2023
Clonally Selected Lines After CRISPR-Cas Editing Are Not Isogenic
Panda A, Suvakov M, Mariani J, Drucker K, Park Y, Jang Y, Kollmeyer T, Sarkar G, Bae T, Kim J, Yoon W, Jenkins R, Vaccarino F, Abyzov A. Clonally Selected Lines After CRISPR-Cas Editing Are Not Isogenic. The CRISPR Journal 2023, 6: 176-182. PMID: 37071670, PMCID: PMC10123805, DOI: 10.1089/crispr.2022.0050.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCopy number alterationsSeparate genomic lociSingle nucleotide mutationsApplication of CRISPRCRISPR-Cas editingOff-target editsScreening of clonesGenomic divergenceWhole-genome sequencingGenomic lociSelection of clonesGenome sequencingNucleotide mutationsTarget editsCultured cellsClonal linesNumber alterationsCell cloningClonesMutationsCloningCRISPR
2020
SCELLECTOR: ranking amplification bias in single cells using shallow sequencing
Sarangi V, Jourdon A, Bae T, Panda A, Vaccarino F, Abyzov A. SCELLECTOR: ranking amplification bias in single cells using shallow sequencing. BMC Bioinformatics 2020, 21: 521. PMID: 33183232, PMCID: PMC7663899, DOI: 10.1186/s12859-020-03858-y.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMultiple displacement amplificationShallow sequencingSingle-cell platformsSingle-cell sequencingCoverage sequencing dataSingle cellsHuman neuronal cellsMosaic mutationsAmount of DNAAmplification qualityCell sequencingCoverage sequencingHigh-coverage dataSequencing dataHaplotype informationPhi29 polymeraseDNA damageIndividual cellsNeuronal cellsSequencingAmplification biasAllelic imbalancePresence of sitesMutationsFragment length