2019
Treating Post-Angioplasty Dissection in the Femoropopliteal Arteries Using the Tack Endovascular System 12-Month Results From the TOBA II Study
Gray WA, Cardenas JA, Brodmann M, Werner M, Bernardo NI, George JC, Lansky A. Treating Post-Angioplasty Dissection in the Femoropopliteal Arteries Using the Tack Endovascular System 12-Month Results From the TOBA II Study. JACC Cardiovascular Interventions 2019, 12: 2375-2384. PMID: 31806218, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.08.005.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedAngioplasty, BalloonBlood Vessel ProsthesisBlood Vessel Prosthesis ImplantationEuropeFemaleFemoral ArteryHumansMaleMiddle AgedPeripheral Arterial DiseasePopliteal ArteryProspective StudiesProsthesis DesignRisk FactorsStentsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesVascular Access DevicesVascular PatencyVascular System InjuriesConceptsProximal popliteal arteryDrug-coated balloonsSuperficial femoral arteryPlain balloonPopliteal arteryFemoral arteryTack Endovascular SystemLong-term outcomesDCB angioplastyEfficacy endpointPrimary patencyResidual stenosisRestenotic lesionsMulticenter studyFemoropopliteal arteriesEndovascular SystemAngioplastyArteryClassification 2DissectionLesionsBalloonStenosisPatencyPatients
2017
Novel Nitinol Stent for Lesions up to 24 cm in the Superficial Femoral and Proximal Popliteal Arteries: 24-Month Results From the TIGRIS Randomized Trial
Laird JR, Zeller T, Loewe C, Chamberlin J, Begg R, Schneider PA, Nanjundappa A, Bunch F, Schultz S, Harlin S, Lansky A, Jaff MR. Novel Nitinol Stent for Lesions up to 24 cm in the Superficial Femoral and Proximal Popliteal Arteries: 24-Month Results From the TIGRIS Randomized Trial. Journal Of Endovascular Therapy 2017, 25: 68-78. PMID: 29285955, DOI: 10.1177/1526602817749242.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTarget lesion revascularizationMajor adverse eventsProximal popliteal arteryPrimary patencyPopliteal arteryStent fractureAnkle/brachial indexPrimary safety endpointPrimary efficacy endpointTreatment of lesionsQuality of lifeSame time pointsLesion revascularizationRutherford categoryEfficacy endpointSafety endpointSecondary endpointsAdverse eventsBrachial indexSuperficial femoralProcedure successFracture ratesClinical successControl groupArtery
2012
Nitinol Stent Implantation vs. Balloon Angioplasty for Lesions in the Superficial Femoral and Proximal Popliteal Arteries of Patients With Claudication: Three-Year Follow-up From the RESILIENT Randomized Trial
Laird JR, Katzen BT, Scheinert D, Lammer J, Carpenter J, Buchbinder M, Dave R, Ansel G, Lansky A, Cristea E, Collins TJ, Goldstein J, Cao AY, Jaff MR. Nitinol Stent Implantation vs. Balloon Angioplasty for Lesions in the Superficial Femoral and Proximal Popliteal Arteries of Patients With Claudication: Three-Year Follow-up From the RESILIENT Randomized Trial. Journal Of Endovascular Therapy 2012, 19: 1-9. PMID: 22313193, DOI: 10.1583/11-3627.1.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedAlloysAngioplasty, BalloonArterial Occlusive DiseasesChi-Square DistributionConstriction, PathologicEuropeFemaleFemoral ArteryHumansIntermittent ClaudicationKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedPopliteal ArteryPredictive Value of TestsProsthesis DesignRadiographyRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsStentsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUltrasonography, Doppler, DuplexUnited StatesVascular PatencyConceptsTarget lesion revascularizationBalloon angioplastyAngioplasty groupStent groupProximal popliteal artery lesionsGood long-term resultsNitinol stent implantationProximal popliteal arteryMajor adverse eventsLong-term resultsPopliteal artery lesionsShort-term patencyStent fracture rateThree-year followLesion revascularizationPrimary nitinolWithdrew consentIntermittent claudicationAdverse eventsArtery lesionsFemoropopliteal lesionsMulticenter trialPopliteal arteryPrimary implantationSuperficial femoral
2010
Response to Letter Regarding Article, “Nitinol Stent Implantation Versus Balloon Angioplasty for Lesions in the Superficial Femoral Artery and Proximal Popliteal Artery
Laird J, Katzen B, Scheinert D, Lammer J, Carpenter J, Buchbinder M, Dave R, Ansel G, Lansky A, Cristea E, Collins T, Goldstein J, Jaff M. Response to Letter Regarding Article, “Nitinol Stent Implantation Versus Balloon Angioplasty for Lesions in the Superficial Femoral Artery and Proximal Popliteal Artery. Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions 2010, 3: e23. DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.110.958181.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchNitinol Stent Implantation Versus Balloon Angioplasty for Lesions in the Superficial Femoral Artery and Proximal Popliteal Artery
Laird JR, Katzen BT, Scheinert D, Lammer J, Carpenter J, Buchbinder M, Dave R, Ansel G, Lansky A, Cristea E, Collins TJ, Goldstein J, Jaff MR. Nitinol Stent Implantation Versus Balloon Angioplasty for Lesions in the Superficial Femoral Artery and Proximal Popliteal Artery. Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions 2010, 3: 267-276. PMID: 20484101, DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.109.903468.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsSuperficial femoral arteryProximal popliteal arteryTarget lesion revascularizationAngioplasty groupStent groupFemoral arteryLesion revascularizationPopliteal arteryBalloon angioplastyPrimary patencyAngiographic resultsBetter acute angiographic resultsProvisional stent implantationSuboptimal angiographic resultsEndovascular treatment strategiesFlow-limiting dissectionPercutaneous transluminal angioplastyAcute angiographic resultsTotal lesion lengthLoss of patencySuperficial femoral artery (SFA) stentingSelf-expanding nitinolBailout stentingIntermittent claudicationPrimary stenting