2020
Comparing programmed death ligand 1 scores for predicting pembrolizumab efficacy in head and neck cancer
Emancipator K, Huang L, Aurora-Garg D, Bal T, Cohen EEW, Harrington K, Soulières D, Le Tourneau C, Licitra L, Burtness B, Swaby R. Comparing programmed death ligand 1 scores for predicting pembrolizumab efficacy in head and neck cancer. Modern Pathology 2020, 34: 532-541. PMID: 33239737, DOI: 10.1038/s41379-020-00710-9.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorBiopsyClinical Decision-MakingClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicDecision Support TechniquesDisease ProgressionHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansImmunohistochemistryPredictive Value of TestsProgression-Free SurvivalRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRetrospective StudiesSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckTime FactorsConceptsTumor proportion scoreObjective response ratePD-L1 expression statusDeath ligand 1 (PD-L1) expressionNeck squamous cell carcinomaImmune checkpoint inhibitorsLigand 1 expressionPD-L1 statusProgression-free survivalSquamous cell carcinomaKEYNOTE-040Pembrolizumab efficacyCheckpoint inhibitorsOverall survivalMetastatic HNSCCCell carcinomaNeck cancerClinical trialsProportion scoreInvestigator's choiceResponse rateExpression statusYouden indexHNSCCPatients
2019
Phase III Randomized Trial of Chemotherapy With or Without Bevacizumab in Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer.
Argiris A, Li S, Savvides P, Ohr JP, Gilbert J, Levine MA, Chakravarti A, Haigentz M, Saba NF, Ikpeazu CV, Schneider CJ, Pinto HA, Forastiere AA, Burtness B. Phase III Randomized Trial of Chemotherapy With or Without Bevacizumab in Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2019, 37: 3266-3274. PMID: 31618129, PMCID: PMC6980834, DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.00555.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabDisease ProgressionDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProgression-Free SurvivalSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckTime FactorsUnited StatesConceptsAddition of bevacizumabProgression-free survivalOverall survivalResponse rateMedian progression-free survivalMetastatic squamous cell carcinomaPlatinum-based chemotherapy doubletsTreatment-related grade 3Phase III randomized trialsTreatment-related deathsMedian overall survivalPlatinum-based chemotherapySquamous cell carcinomaBetter toxicity profileBiomarker-driven studiesOverall response rateHumanized monoclonal antibodyVascular endothelial growth factorEndothelial growth factorChemotherapy doubletsMedian OSMetastatic SCCHNOS ratesEligible patientsMetastatic headHyperprogression after one dose of nivolumab in sinonasal cancer: A case report
Xiang JJ, Uy NF, Minja FJ, Verter EE, Burtness BA. Hyperprogression after one dose of nivolumab in sinonasal cancer: A case report. The Laryngoscope 2019, 130: 907-910. PMID: 31058321, DOI: 10.1002/lary.28042.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalCarcinoma, Squamous CellDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNivolumabParanasal Sinus NeoplasmsConceptsImmune checkpoint inhibitorsDose of nivolumabSquamous cell carcinomaSinonasal cancerCell carcinomaDisease progressionMaxillary sinus squamous cell carcinomaSinus squamous cell carcinomaNeck squamous cell carcinomaComplete vision lossICI initiationCheckpoint inhibitorsFirst doseLytic metastasesDistal metastasisCase reportIntracranial invasionVision lossImproved outcomesHyperprogressionIndividual riskDoseNivolumabCarcinomaMetastasis
2018
Pembrolizumab versus methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab for recurrent or metastatic head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-040): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study
Cohen EEW, Soulières D, Le Tourneau C, Dinis J, Licitra L, Ahn MJ, Soria A, Machiels JP, Mach N, Mehra R, Burtness B, Zhang P, Cheng J, Swaby RF, Harrington KJ, investigators K, Acosta-Rivera M, Adkins D, Aghmesheh M, Ahn M, Airoldi M, Aleknavicius E, Al-Farhat Y, Algazi A, Almokadem S, Alyasova A, Bauman J, Benasso M, Berrocal A, Bray V, Burtness B, Caponigro F, Castro A, Cescon T, Chan K, Chaudhry A, Chauffert B, Cohen E, Csoszi T, De Boer J, Delord J, Dietz A, Dinis J, Dupuis C, Digue L, Erfan J, Alvarez Y, Evans M, Fidler M, Forster M, Friesland S, Ganti A, Geoffrois L, Grant C, Gruenwald V, Harrington K, Hoffmann T, Horvai G, Inciura A, Jang R, Jankowska P, Jimeno A, Joseph M, Ramiro A, Karaszewska B, Kawecki A, Keilholz U, Keller U, Kim S, Kocsis J, Kotecki N, Kozloff M, Lambea J, Landherr L, Lantsukhay Y, Lazarev S, Lee L, Le Tourneau C, Licitra L, Lifirenko I, Mach N, Martincic D, Matorin O, McGrath M, Machiels J, Mehra R, Misiukiewicz K, Morris J, Mufazalov F, Niu J, Srinivasan D, Segura P, Rauch D, Ribeiro M, Rodriguez C, Rolland F, Russo A, Ruzsa A, Sanches F, Shin S, Shtiveland M, Soulieres D, Soria A, Specenier P, Szekanecz E, Szota J, van Herpen C, Velez-Cortes H, Walsh W, Wilop S, Winterhalder R, Wojtukiewicz M, Wong D, Zandberg D. Pembrolizumab versus methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab for recurrent or metastatic head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-040): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. The Lancet 2018, 393: 156-167. PMID: 30509740, DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31999-8.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCetuximabDisease ProgressionDocetaxelDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMethotrexateMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckConceptsNeck squamous cell carcinomaSquamous cell carcinomaStandard of careTreatment-related adverse eventsCell carcinomaMetastatic headOverall survivalTreat populationAdverse eventsCommon treatment-related adverse eventsWorse treatment-related adverse eventsPlatinum-containing treatmentTreatment-related deathsMedian overall survivalWeb response systemEffective treatment optionFavorable safety profileEarly phase trialsTreatment of headSubsidiary of MerckManageable toxicityMeaningful prolongationAdvanced diseasePrimary endpointMetastatic disease
2016
Amidst the excitement: A cautionary tale of immunotherapy, pseudoprogression and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
Baxi SS, Dunn LA, Burtness BA. Amidst the excitement: A cautionary tale of immunotherapy, pseudoprogression and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncology 2016, 62: 147-148. PMID: 27776933, DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2016.10.007.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchCALGB 80403 (Alliance)/E1206: A Randomized Phase II Study of Three Chemotherapy Regimens Plus Cetuximab in Metastatic Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancers
Enzinger PC, Burtness BA, Niedzwiecki D, Ye X, Douglas K, Ilson DH, Villaflor VM, Cohen SJ, Mayer RJ, Venook A, Benson AB, Goldberg RM. CALGB 80403 (Alliance)/E1206: A Randomized Phase II Study of Three Chemotherapy Regimens Plus Cetuximab in Metastatic Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancers. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2016, 34: 2736-2742. PMID: 27382098, PMCID: PMC5019745, DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.65.5092.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCamptothecinCarcinoma, Squamous CellCetuximabCisplatinDisease ProgressionDisease-Free SurvivalEpirubicinEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagogastric JunctionFemaleFluorouracilHumansIrinotecanLeucovorinMaleMiddle AgedOrganoplatinum CompoundsSurvival RateTime FactorsTreatment FailureConceptsGastroesophageal junction cancerProgression-free survivalMetastatic esophagealJunction cancerOverall survivalTreatment failureResponse rateMedian progression-free survivalRandomized phase II studyContinuous infusion fluorouracilOptimal chemotherapy backboneTreatment-related deathsMedian overall survivalPhase II studyPrimary end pointCooperative group studiesPromising preclinical dataChemotherapy backboneChemotherapy regimensAdverse eventsII studySecondary outcomesMedian timeTreatment armsPreclinical data
2014
Phase II Study of Cetuximab in Combination with Cisplatin and Radiation in Unresectable, Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial E3303
Egloff AM, Lee JW, Langer CJ, Quon H, Vaezi A, Grandis JR, Seethala RR, Wang L, Shin DM, Argiris A, Yang D, Mehra R, Ridge JA, Patel UA, Burtness BA, Forastiere AA. Phase II Study of Cetuximab in Combination with Cisplatin and Radiation in Unresectable, Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial E3303. Clinical Cancer Research 2014, 20: 5041-5051. PMID: 25107914, PMCID: PMC4184913, DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-14-0051.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Squamous CellCetuximabCisplatinDisease ProgressionFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm StagingRadiotherapyRisk FactorsSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckTreatment OutcomeConceptsProgression-free survivalOverall survivalLA-SCCHNMaintenance cetuximabAdvanced squamous cell headMedian progression-free survivalTwo-year overall survivalNeck squamous cell carcinomaTumor human papillomavirus (HPV) statusGrade 5 toxicityMedian overall survivalMedian radiotherapy doseMost common gradeCycles of cisplatinHuman papillomavirus (HPV) statusPhase II studySquamous cell headTumor HPV statusLonger overall survivalSquamous cell carcinomaOropharyngeal primaryHPV statusII studyPrimary endpointProtocol treatmentPredicting survival in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma from TP53 mutation
Masica DL, Li S, Douville C, Manola J, Ferris RL, Burtness B, Forastiere AA, Koch WM, Chung CH, Karchin R. Predicting survival in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma from TP53 mutation. Human Genetics 2014, 134: 497-507. PMID: 25108461, PMCID: PMC4324386, DOI: 10.1007/s00439-014-1470-0.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2013
Extranodal Extension of Metastatic Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: Correlation with Biochemical Endpoints, Nodal Persistence, and Systemic Disease Progression
Lango M, Flieder D, Arrangoiz R, Veloski C, Yu JQ, Li T, Burtness B, Mehra R, Galloway T, Ridge JA. Extranodal Extension of Metastatic Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: Correlation with Biochemical Endpoints, Nodal Persistence, and Systemic Disease Progression. Thyroid 2013, 23: 1099-1105. PMID: 23421588, PMCID: PMC3770240, DOI: 10.1089/thy.2013.0027.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAutoantibodiesBiomarkersCarcinomaCarcinoma, PapillaryDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLogistic ModelsLymph NodesLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeck DissectionNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingOdds RatioPhiladelphiaProportional Hazards ModelsRadiotherapy, AdjuvantReoperationRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsThyroglobulinThyroid Cancer, PapillaryThyroid NeoplasmsThyroidectomyTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultConceptsComplete biochemical responseMetastatic papillary thyroid carcinomaSystemic disease progressionPapillary thyroid carcinomaExtranodal extensionDisease progressionRAI administrationUntreated patientsNeck dissectionTumor persistenceT4 classificationThyroid carcinomaLong-term clinical outcomesPresence of ENECenter cohort studyGross residual diseaseRadioactive iodine treatmentTherapeutic neck dissectionAnti-thyroglobulin antibodiesRecurrence/persistenceNational Cancer InstituteSuspicious imagingDistant diseaseNodal diseasePrior surgery
2011
A phase 2 trial of bortezomib followed by the addition of doxorubicin at progression in patients with recurrent or metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma of the head and neck
Argiris A, Ghebremichael M, Burtness B, Axelrod RS, Deconti RC, Forastiere AA. A phase 2 trial of bortezomib followed by the addition of doxorubicin at progression in patients with recurrent or metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer 2011, 117: 3374-3382. PMID: 21246525, PMCID: PMC3135694, DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25852.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAdenoid cystic carcinomaStable diseaseEvaluable patientsObjective responseCystic carcinomaEastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0Day 1Common distant metastatic siteGrade 3 sensory neuropathyMedian progression-free survivalMetastatic adenoid cystic carcinomaGrade 3 anorexiaPerformance status 0Phase 2 trialProgression-free survivalTime of progressionSingle-agent bortezomibCombination of bortezomibDistant metastatic sitesAddition of doxorubicinMeasurable diseaseStatus 0Disease stabilizationFrequent toxicitiesPrior therapy
2009
Phase II trial of docetaxel–irinotecan combination in advanced esophageal cancer
Burtness B, Gibson M, Egleston B, Mehra R, Thomas L, Sipples R, Quintanilla M, Lacy J, Watkins S, Murren JR, Forastiere AA. Phase II trial of docetaxel–irinotecan combination in advanced esophageal cancer. Annals Of Oncology 2009, 20: 1242-1248. PMID: 19429872, PMCID: PMC2699385, DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdn787.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAdvanced esophageal cancerPartial responseComplete responseEligible patientsEsophageal cancerEastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance statusMetastatic squamous cell carcinomaSafety of docetaxelPhase II trialSquamous cell carcinomaPrincipal toxic effectsAssessable patientsEsophagogastric cancerMeasurable diseaseToxic deathsII trialCN patientsMedian survivalPerformance statusNormal bilirubinPreclinical evidenceMedian timeCell carcinomaMyocardial infarctionTumor assessment
2007
Phase II Trial of Weekly Docetaxel/Irinotecan Combination in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
Burtness B, Thomas L, Sipples R, McGurk M, Salikooti S, Christoforou M, Mirto G, Salem R, Sosa J, Kloss R, Rahman Z, Chung G, Lacy J, Murren JR. Phase II Trial of Weekly Docetaxel/Irinotecan Combination in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer. The Cancer Journal 2007, 13: 257-262. PMID: 17762761, DOI: 10.1097/ppo.0b013e31813c1174.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAdvanced pancreatic cancerPancreatic cancerEligible patientsIrinotecan combinationPartial responseComplete responseEastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0Principal grade 3/4 toxicitiesWorld Health Organization criteriaSafety of docetaxelGrade 3/4 toxicitiesObjective response ratePerformance status 0One-year survivalPhase II trialCombination of docetaxelNormal bilirubin levelsEvaluable patientsFebrile neutropeniaMeasurable diseaseStatus 0Toxic deathsUnresectable diseaseII trialRecurrent disease
2005
Cetuximab and Cisplatin for Chemotherapy-Refractory Squamous Cell Cancer of the Head and Neck
Burtness B. Cetuximab and Cisplatin for Chemotherapy-Refractory Squamous Cell Cancer of the Head and Neck. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2005, 23: 5440-5442. PMID: 16009959, DOI: 10.1200/jco.2005.02.002.Peer-Reviewed Original Research