Reliability, Validity, Epidemiology, and Cultural Variation of the Structured Interview for Psychosis-Risk Syndromes (SIPS) and the Scale of Psychosis-Risk Symptoms (SOPS)
Woods S, Walsh B, Powers A, McGlashan T. Reliability, Validity, Epidemiology, and Cultural Variation of the Structured Interview for Psychosis-Risk Syndromes (SIPS) and the Scale of Psychosis-Risk Symptoms (SOPS). 2019, 85-113. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-17336-4_5.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPsychosis risk syndromePsychosis risk symptomsClinical high-risk syndromeHigh-risk syndromeStructured interviewsInter-rater reliabilityCHR casesSeverity ScaleSIPS diagnosesEpidemiology studiesTotal scoreSyndromeSymptom subtypesCHR sampleFavorable psychometric propertiesSymptomsPsychometric propertiesDiagnostic instrumentDiscriminant validityMedian inter-rater reliabilityGeneral itemsEpidemiologyPrevalencePsychosisSubtypesDoes hallucination perceptual modality impact psychosis risk?
Niles H, Walsh B, Woods S, Powers A. Does hallucination perceptual modality impact psychosis risk? Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 2019, 140: 360-370. PMID: 31355420, PMCID: PMC6752971, DOI: 10.1111/acps.13078.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsClinical high riskPerceptual abnormalitiesPsychosis riskNon-verbal contentAuditory perceptual abnormalitiesIndividuals ages 12Verbal experienceAuditory experienceCHR individualsThought contentCHR sampleUnusual thought contentPredictive validityAuditory scoresGustatory componentsAge 12Meeting criteriaPsychotic disordersPhenomenological aspectsInterview notesPsychosisConversion riskScoresIndividualsExperience