2023
The reliability and validity of the revised Green et al. paranoid thoughts scale in individuals at clinical high‐risk for psychosis
Williams T, Walker E, Strauss G, Woods S, Powers A, Corlett P, Schiffman J, Waltz J, Gold J, Silverstein S, Ellman L, Zinbarg R, Mittal V. The reliability and validity of the revised Green et al. paranoid thoughts scale in individuals at clinical high‐risk for psychosis. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 2023, 147: 623-633. PMID: 36905387, PMCID: PMC10463775, DOI: 10.1111/acps.13545.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsHumansInterpersonal RelationsParanoid DisordersPsychotic DisordersReproducibility of ResultsSelf ReportConceptsCHR individualsClinical controlFull psychosisHealthy controlsGeneral populationPsychosis symptomsCHR participantsPoor social functioningGreen Paranoid Thoughts ScalePsychosisGroup differencesSocial functioningConfirmatory factor analysisParanoid Thoughts ScaleInterview measuresSeverity continuumTwo-factor structureCritical populationSelf-report measuresPresent studyDiscriminant validityPsychometric indicesParanoid thoughtsIndividualsParticipants
2019
Does hallucination perceptual modality impact psychosis risk?
Niles H, Walsh B, Woods S, Powers A. Does hallucination perceptual modality impact psychosis risk? Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 2019, 140: 360-370. PMID: 31355420, PMCID: PMC6752971, DOI: 10.1111/acps.13078.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsClinical high riskPerceptual abnormalitiesPsychosis riskNon-verbal contentAuditory perceptual abnormalitiesIndividuals ages 12Verbal experienceAuditory experienceCHR individualsThought contentCHR sampleUnusual thought contentPredictive validityAuditory scoresGustatory componentsAge 12Meeting criteriaPsychotic disordersPhenomenological aspectsInterview notesPsychosisConversion riskScoresIndividualsExperience