2020
Minimally Invasive Image-Guided Ablation, Osteoplasty, Reinforcement, and Internal Fixation (AORIF) for Osteolytic Lesions in the Pelvis and Periarticular Regions of Weight-Bearing Bones
Lee FY, Latich I, Toombs C, Mungur A, Conway D, Alder K, Ibe I, Lindskog D, Friedlaender G. Minimally Invasive Image-Guided Ablation, Osteoplasty, Reinforcement, and Internal Fixation (AORIF) for Osteolytic Lesions in the Pelvis and Periarticular Regions of Weight-Bearing Bones. Journal Of Vascular And Interventional Radiology 2020, 31: 649-658.e1. PMID: 32139256, DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2019.11.029.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAblation TechniquesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBone CementsBone NeoplasmsBone RemodelingBone ScrewsCalcaneusCementoplastyFemaleFemoral NeoplasmsFemurFracture Fixation, InternalHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsteolysisPelvic BonesPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesRecovery of FunctionTibiaTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeWeight-BearingConceptsOsteolytic lesionsInternal fixationVisual analog scale pain scoreMusculoskeletal Tumor Society scoreProspective clinical cohort studyFunctional ambulation scoreOsteolytic skeletal lesionsPainful osteolytic lesionsScale pain scoresClinical cohort studyInvasive percutaneous approachWeight-bearing boneInternal fixation screwsBalloon osteoplastyPain scoresCohort studyProphylactic stabilizationSevere painSociety ScoreConsecutive patientsSurgical treatmentEarly outcomesTreatment optionsPercutaneous approachFunctional improvement
2003
Malignant bone tumors: limb sparing versus amputation.
DiCaprio MR, Friedlaender GE. Malignant bone tumors: limb sparing versus amputation. Journal Of The American Academy Of Orthopaedic Surgeons 2003, 11: 25-37. PMID: 12699369, DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200301000-00005.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAmputation, SurgicalArthrodesisBone LengtheningBone NeoplasmsBone TransplantationHumansPostoperative ComplicationsProsthesis DesignProsthesis ImplantationTransplantation, HomologousConceptsLimb-sparing proceduresAppropriate surgical alternativesFunctional outcome studiesMainstay of treatmentExtent of diseaseAllograft-prosthetic compositeMalignant bone tumorsImportant outcome measureEffective chemotherapeutic agentLimb sparingMost patientsPatient ageReconstructed limbExpandable prosthesisSurgical alternativeTumor locationBone tumorsReconstructive surgeryOutcome measuresOutcome studiesSatisfactory functionModular endoprosthesesSurvival rateBone graftChemotherapeutic agents
2001
Evaluation of OP-1 as a Graft Substitute for Intertransverse Process Lumbar Fusion
Grauer J, Patel T, Erulkar J, Troiano N, Panjabi M, Friedlaender G. Evaluation of OP-1 as a Graft Substitute for Intertransverse Process Lumbar Fusion. Spine 2001, 26: 127-133. PMID: 11154530, DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200101150-00004.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsIntertransverse process lumbar fusionIntertransverse process fusionManual palpationLumbar fusionOP-1Rabbit modelAutogenous iliac crest boneProcess fusionGraft substituteNew Zealand white rabbitsIliac crest boneOP-1 groupZealand white rabbitsMultidirectional flexibility testingAutograft specimensLess morbidityBiomechanical testing resultsCrest boneStudy groupAutograft groupBACKGROUND DATAFusion massWhite rabbitsL5-L6Bone graft substitute
1990
Orthopaedic manifestations of sickle-cell disease.
Huo M, Friedlaender G, Marsh J. Orthopaedic manifestations of sickle-cell disease. The Yale Journal Of Biology And Medicine 1990, 63: 195-207. PMID: 2238715, PMCID: PMC2589295.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAnesthesiaArthritis, InfectiousBone and BonesBone DiseasesFemur HeadHumansInfarctionMuscular DiseasesOsteonecrosisPainPostoperative ComplicationsRisk FactorsSickle Cell TraitConceptsSickle cell diseaseOrthopaedic manifestationsMajor orthopaedic manifestationsSurgical treatment alternativesFirst case reportJoint sequelaeSerious complicationsClinical entityCase reportDisorder pathophysiologyAccurate diagnosisTreatment alternativesDiseasePathophysiologyOsteonecrosisManifestationsNumerous investigatorsSepsisArthritisMorbidityOsteomyelitisPainComplicationsSequelaePatients
1985
Bone banking and clinical applications.
Friedlaender G. Bone banking and clinical applications. Transplantation Proceedings 1985, 17: 99-104. PMID: 3907058.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
1983
Biomechanical Properties of Bone Allografts
Pelker R, Friedlaender G, Markham T. Biomechanical Properties of Bone Allografts. Clinical Orthopaedics And Related Research® 1983, 174: 54-57. PMID: 6339144, DOI: 10.1097/00003086-198304000-00009.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsOrthopaedic oncology serviceLow-grade tumorsPresence of recurrenceRelationship of complicationsMassachusetts General HospitalAllograft fractureOncology servicesAllograft implantationFunctional statusSkin sloughGeneral HospitalBone allograftIntramedullary rodFunctional restorationPatientsBenign conditionsResectionBone conditionsCadaveric segmentsComplicationsGraftBiomechanical propertiesTumorsMore yearsInfection