2024
Surgical Risk Does Not Predict Ischemic Stroke or Acute Infarction After TAVR: Results of a Patient-Level Pooled Analysis
Grubman D, Lansky A, Dwyer M, Zivadinov R, Pietras C, Nazif T, Moses J, Shah T, Gambone L, Leon M, Forrest J, Vora A, Parise H, Messé S. Surgical Risk Does Not Predict Ischemic Stroke or Acute Infarction After TAVR: Results of a Patient-Level Pooled Analysis. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine 2024, 65: 80. DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.04.179.Peer-Reviewed Original Research800.09 Surgical Risk Does Not Predict Ischemic Stroke or Acute Infarction After TAVR: Results of a Patient-Level Pooled Analysis
Grubman D, Lansky A, Dwyer M, Zivadinov R, Pietras C, Nazif T, Moses J, Shah T, Gambone L, Leon M, Forrest J, Vora A, Parise H, Messé S. 800.09 Surgical Risk Does Not Predict Ischemic Stroke or Acute Infarction After TAVR: Results of a Patient-Level Pooled Analysis. JACC Cardiovascular Interventions 2024, 17: s67-s68. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.01.234.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2018
Sex disparities in acute myocardial infarction care and outcomes
Gul B, Kozuma K, Haimi I, Zhao W, Simonton C, Ying S, Buda A, Mehta S, Baumbach A, Lansky A. Sex disparities in acute myocardial infarction care and outcomes. Catheterization And Cardiovascular Interventions 2018, 92: e341-e347. PMID: 29745453, DOI: 10.1002/ccd.27622.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedChinaClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHemorrhageHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedNon-ST Elevated Myocardial InfarctionPercutaneous Coronary InterventionProduct Surveillance, PostmarketingRegistriesRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSex FactorsST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionStentsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesConceptsMajor adverse cardiac eventsAcute myocardial infarctionPercutaneous coronary interventionTarget vessel failureCause mortalityXience V stentMajor bleedingUS patientsHigher major adverse cardiac eventsSetting of AMIContemporary percutaneous coronary interventionAcute myocardial infarction careDevice-specific outcomesAdverse cardiac eventsMyocardial infarction carePost-market registryCause deathCardiac eventsCoronary interventionMultivariable analysisFemale sexMyocardial infarctionPatient levelSex disparitiesPatients
2010
A pooled gender based analysis comparing the XIENCE V(R) everolimus-eluting stent and the TAXUS paclitaxel-eluting stent in male and female patients with coronary artery disease, results of the SPIRIT II and SPIRIT III studies: two-year analysis.
Seth A, Serruys PW, Lansky A, Hermiller J, Onuma Y, Miquel-Hebert K, Yu S, Veldhof S, Sood P, Sudhir K, Stone GW. A pooled gender based analysis comparing the XIENCE V(R) everolimus-eluting stent and the TAXUS paclitaxel-eluting stent in male and female patients with coronary artery disease, results of the SPIRIT II and SPIRIT III studies: two-year analysis. EuroIntervention 2010, 5: 788-94. PMID: 20142192, DOI: 10.4244/eijv5i7a132.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedAngioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryCardiovascular AgentsCoronary AngiographyCoronary RestenosisCoronary StenosisDrug-Eluting StentsEverolimusFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicMyocardial InfarctionPaclitaxelProsthesis DesignRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSex FactorsSingle-Blind MethodSirolimusThrombosisTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeConceptsMajor adverse cardiac eventsPaclitaxel-eluting stentsTAXUS paclitaxel-eluting stentTarget vessel failureAngiographic late lossLate lossDiameter stenosisIII studyPooled analysisSPIRIT IIAdverse cardiac eventsSegment late lossStent late lossCoronary artery diseaseEES groupCardiac eventsArtery diseaseFemale patientsPES groupPatient levelClinical dataXIENCE VStent typeTwo-year analysisWomen