2018
Corneal hysteresis and anterior segment optical coherence tomography anatomical parameters in primary angle closure suspects
Hussnain SA, Kovacs KD, Warren JL, Teng CC. Corneal hysteresis and anterior segment optical coherence tomography anatomical parameters in primary angle closure suspects. Clinical And Experimental Ophthalmology 2018, 46: 468-472. PMID: 29251401, PMCID: PMC8327184, DOI: 10.1111/ceo.13135.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPrimary angle closure suspectAnterior chamber depthCentral corneal thicknessAngle closure suspectsCorneal hysteresisIntraocular pressureOcular Response AnalyzerCorneal thicknessOptical coherence tomographyAnterior segment optical coherence tomographyORA measurementsGoldmann intraocular pressureLower corneal hysteresisCorneal resistance factorAnterior segment anatomyPeripheral corneal thicknessAnterior segment measurementsRetrospective reviewClinical evaluationSpherical equivalentOcular pathologyPACS patientsScan ultrasoundChamber depthGoldmann applanation
2016
Effect of supine body position on central corneal thickness
Maslin JS, Teng CC, Chadha N, Liu J. Effect of supine body position on central corneal thickness. Clinical And Experimental Ophthalmology 2016, 44: 678-683. PMID: 26991869, DOI: 10.1111/ceo.12742.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCentral corneal thicknessOpen-angle glaucoma patientsSupine body positionHealthy subjectsGlaucoma patientsSupine positioningMin supineCorneal thicknessBody positionLaterality of eyeAngle glaucoma patientsUniversity Eye ClinicCross-sectional studyGlaucoma groupEye clinicSupine positionSitting positionUltrasound pachymeterPatientsSignificant differencesSupineSimilar ratesSubjectsConsecutive measurementsEyes
2011
Corneal Hysteresis and Beta-Zone Parapapillary Atrophy
Hayes DD, Teng CC, de Moraes CG, Tello C, Liebmann JM, Ritch R. Corneal Hysteresis and Beta-Zone Parapapillary Atrophy. American Journal Of Ophthalmology 2011, 153: 358-362.e1. PMID: 21920490, DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.06.025.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsVisual field mean deviationCorneal hysteresisCorneal resistance factorOcular Response AnalyzerCentral corneal thicknessDisc photographsParapapillary atrophySignificant differencesBeta-zone parapapillary atrophyΒ-zone parapapillary atrophyClear corneal phacoemulsificationContact lens useCross-sectional studyLens useFellow eyesGlaucoma patientsOcular surgeryCorneal abnormalitiesMasked fashionCorneal thicknessUnivariate analysisStudy visitΒPPAExclusion criteriaMultivariate analysisInitial Parafoveal Versus Peripheral Scotomas in Glaucoma: Risk Factors and Visual Field Characteristics
Park SC, De Moraes CG, Teng CC, Tello C, Liebmann JM, Ritch R. Initial Parafoveal Versus Peripheral Scotomas in Glaucoma: Risk Factors and Visual Field Characteristics. Ophthalmology 2011, 118: 1782-1789. PMID: 21665283, DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.02.013.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsInitial parafoveal scotomaMaximum untreated intraocular pressureUntreated intraocular pressureSystemic risk factorsRisk factorsIntraocular pressureVisual fieldDisc hemorrhage detectionVF mean deviationGroup of patientsCentral corneal thicknessStandard visual fieldsVisual field characteristicsDH detectionParafoveal scotomaPeripheral scotomaCentral field lossClinical characteristicsMean deviationNasal stepCorneal thicknessRefractive errorFamily historyObservational studyHigh risk
2010
Risk Factors for Visual Field Progression in Treated Glaucoma
De Moraes CG, Juthani VJ, Liebmann JM, Teng CC, Tello C, Susanna R, Ritch R. Risk Factors for Visual Field Progression in Treated Glaucoma. JAMA Ophthalmology 2010, 129: 562-568. PMID: 21555607, DOI: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.72.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsBeta-zone parapapillary atrophyVisual field progressionCentral corneal thicknessDisc hemorrhageParapapillary atrophyCorneal thicknessField progressionPeak IOPVF progressionRisk factorsBaseline VF mean deviationIOP-independent risk factorsThinner central corneal thicknessRepeatable VF lossVF mean deviationSwedish Interactive Threshold AlgorithmGlaucoma Progression StudyRetrospective cohortGlaucoma patientsIntraocular pressurePointwise linear regressionVF lossBaseline diagnosisVF examinationDisease progression
2009
Visual Field Progression Differences between Normal-Tension and Exfoliative High-Tension Glaucoma
Ahrlich KG, De Moraes CG, Teng CC, Prata TS, Tello C, Ritch R, Liebmann JM. Visual Field Progression Differences between Normal-Tension and Exfoliative High-Tension Glaucoma. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 2009, 51: 1458-1463. PMID: 20042657, DOI: 10.1167/iovs.09-3806.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsHigher mean IOPHigh-tension glaucomaMean IOPNTG eyesGreater central corneal thicknessPointwise linear regression analysisDiagnosis of NTGVisual field changesOpen-angle glaucomaCentral corneal thicknessGlaucoma Progression StudyCentral VFGlaucoma surveillanceNTG groupCorneal thicknessNormal IOPVF testsProgression outcomesLinear regression analysisGlaucomaIOPProgression StudyPatientsMultivariate modelNTG