2024
Diagnostic utility of prostate health index density prior to MRI-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy
Press B, Lokeshwar S, Webb L, Khajir G, Smani S, Olawoyin O, Gardezi M, Rahman S, Leapman M, Sprenkle P. Diagnostic utility of prostate health index density prior to MRI-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy. Exploration Of Targeted Anti-tumor Therapy 2024, 5: 1168-1176. PMID: 39465014, PMCID: PMC11502073, DOI: 10.37349/etat.2024.00269.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchProstate Health IndexMRI-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsyClinically significant prostate cancerFusion targeted biopsyPI-RADS 1Gleason grade groupMagnetic resonance imagingPhi densityPI-RADSProstate specific-antigenProstate biopsyImproved detection of clinically significant prostate cancerDetection of clinically significant prostate cancerPHI testingProstate health index densityElevated prostate-specific antigenMRI-ultrasound fusionProstate Imaging ReportingSignificant prostate cancerProstate-specific antigenSelection of patientsDetection of PCaReceiver operating characteristic curveCombination of magnetic resonance imagingMultivariate logistic regressionAssociation Between the Decipher Genomic Classifier and Prostate Cancer Outcome in the Real-world Setting
Leapman M, Ho J, Liu Y, Filson C, Zhao X, Hakansson A, Proudfoot J, Davicioni E, Martin D, An Y, Seibert T, Lin D, Spratt D, Cooperberg M, Sprenkle P, Ross A. Association Between the Decipher Genomic Classifier and Prostate Cancer Outcome in the Real-world Setting. European Urology Oncology 2024 PMID: 39098389, DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.07.010.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchDecipher genomic classifierRisk of metastasisBiochemical recurrenceRadical prostatectomyGenomic classifierDecipher testProstate cancerProstate Risk Assessment Postsurgical ScoreRisk of biochemical recurrencePatient's prostate cancerRisk of cancer recurrencePathological risk factorsProstate cancer outcomesCox proportional hazards regressionRetrospective cohort studyElectronic health record dataReal-world settingsProportional hazards regressionHealth record dataReal-world practice settingsProstate biopsyRP specimensOncological outcomesPrognostic significanceMedian ageRisk factors for Gleason score upgrade from prostate biopsy to radical prostatectomy
Smani S, Sundaresan V, Lokeshwar S, Choksi A, Carbonella J, Brito J, Renzulli J, Sprenkle P, Leapman M. Risk factors for Gleason score upgrade from prostate biopsy to radical prostatectomy. Exploration Of Targeted Anti-tumor Therapy 2024, 5: 981-996. PMID: 39280242, PMCID: PMC11390291, DOI: 10.37349/etat.2024.00259.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchGleason score upgradingProstate-specific antigenRisk factorsMagnetic resonance imagingRadical prostatectomyScore upgradingAssociated with Gleason score upgradingBiopsy to radical prostatectomyHigher-risk prostate cancerPatients treated with surgeryProstate magnetic resonance imagingClinically localized diseaseGleason grade groupLow-risk diseaseRecognition of risk factorsBody mass indexGleason upgradingFinal pathologyProstate volumeProstate biopsySource of diagnostic uncertaintyBiopsy coresLocalized diseaseProstate cancerInitial managementRisk Factors and Contemporary Management Options for Pain and Discomfort Experienced During a Prostate Biopsy
Diaz G, Webb L, Rabil M, Lokeshwar S, Choksi A, Leapman M, Sprenkle P. Risk Factors and Contemporary Management Options for Pain and Discomfort Experienced During a Prostate Biopsy. Current Urology Reports 2024, 25: 243-252. PMID: 38896314, DOI: 10.1007/s11934-024-01220-w.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchProstate biopsyRisk factorsEffective pain management strategiesDiagnosed prostate cancerPain management strategiesIn-office proceduresModern management optionsNonadherence to treatmentContemporary management optionsEnhance patient comfortInnovative imaging modalitiesExperience of painFusion biopsyProstate volumePain intensityProstate cancerPain varyPatient ageIncreased painFollow-upIn-officeManagement optionsSurveillance adherenceBiopsyPharmacological analgesicsRISKS OF GRADE RECLASSIFICATION AMONG PATIENTS WITH GLEASON GRADE GROUP 1 PROSTATE CANCER AND PI-RADS 5 FINDINGS ON PROSTATE MRI
Sundaresan V, Webb L, Rabil M, Golos A, Sutherland R, Sprenkle P, Kim I, Leapman M. RISKS OF GRADE RECLASSIFICATION AMONG PATIENTS WITH GLEASON GRADE GROUP 1 PROSTATE CANCER AND PI-RADS 5 FINDINGS ON PROSTATE MRI. Urologic Oncology Seminars And Original Investigations 2024, 42: s79. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.01.222.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchGleason Grade Group 1PI-RADS 5 lesionsPI-RADSProstate biopsyProstate cancerGleason upgradingRadical prostatectomyActive surveillanceProstate MRIMultivariate logistic regressionGrade Group 1 prostate cancerConversion to active treatmentOptimal management of patientsGrade group 1PI-RADS 5Gleason grade groupProstate Imaging ReportingDied of diseaseManagement of patientsLogistic regressionPrimary study outcomeAssociated with oddsMedian PSAMetastatic diseaseGrade disease
2023
Prostate cancer risk stratification using magnetic resonance imaging–ultrasound fusion vs systematic prostate biopsy
Khajir G, Press B, Lokeshwar S, Ghabili K, Rahman S, Gardezi M, Washington S, Cooperberg M, Sprenkle P, Leapman M. Prostate cancer risk stratification using magnetic resonance imaging–ultrasound fusion vs systematic prostate biopsy. JNCI Cancer Spectrum 2023, 7: pkad099. PMID: 38085220, PMCID: PMC10733209, DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkad099.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMagnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusionMRF-TBLow-risk diseaseSystematic biopsyLower riskRisk groupingProstate biopsyActive surveillanceHigh riskProstate cancer risk stratificationIntermediate-risk criteriaIntermediate-risk diseaseSystematic prostate biopsyCancer risk stratificationPrimary study objectiveNCCN guidelinesImage-guided approachLocalized cancerRisk stratificationBenign findingsProstate cancerClinical riskDiagnostic yieldRetrospective analysisBiopsy
2022
Prediction of Adverse Pathology at Radical Prostatectomy in Grade Group 2 and 3 Prostate Biopsies Using Machine Learning.
Paulson N, Zeevi T, Papademetris M, Leapman MS, Onofrey JA, Sprenkle PC, Humphrey PA, Staib LH, Levi AW. Prediction of Adverse Pathology at Radical Prostatectomy in Grade Group 2 and 3 Prostate Biopsies Using Machine Learning. JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics 2022, 6: e2200016. PMID: 36179281, DOI: 10.1200/cci.22.00016.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsGrade group 2Prostate biopsyRadical prostatectomyAdverse outcomesGroup 2GG-2Core prostate biopsyProstate cancer outcomesPatient's clinical riskClinical risk assessmentCore needle biopsyOngoing clinical needAdverse outcome predictionRetrospective reviewAdverse pathologyCAPRA scoreEntire cohortCancer outcomesPathologic diagnosisNeedle biopsyClinical riskDisease outcomeProstate cancerBiopsyDisease oneClinical utility of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy in patients with lower suspicion lesions on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer
Lokeshwar SD, Nguyen J, Rahman SN, Khajir G, Ho R, Ghabili K, Leapman MS, Weinreb JC, Sprenkle PC. Clinical utility of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy in patients with lower suspicion lesions on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer. Urologic Oncology Seminars And Original Investigations 2022, 40: 407.e21-407.e27. PMID: 35811206, DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.06.005.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsActive surveillanceIndex lesionProstate biopsyProstate cancerMultiparametric magnetic resonance imagingData System version 2Low-risk CaPSurveillance prostate biopsyGleason grade groupMultivariate logistic regressionSignificant prostate cancerProstate Imaging ReportingReceiver operator characteristic curvePI-RADS 2Low-suspicion lesionsOperator characteristic curveMagnetic resonance imagingHigher PSADOnly significant variablePrimary outcomeMultivariable analysisSystematic biopsyRetrospective analysisBiopsy approachImaging Reporting
2018
MP01-20 THE LEARNING CURVE FOR MULTI-PARAMETRIC MRI/US FUSION GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSY: A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE
Leung C, Syed J, Pan S, Neville T, Sprenkle P. MP01-20 THE LEARNING CURVE FOR MULTI-PARAMETRIC MRI/US FUSION GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSY: A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE. Journal Of Urology 2018, 199: e11. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.02.126.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2016
MRI-US fusion targeted biopsy results in patients without history of prostate biopsy.
Nawaf C, Rosoff J, Weinreb J, Lu A, Levi A, Humphrey P, Schulam P, Sprenkle P. MRI-US fusion targeted biopsy results in patients without history of prostate biopsy. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2016, 34: 150-150. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.34.2_suppl.150.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchBiopsy-naive menMRI-US fusionGleason scoreProstate cancerMapping biopsyProstate biopsyCS prostate cancerPre-biopsy mpMRITemplate mapping biopsyLow-grade diseaseCancer detection rateMRI-ultrasound fusionBiopsy of lesionsMaximum Gleason scoreCS cancerPrevious biopsyPrior biopsyBiopsy resultsFusion biopsyInclusion criteriaMp-MRIPatient basisPatientsBiopsyCancerMRI-US fusion targeted biopsy results in men with a history of prior cancer.
Nawaf C, Rosoff J, Lu A, Weinreb J, Humphrey P, Levi A, Schulam P, Sprenkle P. MRI-US fusion targeted biopsy results in men with a history of prior cancer. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2016, 34: 88-88. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.34.2_suppl.88.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMRI-US fusionGleason scoreActive surveillanceFusion biopsySignificant cancerProstate cancerGleason 6 prostate cancerPre-biopsy mpMRIPrevious prostate biopsyAppropriate risk stratificationMRI-ultrasound fusionBiopsy of lesionsMaximum Gleason scoreUpstaging rateC cancerPrior cancerPrior biopsyMapping biopsyRisk stratificationHigher PSABiopsy resultsProstate biopsyInclusion criteriaMp-MRIPatient basisMRI-US fusion targeted biopsy results in patients with a history of a prior negative biopsy.
Nawaf C, Lu A, Rosoff J, Weinreb J, Schulam P, Humphrey P, Levi A, Sprenkle P. MRI-US fusion targeted biopsy results in patients with a history of a prior negative biopsy. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2016, 34: 90-90. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.34.2_suppl.90.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPrior negative biopsyCS cancerGleason scoreNegative MRIProstate cancerNegative biopsyCS prostate cancerMRI suspicion scoreMRI-US fusionPre-biopsy mpMRIFusion prostate biopsyMRI-ultrasound fusionSignificant prostate cancerCancer detection rateBiopsy of lesionsMaximum Gleason scoreMulti-parametric MRIElevated PSAPrevious biopsyRepeat biopsyMapping biopsyBiopsy resultsProstate biopsyFusion biopsyStandard biopsy
2015
MP17-08 MRI-FUSION PROSTATE BIOPSY IN FIRST-TIME BIOPSY COHORT YIELDS INCREASED DETECTION OF CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER USING A SIMPLIFIED MRI GRADING SCALE
Kardos S, Pan S, Nawaf C, Fan R, Cornfeld D, Weinreb J, Schulam P, Sprenkle P. MP17-08 MRI-FUSION PROSTATE BIOPSY IN FIRST-TIME BIOPSY COHORT YIELDS INCREASED DETECTION OF CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER USING A SIMPLIFIED MRI GRADING SCALE. Journal Of Urology 2015, 193: e179. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.850.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchSimplified prostate lesion grading for magnetic resonance imaging and improved cancer detection at fusion-targeted prostate biopsy.
Kardos S, Nawaf C, Fan R, Cornfeld D, Weinreb J, Schulam P, Sprenkle P. Simplified prostate lesion grading for magnetic resonance imaging and improved cancer detection at fusion-targeted prostate biopsy. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2015, 33: 69-69. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.33.7_suppl.69.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchCancer detection rateOverall cancer detection rateSignificant prostate cancerProstate cancerSystematic biopsyProstate biopsyFusion biopsyCommon solid organ malignancyEndorectal coilCores TRUS biopsyPrior negative biopsySolid organ malignanciesFusion prostate biopsyCochran-Armitage trend testCause of cancerMagnetic resonance imagingReal-time ultrasoundArmitage trend testAbnormal DRELesion stratificationElevated PSAOrgan malignanciesLesion gradingNegative biopsyTRUS biopsy