2020
Long‐term serial functional evaluation after implantation of the Fantom sirolimus‐eluting bioresorbable coronary scaffold
Saito Y, Cristea E, Bouras G, Abizaid A, Lutz M, Carrié D, Weber‐Albers J, Dudek D, Anderson J, Lansky A, Investigators T. Long‐term serial functional evaluation after implantation of the Fantom sirolimus‐eluting bioresorbable coronary scaffold. Catheterization And Cardiovascular Interventions 2020, 97: 431-436. PMID: 32077590, DOI: 10.1002/ccd.28804.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPost-percutaneous coronary interventionQuantitative flow ratioBioresorbable coronary scaffoldTarget vessel revascularizationVessel revascularizationFunctional ischemiaStable coronary artery diseaseTime of revascularizationCoronary artery diseaseFractional flow reserveQFR assessmentII trialAngiographic outcomesCoronary interventionUnstable anginaArtery diseaseQFR valueWire-based fractional flow reserveSignificant lesionsFlow reservePatientsTarget vesselRevascularizationQFR analysisFunctional evaluation
2002
Balloon‐based radiation therapy for treatment of in‐stent restenosis in human coronary arteries: Results from the BRITE I study
Waksman R, Buchbinder M, Reisman M, Lansky AJ, Trauthen B, Whiting J, Li A. Balloon‐based radiation therapy for treatment of in‐stent restenosis in human coronary arteries: Results from the BRITE I study. Catheterization And Cardiovascular Interventions 2002, 57: 286-294. PMID: 12410499, DOI: 10.1002/ccd.10359.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedArteriesBlood Vessel ProsthesisCatheterizationCoronary AngiographyCoronary RestenosisDose-Response Relationship, RadiationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesRadiotherapy, Computer-AssistedReoperationRisk FactorsStentsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeConceptsStent restenosisRadiation therapyMajor adverse cardiac eventsAdverse cardiac eventsIntracoronary radiation therapyStudy eligibility criteriaStent restenosis resultsInstances of deathHuman coronary arteriesBinary restenosisRepeat PTCAPrimary endpointCardiac eventsClinical restenosisEmergency surgeryLate complicationsAngioplasty siteRestenosis rateRecurrence rateTotal occlusionConventional therapyCoronary arteryEligibility criteriaLate thrombosisTarget vesselComparison of Angioplasty with Stenting, with or without Abciximab, in Acute Myocardial Infarction
Stone GW, Grines CL, Cox DA, Garcia E, Tcheng JE, Griffin JJ, Guagliumi G, Stuckey T, Turco M, Carroll JD, Rutherford BD, Lansky AJ. Comparison of Angioplasty with Stenting, with or without Abciximab, in Acute Myocardial Infarction. New England Journal Of Medicine 2002, 346: 957-966. PMID: 11919304, DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa013404.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAbciximabAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAngioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryAntibodies, MonoclonalCombined Modality TherapyCoronary AngiographyFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin Fab FragmentsMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionMyocardial ReperfusionPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPlatelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa ComplexProspective StudiesRecurrenceStentsStrokeConceptsPrimary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplastyAcute myocardial infarctionPercent of patientsPrimary end pointInfarct-related arteryRate of deathMyocardial infarctionAbciximab therapyReperfusion strategyPlatelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitorsGlycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitorsTarget vesselIIb/IIIa inhibitorsPercutaneous transluminal coronary angioplastyEnd pointComposite of deathTarget vessel revascularizationIschemia-driven revascularizationTransluminal coronary angioplastyComparison of AngioplastyAbciximab useRecurrent ischemiaExperienced centersCoronary angioplastyCoronary stenting