2024
Sustained benefits of imetelstat on patient-reported fatigue in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes ineligible for, or relapsed/refractory to, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and high transfusion burden in the phase 3 IMerge study
Sekeres M, Santini V, Díez-Campelo M, Komrokji R, Fenaux P, Savona M, Madanat Y, Valcárcel-Ferreiras D, Oliva E, Regnault A, Creel K, Sengupta N, Dougherty S, Shah S, Sun L, Wan Y, Navada S, Zeidan A, Platzbecker U. Sustained benefits of imetelstat on patient-reported fatigue in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes ineligible for, or relapsed/refractory to, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and high transfusion burden in the phase 3 IMerge study. Leukemia & Lymphoma 2024, ahead-of-print: 1-6. PMID: 39535901, DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2024.2426057.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesPatient-reported fatigueHigh transfusion burdenErythropoiesis-stimulating agentsTransfusion burdenMyelodysplastic syndromeLong-Term Response Analysis of Transfusion Independence in Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agent-Naive Patients with Very Low-, Low-, or Intermediate-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes Treated with Luspatercept Vs Epoetin Alfa in the COMMANDS Trial
Garcia-Manero G, Santini V, Zeidan A, Komrokji R, Pozharskaya V, Keeperman K, Lai Y, Aggarwal B, Miteva D, Ferreiras D, Fenaux P, Shortt J, Della Porta M, Platzbecker U. Long-Term Response Analysis of Transfusion Independence in Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agent-Naive Patients with Very Low-, Low-, or Intermediate-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes Treated with Luspatercept Vs Epoetin Alfa in the COMMANDS Trial. Blood 2024, 144: 350. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2024-194240.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchHigh-risk myelodysplastic syndromeAcute myeloid leukemiaLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesRBC-TIDuration of responseMyelodysplastic syndromeRed blood cellsEpoetin alfaClinical benefitSerum erythropoietinIntermediate-risk myelodysplastic syndromesExposure-adjusted incidence ratesRed blood cell transfusionCumulative durationWithdrawal of consentClinically relevant subgroupsLong-term clinical valueVery low-Transfusion independenceData cutoffEligible ptsMyeloid leukemiaClinical efficacyTreatment armsLuspaterceptChanges in Red Blood Cell Transfusion Burden with Luspatercept Versus Epoetin Alfa in Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes in the Phase 3, Open-Label, Randomized, Controlled COMMANDS Trial
Garcia-Manero G, Della Porta M, Santini V, Zeidan A, Komrokji R, Fenaux P, Valcárcel D, Shortt J, Glassberg M, Yucel A, Lai Y, Miteva D, Rose S, Hnoosh A, Platzbecker U. Changes in Red Blood Cell Transfusion Burden with Luspatercept Versus Epoetin Alfa in Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes in the Phase 3, Open-Label, Randomized, Controlled COMMANDS Trial. Blood 2024, 144: 1832-1832. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2024-198304.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchRegular red blood cell transfusionsLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesErythropoiesis-stimulating agentsTreated with epoetin alfaEpoetin alfaRBC unitsLuspatercept treatmentTransfusion burdenMyelodysplastic syndromeOpen-labelFirst-in-class erythroid maturation agentRed blood cell transfusion burdenEfficacy of erythropoiesis-stimulating agentsRed blood cell transfusionErythroid maturation agentBlood cell transfusionBaseline Hb levelsArm of treatmentRBC-TICell transfusionMedian ageResponse durabilityChronic anemiaHb levelsLuspaterceptHealth-Related Quality of Life of Luspatercept Versus Epoetin Alfa in Red Blood Cell Transfusion-Dependent Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Results from the Final Datacut of the Phase 3 COMMANDS Study
Oliva E, Platzbecker U, Della Porta M, Garcia-Manero G, Santini V, Fenaux P, Shortt J, Komrokji R, Pelligra C, Guo S, Yucel A, Glassberg M, Eliason L, Hnoosh A, Miteva D, Rose S, Kreitz S, Sekeres M, Zeidan A. Health-Related Quality of Life of Luspatercept Versus Epoetin Alfa in Red Blood Cell Transfusion-Dependent Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Results from the Final Datacut of the Phase 3 COMMANDS Study. Blood 2024, 144: 3216. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2024-198374.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesReduction of red blood cellsFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-AnemiaClinically important differenceEpoetin alfaMyelodysplastic syndromeRevised International Prognostic Scoring SystemInternational Prognostic Scoring SystemHealth-related qualityClinically important difference thresholdImprovement of cytopeniasMean haemoglobin increaseRBC transfusion independencePrognostic Scoring SystemPhase 3 studyStratified Cox proportional hazard regressionsFront-line treatmentOnset of improvementQLQ-C30Cox proportional hazards regressionEORTC QLQ-C30Treatment of anemiaProportional hazards regressionSuperior treatment effectsPost-baseline assessmentCorrelation of Patient-Reported Outcomes with Red Blood Cell Transfusion Reduction and Rise in Hemoglobin in Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes in the IMerge Trial
Sekeres M, Santini V, Zeidan A, Platzbecker U, Komrokji R, Diez-Campelo M, Fenaux P, Savona M, Madanat Y, Valcarcel D, Regnault A, Creel K, Sengupta N, Dougherty S, Shah S, Sun L, Wan Y, Navada S, Oliva E. Correlation of Patient-Reported Outcomes with Red Blood Cell Transfusion Reduction and Rise in Hemoglobin in Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes in the IMerge Trial. Blood 2024, 144: 3210. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2024-199636.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesErythropoiesis-stimulating agentsPatient-reported outcomesFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-AnemiaRed blood cellsAnemia symptomsQuality of lifeRBC-TDRBC-TITransfusion burdenPlacebo recipientsTransfusion independenceMyelodysplastic syndromeTransfusion reductionRed blood cell transfusion independenceFunctional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-FatigueBaseline to cycleUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationStates Food and Drug AdministrationCorrelations of patient-reported outcomesFirst-in-classFunctional assessmentFood and Drug AdministrationMaintenance of quality of lifePost hoc analysisInitial Results from the QTc Substudy of the IMerge Phase 3 Trial Demonstrate Clinically Meaningful Efficacy, Manageable Safety, and Absence of Proarrhythmic Risk in Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes Who Received Prior Therapies Beyond Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents
Komrokji R, Santini V, Platzbecker U, Van Eygen K, Diez-Campelo M, De Paz R, Sanz G, Thépot S, Kaźmierczak M, Oliva E, Sekeres M, Fenaux P, Madanat Y, Savona M, Riggs J, Dougherty S, Lennox A, Xia Q, Sun L, Berry T, Zeidan A. Initial Results from the QTc Substudy of the IMerge Phase 3 Trial Demonstrate Clinically Meaningful Efficacy, Manageable Safety, and Absence of Proarrhythmic Risk in Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes Who Received Prior Therapies Beyond Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents. Blood 2024, 144: 4590-4590. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2024-200885.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesErythropoiesis-stimulating agentsHematological improvement-erythroidFood and Drug AdministrationRBC-TIPhase 3 trialPlacebo recipientsHypomethylating agentsInternational Working GroupData cutoffMyelodysplastic syndromeTransfusion reductionRed blood cellsProarrhythmic riskProgression to acute myeloid leukemiaErythropoiesis-stimulating agent useConcentration-QT relationshipEffects of imetelstatRBC transfusion independenceGrade 3/4 neutropeniaMedian treatment durationKaplan-Meier methodologyClinically meaningful efficacyUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationAcute myeloid leukemiaA Phase 2B, Open-Label Multicenter Study of Tebapivat (AG-946), a Potent Pyruvate Kinase Activator, in Patients with Anemia Due to Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Zeidan A, Sekeres M, Al-Samkari H, Carraway H, DeZern A, Mittelman M, Little M, Beynon V, Dai X, Sommakia S, Despotovic J, Patel P, Dibacco M, Fattizzo B, Stein E, Sallman D, Kulasekararaj A, Platzbecker U, Fenaux P. A Phase 2B, Open-Label Multicenter Study of Tebapivat (AG-946), a Potent Pyruvate Kinase Activator, in Patients with Anemia Due to Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes. Blood 2024, 144: 6708-6708. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2024-203073.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLower-risk MDSErythropoiesis-stimulating agentsLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesRed blood cell unitsMyelodysplastic syndromeProportion of patientsDose levelsRed blood cellsIPSS-RTransfusion burdenOpen-labelFirst doseRevised International Prognostic Scoring SystemHistory of acute myeloid leukemiaMDS mouse modelsMedian duration of responsePhase 2bInternational Prognostic Scoring SystemOpen-label multicenter studyAssociated with increased morbidityBone marrow neoplasmsHigh transfusion burdenIPSS-R scoreLow transfusion burdenDose level 1Effect of Prior Treatments on the Clinical Activity of Imetelstat in Transfusion-Dependent Patients with Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent, Relapsed or Refractory/Ineligible Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Platzbecker U, Santini V, Zeidan A, Sekeres M, Fenaux P, Raza A, Mittelman M, Thépot S, Buckstein R, Germing U, Madanat Y, Diez-Campelo M, Valcarcel D, Jonasova A, Dougherty S, Shah S, Xia Q, Sun L, Navada S, Savona M, Komrokji R. Effect of Prior Treatments on the Clinical Activity of Imetelstat in Transfusion-Dependent Patients with Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent, Relapsed or Refractory/Ineligible Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes. Blood 2024, 144: 352-352. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2024-203612.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesHematological improvement-erythroidErythropoiesis-stimulating agentsErythropoiesis-stimulating agent therapyHb riseRBC-TIHypomethylating agentsTransfusion reductionClinical activityMyelodysplastic syndromeQTc studyRed blood cellsPrior treatmentInternational Working GroupRBC transfusion independenceHypomethylating agent treatmentTransfusion-dependent patientsPhase 2/3 trialsLimited treatment optionsUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationStates Food and Drug AdministrationFirst-in-classFood and Drug AdministrationRBC-TDLenalidomide treatmentMDS-156 Efficacy of Imetelstat on Red Blood Cell (RBC)-Transfusion Independence (TI) in the Absence of Platelet Transfusions or Myeloid Growth Factors (MGF) in IMerge
Zeidan A, Santini V, Platzbecker U, Sekeres M, Savona M, Fenaux P, Madanat Y, Raza A, Xia Q, Sun L, Riggs J, Shah S, Navada S, Berry T, Komrokji R. MDS-156 Efficacy of Imetelstat on Red Blood Cell (RBC)-Transfusion Independence (TI) in the Absence of Platelet Transfusions or Myeloid Growth Factors (MGF) in IMerge. Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia 2024, 24: s386. DOI: 10.1016/s2152-2650(24)01344-2.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesMyeloid growth factorsErythropoiesis-stimulating agentsRBC-TIPlatelet transfusionsTransfusion-dependentHb levelsLong-term respondersPercentage of patientsHb riseRBC-TDPlacebo patientsNon-del(5qMyelodysplastic syndromePlacebo groupPrimary endpointSecondary endpointsInvestigator's discretionClinical benefitPlaceboAnalysis cutoffImetelstatDisease progressionTransfusionSupportive careMDS-157 Overall Survival (OS), Clinical Benefit, and Durable Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Independence (TI) With Imetelstat in the IMerge Phase 3 Trial of RBC-Transfusion Dependent (TD) Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS)
Santini V, Komrokji R, Sekeres M, Savona M, Fenaux P, Madanat Y, Oliva E, Buckstein R, Annaášová A, Germing U, Mittelman M, Thepot S, Riggs J, Dougherty S, Berry T, Navada S, Xia Q, Sun L, Zeidan A, Platzbecker U. MDS-157 Overall Survival (OS), Clinical Benefit, and Durable Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Independence (TI) With Imetelstat in the IMerge Phase 3 Trial of RBC-Transfusion Dependent (TD) Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS). Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia 2024, 24: s386-s387. DOI: 10.1016/s2152-2650(24)01345-4.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesNon-del(5q) lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesErythropoiesis-stimulating agentsRBC-TIOverall survivalRBC-TDNon-del(5qClinical benefitRed blood cellsHemoglobin increaseRBC transfusion dependenceStratified log-rank testMedian follow-upKaplan-Meier methodLog-rank testWithdrawal of consentMedian OSOS ratesHemoglobin riseMyelodysplastic syndromeOS analysisHemoglobin levelsAssess OSPlaceboImetelstatOverall Survival (OS), Clinical Benefit, and Durable Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Independence (TI) With Imetelstat in the IMerge Phase 3 Trial of RBC-Transfusion Dependent (TD) Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS)
Santini V, Komrokji R, Sekeres M, Savona M, Fenaux P, Madanat Y, Oliva E, Buckstein R, Jonášová A, Germing U, Mittelman M, Thepot S, Riggs J, Dougherty S, Berry T, Navada S, Xia Q, Sun L, Zeidan A, Platzbecker U. Overall Survival (OS), Clinical Benefit, and Durable Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Independence (TI) With Imetelstat in the IMerge Phase 3 Trial of RBC-Transfusion Dependent (TD) Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS). Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia 2024, 24: s192. DOI: 10.1016/s2152-2650(24)00647-5.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesOverall survivalRed blood cellsRBC transfusion dependenceMyelodysplastic syndromeClinical benefitBlood cellsOverall Survival (OS), Clinical Benefit, and Durable Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Independence (TI) With Imetelstat in the IMerge Phase 3 Trial of RBC-Transfusion Dependent (TD) Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS)
Santini V, Komrokji R, Sekeres M, Savona M, Fenaux P, Madanat Y, Oliva E, Buckstein R, Jonášová A, Germing U, Mittelman M, Thepot S, Riggs J, Dougherty S, Berry T, Navada S, Xia Q, Sun L, Zeidan A, Platzbecker U. Overall Survival (OS), Clinical Benefit, and Durable Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Independence (TI) With Imetelstat in the IMerge Phase 3 Trial of RBC-Transfusion Dependent (TD) Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS). Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia 2024, 24: s153. DOI: 10.1016/s2152-2650(24)00388-4.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesOverall survivalRed blood cellsRBC transfusion dependenceMyelodysplastic syndromeClinical benefitBlood cellsLuspatercept versus epoetin alfa in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent-naive, transfusion-dependent, lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (COMMANDS): primary analysis of a phase 3, open-label, randomised, controlled trial
Della Porta M, Garcia-Manero G, Santini V, Zeidan A, Komrokji R, Shortt J, Valcárcel D, Jonasova A, Dimicoli-Salazar S, Tiong I, Lin C, Li J, Zhang J, Pilot R, Kreitz S, Pozharskaya V, Keeperman K, Rose S, Prebet T, Lai Y, Degulys A, Paolini S, Cluzeau T, Fenaux P, Platzbecker U. Luspatercept versus epoetin alfa in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent-naive, transfusion-dependent, lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (COMMANDS): primary analysis of a phase 3, open-label, randomised, controlled trial. The Lancet Haematology 2024, 11: e646-e658. PMID: 39038479, DOI: 10.1016/s2352-3026(24)00203-5.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesRed blood cell transfusion independenceTreatment-emergent adverse eventsMedian follow-upEpoetin alfa groupMyelodysplastic syndromeLuspatercept groupTransfusion-dependentSerum erythropoietin concentrationPrimary endpointEpoetin alfaTransfusion independenceOpen-labelAlfa groupAdverse eventsFollow-upRed blood cell transfusion burdenErythropoietin concentrationIntention-to-treat populationControlled trialsCommon grade 3Epoetin alfa recipientsMean haemoglobin increasePrimary analysisProportion of patientsPrognostic impact of ‘multi-hit’ versus ‘single-hit’ TP53 alteration in patients with acute myeloid leukemia: results from the Consortium on Myeloid Malignancies and Neoplastic Diseases
Badar T, Nanaa A, Atallah E, Shallis R, Craver E, Li Z, Goldberg A, Saliba A, Patel A, Bewersdorf J, Duvall A, Burkart M, Bradshaw D, Abaza Y, Stahl M, Palmisiano N, Murthy S, Zeidan A, Kota V, Patnaik M, Litzow M. Prognostic impact of ‘multi-hit’ versus ‘single-hit’ TP53 alteration in patients with acute myeloid leukemia: results from the Consortium on Myeloid Malignancies and Neoplastic Diseases. Haematologica 2024, 109: 3533-3542. PMID: 38813716, PMCID: PMC11532685, DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2024.285000.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchAcute myeloid leukemiaMyelodysplastic syndromeComplex cytogeneticsMyeloid leukemiaAllogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantationLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesHematopoietic stem cell transplantationHigher-risk myelodysplastic syndromesOutcomes of SHStem cell transplantationAllo-HCTTP53 alterationsPrognostic impactMyeloid malignanciesTP53 mutationsCell transplantationFLT3-ITDIDH1 mutationMultivariate analysisSupportive careUS academic institutionsNeoplastic diseasePatientsSuperior EFSPredicting outcomeEfficacy of imetelstat on red blood cell (RBC)-transfusion independence (TI) in the absence of platelet transfusions or myeloid growth factors in IMerge.
Zeidan A, Santini V, Platzbecker U, Sekeres M, Savona M, Fenaux P, Madanat Y, Raza A, Xia Q, Sun L, Riggs J, Shah S, Navada S, Berry T, Komrokji R. Efficacy of imetelstat on red blood cell (RBC)-transfusion independence (TI) in the absence of platelet transfusions or myeloid growth factors in IMerge. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2024, 42: 6566-6566. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2024.42.16_suppl.6566.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesRBC-TIMyeloid growth factorsPlatelet transfusionsTransfusion-dependentHb levelsGrowth factorGrowth factor supportLong-term respondersGrowth factor useErythropoiesis stimulating agentsHb riseSevere neutropeniaMyelodysplastic syndromePlacebo groupPrimary endpointSecondary endpointsFactor supportInvestigator's discretionClinical benefitAdverse eventsPlaceboAnalysis cutoffImetelstatDisease progressionClinical benefit of luspatercept treatment (tx) in transfusion-dependent (TD), erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA)–naive patients (pts) with very low-, low- or intermediate-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) in the COMMANDS trial.
Zeidan A, Platzbecker U, Della Porta M, Santini V, Garcia-Manero G, Li J, Kreitz S, Pozharskaya V, Rose S, Lai Y, Valcárcel D, Fenaux P, Shortt J, Komrokji R. Clinical benefit of luspatercept treatment (tx) in transfusion-dependent (TD), erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA)–naive patients (pts) with very low-, low- or intermediate-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) in the COMMANDS trial. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2024, 42: 6565-6565. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2024.42.16_suppl.6565.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchRed blood cell unitsLower-risk MDSRBC-TITransfusion burdenRed blood cellsTransfusion-dependentMyelodysplastic syndromeClinical benefitRed blood cell transfusion independenceAssessment of clinical benefitIntermediate-risk myelodysplastic syndromesLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesBone marrow blastsClinically meaningful responseYears of ageLuspatercept treatmentMarrow blastsTransfusion independenceMean HbRinged sideroblastsEligible ptsMean hemoglobinHb levelsCumulative medianLuspaterceptCLO24-079: Results From Phase 3 Trial of Imetelstat, a First-in-Class Telomerase Inhibitor, in Patients With Red Blood Cell Transfusion Dependent (RBC-TD) Non-del(5q) Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS) Relapsed/Refractory to/Ineligible for Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents (ESAs)
Madanat Y, Savona M, Sekeres M, Platzbecker U, Santini V, Fenaux P, Diez-Campelo M, Valcárcel D, Berry T, Dougherty S, Shah S, Sun L, Wan Y, Huang F, Navada S, Komrokji R, Zeidan A. CLO24-079: Results From Phase 3 Trial of Imetelstat, a First-in-Class Telomerase Inhibitor, in Patients With Red Blood Cell Transfusion Dependent (RBC-TD) Non-del(5q) Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS) Relapsed/Refractory to/Ineligible for Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents (ESAs). Journal Of The National Comprehensive Cancer Network 2024, 22 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.7228.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchEFFICACY AND SAFETY OF LUSPATERCEPT VERSUS EPOETIN ALFA IN ERYTHROPOIESIS-STIMULATING AGENT (ESA)-NAIVE PATIENTS WITH TRANSFUSION-DEPENDENT LOWER-RISK MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES (LR-MDS): FULL ANALYSIS OF THE COMMANDS TRIAL
Garcia-Manero G, Platzbecker U, Santini V, Zeidan A, Fenaux P, Komrokji R, Shortt J, Valcarcel D, Jonasova A, Dimicoli-Salazar S, Tiong I, Lin C, Li J, Zhang J, Giuseppi A, Kreitz S, Pozharskaya V, Keeperman K, Rose S, Prebet T, Degulys A, Paolini S, Cluzeau T, Della Porta M. EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF LUSPATERCEPT VERSUS EPOETIN ALFA IN ERYTHROPOIESIS-STIMULATING AGENT (ESA)-NAIVE PATIENTS WITH TRANSFUSION-DEPENDENT LOWER-RISK MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES (LR-MDS): FULL ANALYSIS OF THE COMMANDS TRIAL. Leukemia Research Reports 2024, 21: 100447. DOI: 10.1016/j.lrr.2024.100447.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesTreatment-emergent adverse eventsEA-treated patientsRBC-TIPrimary endpointHI-ERed blood cell transfusion independenceHematological improvement-erythroidTransfusion independenceErythroid responseMyelodysplastic syndromeSecondary endpointsAdverse eventsFull analysisLuspaterceptAssessed efficacySafety resultsEpoetin alfaTreatment durationPatientsEndpointEfficacyDurationPost-treatmentAML
2023
Imetelstat in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes who have relapsed or are refractory to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (IMerge): a multinational, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial
Platzbecker U, Santini V, Fenaux P, Sekeres M, Savona M, Madanat Y, Díez-Campelo M, Valcárcel D, Illmer T, Jonášová A, Bělohlávková P, Sherman L, Berry T, Dougherty S, Shah S, Xia Q, Sun L, Wan Y, Huang F, Ikin A, Navada S, Feller F, Komrokji R, Zeidan A. Imetelstat in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes who have relapsed or are refractory to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (IMerge): a multinational, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. The Lancet 2023, 403: 249-260. PMID: 38048786, DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)01724-5.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesErythropoiesis-stimulating agentsPlacebo groupAdverse eventsMyelodysplastic syndromeGrade 3Subsequent anti-cancer therapyTreatment-emergent adverse eventsTreatment-emergent grade 3Days of randomisationIPSS risk groupRBC transfusion burdenTransfusion independence rateTreatment-related deathsUnacceptable toxic effectsPlacebo-controlled trialDisease-modifying activityPhase 2 trialPhase 3 trialPrimary efficacy analysisProportion of patientsWithdrawal of consentUnmet medical needComputer-generated scheduleAnti-cancer therapyThe ELEMENT-MDS Trial: A Phase 3 Randomized Study Evaluating Luspatercept Versus Epoetin Alfa in Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent-Naive, Non-Transfusion-Dependent, Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Zeidan A, Komrokji R, Buckstein R, Santini V, Rose S, Malini P, Lew G, Aggarwal D, Keeperman K, Jiang H, Giuseppi A, Zhang J, Cluzeau T, Shortt J, Platzbecker U. The ELEMENT-MDS Trial: A Phase 3 Randomized Study Evaluating Luspatercept Versus Epoetin Alfa in Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent-Naive, Non-Transfusion-Dependent, Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes. Blood 2023, 142: 6503. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2023-178635.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchRBC transfusion dependenceErythropoiesis-stimulating agentsLR-MDSEpoetin alfaMyelodysplastic syndromeTransfusion dependenceSecondary endpointsStarting doseOverall survivalTransfusion independenceWeek 1Baseline serum erythropoietin levelsIntermediate-risk myelodysplastic syndromesIPSS-R risk categoryLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesRed blood cell transfusionHigh-risk myelodysplastic syndromeInternational Prognostic Scoring SystemAdditional secondary endpointsRBC transfusion independenceTransfusion-free survivalKey secondary endpointBlood cell transfusionPatient Global ImpressionPhase 3 study