2023
Predictors of Cerebral Embolic Debris During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: The SafePass 2 First-in-Human Study
Grubman D, Ahmad Y, Leipsic J, Blanke P, Pasupati S, Webster M, Nazif T, Parise H, Lansky A. Predictors of Cerebral Embolic Debris During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: The SafePass 2 First-in-Human Study. The American Journal Of Cardiology 2023, 207: 28-34. PMID: 37722198, DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.08.137.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTranscatheter aortic valve replacementAortic valve replacementValve replacementAtrial fibrillationHuman studiesEmbolic protection device useHigh embolic riskPrimary end pointHigh-risk patientsIndependent core laboratorySelf-expanding valvesComputed tomography angiographyProtection device useCerebral embolizationCerebrovascular eventsEmbolic riskAcute thrombusEmbolic burdenAngiography featuresTechnical successTomography angiographyEmbolic debrisValve useCore laboratoryEnd point
2022
Angiographic Lesion Discordance in Women Presenting With Ischemic Heart Disease: Comparison of Visual Assessment, Quantitative Coronary Angiography, and Quantitative Flow Ratio.
Gitto M, Saito Y, Taoutel R, Schneider MD, Papoutsidakis N, Ardito S, Henry G, Cristea E, Lansky AJ, Altin SE. Angiographic Lesion Discordance in Women Presenting With Ischemic Heart Disease: Comparison of Visual Assessment, Quantitative Coronary Angiography, and Quantitative Flow Ratio. Journal Of Invasive Cardiology 2022, 34: e202-e209. PMID: 35089162, DOI: 10.25270/jic/21.00146.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsQuantitative coronary angiographyIschemic heart diseaseQuantitative flow ratioStress perfusion imagingDiameter stenosisCoronary angiographyIschemic symptomsCoronary revascularizationHeart diseasePerfusion imagingStenosis severityIndependent core laboratoryCohort of womenVisual assessmentCoronary stenosis severityConsecutive patientsAngiographic severityCoronary stenosisLesion assessmentClinical practiceCore laboratoryLesionsAngiographyWomenBlinded operators
2017
What is the best ST-segment recovery parameter to predict clinical outcome and myocardial infarct size? Amplitude, speed, and completeness of ST-segment recovery after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
Kuijt WJ, Green CL, Verouden NJW, Haeck JDE, Tzivoni D, Koch KT, Stone GW, Lansky AJ, Broderick S, Tijssen JGP, de Winter RJ, Roe MT, Krucoff MW. What is the best ST-segment recovery parameter to predict clinical outcome and myocardial infarct size? Amplitude, speed, and completeness of ST-segment recovery after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Journal Of Electrocardiology 2017, 50: 952-959. PMID: 29153151, DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2017.04.009.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsST-segment elevation myocardial infarctionST-segment recoveryPrimary percutaneous coronary interventionPercutaneous coronary interventionElevation myocardial infarctionInfarct sizeCoronary interventionMyocardial infarctionHolter ECG monitoringMyocardial infarct sizeSingle photon emissionMultivariable adjustmentClinical outcomesRisk factorsClinical trialsNoninvasive biomarkersCore laboratoryMechanistic correlatesMortalityECG monitoringInfarctionRecovery parametersST parametersInterventionOutcomes
2011
SYNTAX Score Reproducibility and Variability Between Interventional Cardiologists, Core Laboratory Technicians, and Quantitative Coronary Measurements
Généreux P, Palmerini T, Caixeta A, Cristea E, Mehran R, Sanchez R, Lazar D, Jankovic I, Corral MD, Dressler O, Fahy MP, Parise H, Lansky AJ, Stone GW. SYNTAX Score Reproducibility and Variability Between Interventional Cardiologists, Core Laboratory Technicians, and Quantitative Coronary Measurements. Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions 2011, 4: 553-561. PMID: 22028472, DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.111.961862.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsQuantitative coronary angiographyAngiographic core laboratorySYNTAX scoreInterventional cardiologistsComplex coronary artery diseaseCardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trialPercutaneous coronary interventionCoronary artery diseaseSmall vessel diseaseFuture clinical trialsQuantitative coronary measurementsNumber of lesionsAdditional angiogramsCoronary interventionArtery diseaseCoronary angiographySurgery TrialClinical trialsClinical utilityCoronary measurementsIntensive training sessionCore laboratoryLesion typeRoutine practiceScore reproducibilityDiscrepancy in the assessment of jailed side branch lesions by visual estimation and quantitative coronary angiographic analysis
Shin D, Koo B, Waseda K, Park KW, Kim H, Corral M, Lansky A, Honda Y, Fearon WF, Fitzgerald PJ. Discrepancy in the assessment of jailed side branch lesions by visual estimation and quantitative coronary angiographic analysis. Catheterization And Cardiovascular Interventions 2011, 78: 720-726. PMID: 22025472, DOI: 10.1002/ccd.23049.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMean minimum lumen diameterQuantitative coronary angiographyFractional flow reserveSide branch lesionsDiameter stenosisSB lesionsIntraclass correlation coefficientBranch lesionsQuantitative coronary angiographic analysisCoronary angiographic analysisMinimum lumen diameterVisual estimationCoronary angiographyPressure trialAngiographic analysisAngiographic assessmentFlow reserveCore laboratoryStenosisReference diameterLesionsLumen diameterLesion lengthFunctional significance
2010
Side branch occlusion with everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents: three-year results from the SPIRIT III randomised trial.
Lansky AJ, Yaqub M, Hermiller JB, Smith RS, Farhat N, Caputo R, Williams JE, Sanz M, Koo K, Sood P, Sudhir K, Stone GW. Side branch occlusion with everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents: three-year results from the SPIRIT III randomised trial. EuroIntervention 2010, 6 Suppl J: j44-52. PMID: 21930490, DOI: 10.4244/eijv6supja8.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedAngioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryCardiovascular AgentsCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary RestenosisDrug-Eluting StentsEverolimusFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionPaclitaxelProspective StudiesProsthesis DesignRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSingle-Blind MethodSirolimusTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesConceptsPeriprocedural myocardial infarctionSide branch occlusionBranch occlusionMyocardial infarctionStent placementDrug-eluting stent placementIndependent angiographic core laboratoryPaclitaxel-eluting stent placementLong-term adverse outcomesSPIRIT III trialPaclitaxel-eluting stentsAngiographic core laboratoryThree-year resultsLower ratesSide branchesEES armIII trialsMI ratesIndependent predictorsClinical outcomesAdverse outcomesProcedural angiogramsGrade 0Stent typeCore laboratory
2002
7-Hexanoyltaxol–Eluting Stent for Prevention of Neointimal Growth
Kataoka T, Grube E, Honda Y, Morino Y, Hur SH, Bonneau HN, Colombo A, Di Mario C, Guagliumi G, Hauptmann KE, Pitney MR, Lansky AJ, Stertzer SH, Yock PG, Fitzgerald PJ. 7-Hexanoyltaxol–Eluting Stent for Prevention of Neointimal Growth. Circulation 2002, 106: 1788-1793. PMID: 12356631, DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.0000031734.11420.1c.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsBare metal stentsNeointimal growthIntravascular ultrasoundDe novo coronary lesionsAdjacent reference segmentsNovo coronary lesionsIndependent core laboratoryHuman feasibility studyNeointimal tissue growthIVUS substudyUnhealed dissectionConventional mechanical treatmentMulticenter trialCoronary lesionsRestenosis rateAtherosclerotic diseaseIntracoronary brachytherapyIVUS analysisNeointimal responseLong-term benefitsNeointimal thickeningStented segmentsCore laboratoryMetal stentsReference segments
1997
Reliability of the Quantitative Angiographic Measurements in the New Approaches to Coronary Intervention (NACI) Registry: A Comparison of Clinical Site and Repeated Angiographic Core Laboratory Readings
Popma J, Lansky A, Yeh W, Kennard E, Keller M, Merritt A, DeFalco R, Desai A, Pacera J, Schnabel J, Niedermeyer V, Baim D, Detre K. Reliability of the Quantitative Angiographic Measurements in the New Approaches to Coronary Intervention (NACI) Registry: A Comparison of Clinical Site and Repeated Angiographic Core Laboratory Readings. The American Journal Of Cardiology 1997, 80: 19k-25k. PMID: 9409689, DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)00761-3.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPercentage diameter stenosisAngiographic core laboratoryCoronary Intervention RegistryQuantitative angiographic measurementsDiameter stenosisProximal vessel tortuosityCore laboratoryClinical sitesIntervention RegistryLaboratory readingsVessel tortuosityAngiographic measurementsPostprocedural minimal lumen diameterReference vessel diameterMinimal lumen diameterLesion calciumLesion ulcerationAngiographic resultsLesion eccentricityLesion morphologyNACI registryLumen diameterStenosisDigital caliper methodRegistry