2022
Randomized Trial of Chocolate Touch Compared With Lutonix Drug-Coated Balloon in Femoropopliteal Lesions (Chocolate Touch Study)
Shishehbor MH, Zeller T, Werner M, Brodmann M, Parise H, Holden A, Lichtenberg M, Parikh SA, Kashyap VS, Pietras C, Tirziu D, Ardakani S, Beschorner U, Krishnan P, Niazi KA, Wali AU, Lansky AJ. Randomized Trial of Chocolate Touch Compared With Lutonix Drug-Coated Balloon in Femoropopliteal Lesions (Chocolate Touch Study). Circulation 2022, 145: 1645-1654. PMID: 35377157, DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.122.059646.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsLutonix drug-coated balloonDrug-coated balloonsEnd pointPrimary efficacy end pointPrimary safety end pointIndependent clinical events committeeIschemic rest painPrimary efficacy rateEfficacy end pointPrimary end pointSafety end pointClinical events committeeMajor adverse eventsRate of restenosisDrug-Coated BalloonNoninferiority end pointSafety event rateAverage lesion lengthMajor amputationPopliteal diseaseRest painBailout stentingEfficacy ratePrimary patencyAdverse events
2019
Safety and Effectiveness of Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy for Treatment of Severely Calcified Coronary Stenoses
Ali ZA, Nef H, Escaned J, Werner N, Banning AP, Hill JM, De Bruyne B, Montorfano M, Lefevre T, Stone GW, Crowley A, Matsumura M, Maehara A, Lansky AJ, Fajadet J, Di Mario C. Safety and Effectiveness of Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy for Treatment of Severely Calcified Coronary Stenoses. Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions 2019, 12: e008434. PMID: 31553205, DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.119.008434.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedAged, 80 and overCardiac CatheterizationCoronary AngiographyCoronary StenosisEuropeFemaleHumansLithotripsyMaleMiddle AgedPatient SafetyPercutaneous Coronary InterventionProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexStentsTime FactorsTomography, Optical CoherenceTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesVascular CalcificationConceptsSevere coronary artery calcificationCoronary artery calcificationMajor adverse cardiac eventsAdverse cardiac eventsPrimary end pointIntravascular lithotripsyOptical coherence tomographyCardiac eventsStent implantationPlaque fractureHospital major adverse cardiac eventsNon-Q-wave myocardial infarctionOptical coherence tomography substudyIndependent clinical events committeeCoherence tomographyDrug-eluting stent implantationEnd pointCoronary intravascular lithotripsyClinical events committeeHigh procedural successIndependent core laboratoryAcute luminal gainPost-approval studiesMechanism of actionCalcium fracture
2018
Acute and one-year clinical outcomes following implantation of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: the ABSORB UK Registry.
Baumbach A, Zaman A, West NEJ, O'Kane P, Egred M, Johnson T, Wheatcroft S, Bowles R, de Belder A, Bouras G, Lansky A, Hill J, Mathur A, de Belder MA, Banning AP. Acute and one-year clinical outcomes following implantation of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: the ABSORB UK Registry. EuroIntervention 2018, 13: 1554-1560. PMID: 29131802, DOI: 10.4244/eij-d-17-00886.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAbsorbable ImplantsAcute Coronary SyndromeAdultClinical Decision-MakingCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary ThrombosisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SelectionPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPractice Patterns, Physicians'Product Surveillance, PostmarketingProspective StudiesProsthesis DesignRegistriesRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUnited KingdomConceptsBioresorbable vascular scaffoldDe novo coronary lesionsOne-year clinical outcomesIndependent clinical events committeeMajor adverse cardiac eventsAbsorb bioresorbable vascular scaffoldCareful implantation techniqueAdverse cardiac eventsNovo coronary lesionsTarget lesion failureAcute coronary syndromeClinical events committeeB2/CCareful patient selectionContemporary drug-eluting stentsDrug-eluting stentsVascular scaffoldsSmall vessel sizeDefinite STCoronary syndromeLesion failureCardiac eventsPatient ageReal-world practiceBVS implantation