O008/#785 A multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase 3 study to compare the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib in combination with pembrolizumab vs treatment of physician’s choice in patients with advanced endometrial cancer: study 309/keynote-775
Makker V, Colombo N, Herráez A, Santin A, Colomba E, Miller D, Fujiwara K, Pignata S, Baron-Hay S, Ray-Coquard I, Shapira R, Ushijima K, Sakata J, Yonemori K, Kim Y, Guerra E, Sanli U, Mccormack M, Huang J, Smith A. O008/#785 A multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase 3 study to compare the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib in combination with pembrolizumab vs treatment of physician’s choice in patients with advanced endometrial cancer: study 309/keynote-775. International Journal Of Gynecological Cancer 2021, 31: a4-a5. DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-igcs.8.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchTreatment-emergent adverse eventsAdvanced endometrial cancerObjective response rateEndometrial cancerPhysician's choiceCommon treatment-emergent adverse eventsPrior platinum-based chemotherapy regimenPhase 3 study resultsPlatinum-based chemotherapy regimenPrior platinum-based chemotherapyDNA mismatch repair (MMR) statusBlinded independent central reviewPhase 1b/2 studySafety of lenvatinibKey secondary endpointMedian treatment durationAdvanced endometrial carcinomaPhase 3 studyPlatinum-based chemotherapyIndependent central reviewPlatinum-based therapyMismatch repair statusEligible ptsRECIST v1.1Adjuvant settingPrognostic impact of mismatch repair deficiency in high- and low-intermediate-risk, early-stage endometrial cancer following vaginal brachytherapy
Li JY, Park HS, Huang GS, Young MR, Ratner E, Santin A, Damast S. Prognostic impact of mismatch repair deficiency in high- and low-intermediate-risk, early-stage endometrial cancer following vaginal brachytherapy. Gynecologic Oncology 2021, 163: 557-562. PMID: 34602287, DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.09.018.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRecurrence-free survivalEndometrioid endometrial cancerVaginal brachytherapyPMMR patientsOverall survivalEEC patientsEndometrial cancerExact testThree-year recurrence-free survivalEarly-stage endometrial cancerCox proportional hazards regressionPoor recurrence-free survivalAdjuvant vaginal brachytherapyThree-year OSMultivariable Cox regressionLympho-vascular invasionSignificant prognostic variablesProportional hazards regressionLog-rank testKaplan-Meier estimatesDeficient mismatch repairMismatch repair statusFisher's exact testMismatch repair deficiencyDMMR statusA multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase III study to compare the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib in combination with pembrolizumab versus treatment of physician's choice in patients with advanced endometrial cancer
Makker V, Colombo N, Herráez A, Santin A, Colomba E, Miller D, Fujiwara K, Pignata S, Baron-Hay S, Ray-Coquard I, Shapira-Frommer R, Ushijima K, Sakata J, Yonemori K, Kim Y, Guerra E, Sanli U, McCormack M, Huang J, Smith A, Keefe S, Dutta L, Orlowski R, Lorusso D. A multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase III study to compare the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib in combination with pembrolizumab versus treatment of physician's choice in patients with advanced endometrial cancer. Gynecologic Oncology 2021, 162: s4. DOI: 10.1016/s0090-8258(21)00657-0.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchTreatment-emergent adverse eventsAdvanced endometrial cancerObjective response rateEndometrial cancerPhysician's choiceCommon treatment-emergent adverse eventsGrade treatment-emergent adverse eventsPrior platinum-based chemotherapy regimenPhase III study resultsPlatinum-based chemotherapy regimenPrior platinum-based chemotherapyDNA mismatch repair (MMR) statusBlinded independent central reviewPhase 1b/2 studySafety of lenvatinibKey secondary endpointMedian treatment durationAdvanced endometrial carcinomaPlatinum-based chemotherapyIndependent central reviewPlatinum-based therapyMismatch repair statusAdjuvant settingChemotherapy regimenECOG PS