use of administrative databases in urologic oncology: 2000 – 2019. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2021, 39: 356-356. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.6_suppl.356.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchNational Surgical Quality Improvement ProgramPremier Healthcare DatabaseNational Cancer DatabaseNationwide Inpatient SampleAdministrative databasesUrologic oncologySEER-MedicareSurgical Quality Improvement ProgramStudy periodEnd Results (SEER) databaseQuality Improvement ProgramRepresentative study populationComparative effectiveness researchResults databaseGenitourinary malignanciesInpatient SampleBladder cancerCancer DatabaseProstate cancerInclusion criteriaStudy populationTreatment trendsAD useHealthcare databasesLarger sample sizeTrends in the use of administrative databases in urologic oncology: 2000–2019
Leopold Z, Dave P, Menon A, Patel H, Srivastava A, Kim I, Jang T, Singer E. Trends in the use of administrative databases in urologic oncology: 2000–2019. Urologic Oncology Seminars And Original Investigations 2021, 39: 487-492. PMID: 33551250, DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.01.014.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAdministrative databasesUrologic oncologyNational Surgical Quality Improvement ProgramSurgical Quality Improvement ProgramPremier Healthcare DatabaseEnd Results (SEER) databaseNational Cancer DatabaseNationwide Inpatient SampleQuality Improvement ProgramRepresentative study populationComparative effectiveness researchGenitourinary malignanciesResults databaseSEER-MedicareInpatient SampleBladder cancerCancer DatabaseProstate cancerInclusion criteriaStudy populationTreatment trendsAD useHealthcare databasesLarger sample sizeStudy period
2020
Association of lymph node count and survival after primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) for testicular nonseminomatous germ cell tumor (NSGCT).
Patel H, Srivastava A, Kim S, Singer E, Kim I, Jang T. Association of lymph node count and survival after primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) for testicular nonseminomatous germ cell tumor (NSGCT). Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2020, 38: e17052-e17052. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.e17052.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchNonseminomatous germ cell tumorsRetroperitoneal lymph node dissectionLymph node countOverall survivalLN countStage IPrimary retroperitoneal lymph node dissectionTesticular nonseminomatous germ cell tumorsMultivariate analysisClinical stage ILymph node dissectionNational Cancer DatabaseSingle-center studyKaplan-Meier methodGerm cell tumorsNode countPT2 diseaseNode dissectionAnalytic cohortFavorable survivalCenter studyCell tumorsCancer DatabaseTherapeutic implicationsAcademic centers
2018
MP84-12 OUTCOMES AND FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH RECEIPT OF OPEN VS MINIMALLY INVASIVE RETROPERITONEAL LYMPH NODE DISSECTION (RPLND) FOR TESTIS CANCER: ANALYZING THE NATIONAL CANCER DATABASE (NCDB) FROM 2010-2014
Tabakin A, Kim S, Polotti C, Rivera-Núñez Z, Sterling J, Modi P, Farber N, Radadia K, Parikh R, Goyal S, Weiss R, Kim I, Elsamra S, Singer E, Jang T. MP84-12 OUTCOMES AND FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH RECEIPT OF OPEN VS MINIMALLY INVASIVE RETROPERITONEAL LYMPH NODE DISSECTION (RPLND) FOR TESTIS CANCER: ANALYZING THE NATIONAL CANCER DATABASE (NCDB) FROM 2010-2014. Journal Of Urology 2018, 199: e1129. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.02.2780.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2017
Comparative effectiveness of laparoscopic versus open prostatectomy for men with low-risk prostate cancer
Parikh R, Patel A, Kim S, Kim I, Goyal S. Comparative effectiveness of laparoscopic versus open prostatectomy for men with low-risk prostate cancer. International Journal Of Surgery Oncology 2017, 2: e13. PMID: 29177226, PMCID: PMC5673152, DOI: 10.1097/ij9.0000000000000013.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLow-risk prostate cancerLow-risk prostate cancer patientsNational Cancer DatabaseProstate cancer patientsProstate cancerCancer patientsCancer DatabaseMortality rateComparative effectivenessAcademic/research centersCharlson-Deyo comorbidity scoreHigh-volume hospitalsSurgical margin statusAbove inclusion criteriaRisk of deathCase-control studyComorbidity scoreMargin statusSurgery typeBlack patientsInsurance statusOpen prostatectomyOdds ratioInclusion criteriaClinicopathologic parametersLocal Therapy Improves Overall Survival in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Prostate Cancer
Parikh R, Byun J, Goyal S, Kim I. Local Therapy Improves Overall Survival in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Prostate Cancer. The Prostate 2017, 77: 559-572. PMID: 28093791, DOI: 10.1002/pros.23294.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsNational Cancer DatabaseMetastatic prostate cancerLocal therapyOverall survivalProstate cancerRadiation therapyMultivariable Cox proportional hazards modelsLower co-morbidity scoreFive-year overall survivalCox proportional hazards modelAcademic/research programCo-morbidity scoreSuperior overall survivalNode-negative statusProspective clinical trialsKaplan-Meier methodLower T stagePatterns of careProportional hazards modelPropensity-score matchingPrimary diseaseT stageMedicare insuranceGleason scoreCancer Database