2024
Evaluating Molecular and Clinical Predictors in Myelodysplastic Syndromes through Machine Learning Integration
Mosquera Orgueira A, Perez Encinas M, Pérez Míguez C, Crucitti D, Piñeiro Fiel M, Díaz Varela N, Mora E, Díaz-Beyá M, Montoro M, Pomares H, Ramos Ortega F, Tormo M, Jerez A, Nomdedeu J, de Miguel Sanchez C, Arenillas L, Carcel Corella P, Cedena Romero M, Xicoy B, Rivero M, Del Orbe Barreto R, Bewersdorf J, Stahl M, Stempel J, Kewan T, Zeidan A, Diez-Campelo M, Valcarcel D. Evaluating Molecular and Clinical Predictors in Myelodysplastic Syndromes through Machine Learning Integration. Blood 2024, 144: 6683-6683. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2024-198114.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLeukemia-free survivalPredictors of OSMyelodysplastic syndromeOverall survivalIPSS-MC-indexFLT3-ITDPredictors of leukemia-free survivalRevised International Prognostic Scoring SystemPrognostication of myelodysplastic syndromesInternational Prognostic Scoring SystemPrognostic Scoring SystemCox regression analysisMolecular dataClinical trial designIPSS-RGenetic variabilityMLL-PTDRandom survival forestPrognostic landscapePrognostic significanceLaboratory parametersAffected prognosisClinical predictorsClinical indicesHealth-Related Quality of Life of Luspatercept Versus Epoetin Alfa in Red Blood Cell Transfusion-Dependent Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Results from the Final Datacut of the Phase 3 COMMANDS Study
Oliva E, Platzbecker U, Della Porta M, Garcia-Manero G, Santini V, Fenaux P, Shortt J, Komrokji R, Pelligra C, Guo S, Yucel A, Glassberg M, Eliason L, Hnoosh A, Miteva D, Rose S, Kreitz S, Sekeres M, Zeidan A. Health-Related Quality of Life of Luspatercept Versus Epoetin Alfa in Red Blood Cell Transfusion-Dependent Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Results from the Final Datacut of the Phase 3 COMMANDS Study. Blood 2024, 144: 3216. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2024-198374.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesReduction of red blood cellsFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-AnemiaClinically important differenceEpoetin alfaMyelodysplastic syndromeRevised International Prognostic Scoring SystemInternational Prognostic Scoring SystemHealth-related qualityClinically important difference thresholdImprovement of cytopeniasMean haemoglobin increaseRBC transfusion independencePrognostic Scoring SystemPhase 3 studyStratified Cox proportional hazard regressionsFront-line treatmentOnset of improvementQLQ-C30Cox proportional hazards regressionEORTC QLQ-C30Treatment of anemiaProportional hazards regressionSuperior treatment effectsPost-baseline assessmentA Phase 2B, Open-Label Multicenter Study of Tebapivat (AG-946), a Potent Pyruvate Kinase Activator, in Patients with Anemia Due to Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Zeidan A, Sekeres M, Al-Samkari H, Carraway H, DeZern A, Mittelman M, Little M, Beynon V, Dai X, Sommakia S, Despotovic J, Patel P, Dibacco M, Fattizzo B, Stein E, Sallman D, Kulasekararaj A, Platzbecker U, Fenaux P. A Phase 2B, Open-Label Multicenter Study of Tebapivat (AG-946), a Potent Pyruvate Kinase Activator, in Patients with Anemia Due to Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes. Blood 2024, 144: 6708-6708. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2024-203073.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLower-risk MDSErythropoiesis-stimulating agentsLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesRed blood cell unitsMyelodysplastic syndromeProportion of patientsDose levelsRed blood cellsIPSS-RTransfusion burdenOpen-labelFirst doseRevised International Prognostic Scoring SystemHistory of acute myeloid leukemiaMDS mouse modelsMedian duration of responsePhase 2bInternational Prognostic Scoring SystemOpen-label multicenter studyAssociated with increased morbidityBone marrow neoplasmsHigh transfusion burdenIPSS-R scoreLow transfusion burdenDose level 1Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Myelodysplastic Syndromes/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: A Real-World Experience From a Developing Country
Awidi A, Alzu'bi M, Odeh N, Alrawabdeh J, Al Zyoud M, Hamadneh Y, Bawa'neh H, Magableh A, Alshorman A, Al-Fararjeh F, Aladily T, Zeidan A. Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Myelodysplastic Syndromes/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: A Real-World Experience From a Developing Country. JCO Global Oncology 2024, 10: e2300281. PMID: 38422464, PMCID: PMC10914245, DOI: 10.1200/go.23.00281.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMyelodysplastic syndromeAML transformationMDS/myeloproliferative neoplasmRevised International Prognostic Scoring SystemClonal bone marrow disordersRisk of AML transformationInternational Prognostic Scoring SystemBaseline serum ferritin levelsMultivariate Cox regression modelMale to female ratioMyelodysplastic syndromes/myeloproliferative neoplasmsPrimary myelodysplastic syndromesPrognostic Scoring SystemSerum ferritin levelsMyelodysplastic syndrome subtypesBaseline serum ferritinBone marrow disordersLactate dehydrogenase levelsCox regression modelsJordan University HospitalRetrospective registry dataRisk of deathPeripheral cytopeniasBaseline ferritinIneffective hematopoiesis
2015
Comparing the prognostic value of risk stratifying models for patients with lower‐risk myelodysplastic syndromes: Is one model better?
Zeidan AM, Sekeres MA, Wang X, Al Ali N, Garcia‐Manero G, Steensma DP, Roboz G, Barnard J, Padron E, DeZern A, Maciejewski JP, List AF, Komrokji RS, Consortium O. Comparing the prognostic value of risk stratifying models for patients with lower‐risk myelodysplastic syndromes: Is one model better? American Journal Of Hematology 2015, 90: 1036-1040. PMID: 26284571, DOI: 10.1002/ajh.24173.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsInternational Prognostic Scoring SystemIPSS-R categoryLR-MDSHarrell's C-indexOverall survivalC-indexLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesRevised International Prognostic Scoring SystemActual overall survivalMedian overall survivalVaried survival outcomesKaplan-Meier methodPrognostic scoring systemDisease-modifying therapiesCategory 3Eligible patientsPoor OSPrognostic utilitySurvival outcomesMyelodysplastic syndromePrognostic valueLarge cohortPatientsEarly interventionScoring systemComparing the Prognostic Value of Risk stratifying Models for Patients with Lower‐Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Is one model better?
Zeidan A, Sekeres M, Wang X, Al Ali N, Garcia‐Manero G, Steensma D, Roboz G, Barnard J, Padron E, Dezern A, Maciejewski J, List A, Komrokji R. Comparing the Prognostic Value of Risk stratifying Models for Patients with Lower‐Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Is one model better? American Journal Of Hematology 2015 PMCID: PMC4751065, DOI: 10.1002/ajh.24170.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchInternational Prognostic Scoring SystemIPSS-R categoryLR-MDSHarrell's C-indexOverall survivalC-indexLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesRevised International Prognostic Scoring SystemActual overall survivalMedian overall survivalVaried survival outcomesKaplan-Meier methodPrognostic scoring systemDisease-modifying therapiesCategory 3Eligible patientsPoor OSPrognostic utilitySurvival outcomesMyelodysplastic syndromePrognostic valueLarge cohortPatientsEarly interventionScoring system
2014
The Prognostic Utility of the Current Risk Models in Predicting Outcomes of Patients (pts) with Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (HR-MDS) Treated with Hypomethylating Agents (HMA)
Zeidan A, Sekeres M, Garcia-Manero G, Barnard J, Al Ali N, Zimmerman C, Roboz G, Steensma D, DeZern A, Jabbour E, Kantarjian H, Zell K, Wang Q, Gore S, Nazha A, Maciejewski J, List A, Komrokji R. The Prognostic Utility of the Current Risk Models in Predicting Outcomes of Patients (pts) with Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (HR-MDS) Treated with Hypomethylating Agents (HMA). Blood 2014, 124: 1935. DOI: 10.1182/blood.v124.21.1935.1935.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMD Anderson Prognostic Scoring SystemHigh-risk myelodysplastic syndromeInternational Prognostic Scoring SystemMedian overall survivalHematopoietic cell transplantationPrognostic scoring systemOverall response rateOverall survivalHMA therapyHypomethylating agentComplete responseScoring systemStable diseaseHematologic improvementPartial responseProgressive diseaseConfidence intervalsInternational Working Group 2006 criteriaMDS Clinical Research ConsortiumPrognostic modelRevised International Prognostic Scoring SystemRisk categoriesBoehringer Ingelheim CorpCycles of therapyMarrow complete response