2004
Automated detection of immunofluorescently labeled cytomegalovirus‐infected cells in isolated peripheral blood leukocytes using decision tree analysis
Ladanyi A, Sher AC, Herlitz A, Bergsrud DE, Kraeft S, Kepros J, McDaid G, Ferguson D, Landry ML, Chen LB. Automated detection of immunofluorescently labeled cytomegalovirus‐infected cells in isolated peripheral blood leukocytes using decision tree analysis. Cytometry Part A 2004, 58A: 147-156. PMID: 15057968, DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.20016.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPeripheral blood leukocytesBlood leukocytesPatient samplesDecision tree analysisImage cytometryCytomegalovirus-infected cellsCMV infectionCytomegalovirus infectionAntiviral therapyViral antigensCellular featuresCytospin preparationsLeukocytesInfectionCytometryManual microscopic analysisImage cytometerRare cellsCellsSimilar resultsPatientsCMVTherapyAntigenDiagnosis
2000
A Multisite Trial Comparing Two Cytomegalovirus (CMV) pp65 Antigenemia Test Kits, Biotest CMV Brite and Bartels/Argene CMV Antigenemia
St. George K, Boyd M, Lipson S, Ferguson D, Cartmell G, Falk L, Rinaldo C, Landry M. A Multisite Trial Comparing Two Cytomegalovirus (CMV) pp65 Antigenemia Test Kits, Biotest CMV Brite and Bartels/Argene CMV Antigenemia. Journal Of Clinical Microbiology 2000, 38: 1430-1433. PMID: 10747120, PMCID: PMC86458, DOI: 10.1128/jcm.38.4.1430-1433.2000.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPp65 antigenemiaTransplant recipientsHuman immunodeficiency virus-positive patientsImmunodeficiency virus-positive patientsBone marrow transplant recipientsCMV pp65 antigenemiaOrgan transplant recipientsVirus-positive patientsMarrow transplant recipientsPositive cell countsPeripheral blood leukocytesNegative predictive valueCMV antigenemiaBlood leukocytesAntigenemiaBlood specimensPredictive valueCell countMultisite trialCytomegalovirusStatistical differenceTotalTest kitRecipientsKit