2021
Imaging Features at the Periphery: Hemodynamics, Pathophysiology, and Effect on LI-RADS Categorization.
Consul N, Sirlin CB, Chernyak V, Fetzer DT, Masch WR, Arora SS, Do RKG, Marks RM, Fowler KJ, Borhani AA, Elsayes KM. Imaging Features at the Periphery: Hemodynamics, Pathophysiology, and Effect on LI-RADS Categorization. RadioGraphics 2021, 41: 1657-1675. PMID: 34559586, DOI: 10.1148/rg.2021210019.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsCarcinoma, HepatocellularContrast MediaHemodynamicsHumansLiver NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityConceptsHepatocellular carcinomaEnhancement patternLiver observationsCapsule appearanceRim arterial phase hyperenhancementAncillary featuresNon-HCC malignanciesLocal-regional therapyArterial phase hyperenhancementLiver Imaging ReportingDynamic contrast-enhanced imagingDifferent enhancement patternsImaging-based diagnosisContrast-enhanced imagingPeripheral washoutArterioportal shuntTargetoid appearanceNodular enhancementCorona enhancementBenign entityTreatment responseLI-RADSRisk populationsLiver lesionsSpecific diagnosisRole of the radiologist at HCC multidisciplinary conference and use of the LR-TR algorithm for improving workflow
Shenoy-Bhangle AS, Tsai LL, Masciocchi M, Arora SS, Kielar AZ. Role of the radiologist at HCC multidisciplinary conference and use of the LR-TR algorithm for improving workflow. Abdominal Radiology 2021, 46: 3558-3564. PMID: 33904990, DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03094-9.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAlgorithmsCarcinoma, HepatocellularContrast MediaHumansLiver NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingRadiologistsRetrospective StudiesWorkflowConceptsLiver-directed locoregional therapiesLR-TR algorithmHepatocellular carcinomaLocoregional therapyMultidisciplinary conferenceLiver observationsTreatment of HCCLiver-directed therapiesLiver Imaging ReportingOptimal patient managementPost-treatment imagingRadiologic findingsLiver diseaseOncology patientsTransplant eligibilityInterdisciplinary managementHCC screeningPatient managementMultidisciplinary discussionPatient careImaging ReportingPatientsTherapyRadiologistsDiseaseDiagnostic renal mass biopsy is associated with individual categories of PADUA and RENAL nephrometry scores: Analysis of diagnostic and concordance rates with surgical resection
Fonseca RB, Straub Hogan MM, Kapp ME, Cate F, Coogan A, Arora S, Gordetsky J, Smelser WW, Clark PE, Cates J, Giannico GA. Diagnostic renal mass biopsy is associated with individual categories of PADUA and RENAL nephrometry scores: Analysis of diagnostic and concordance rates with surgical resection. Urologic Oncology Seminars And Original Investigations 2021, 39: 371.e7-371.e15. PMID: 33773915, PMCID: PMC8205938, DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.02.022.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedBiopsy, Fine-NeedleBiopsy, Large-Core NeedleFemaleHumansKidneyKidney NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesConceptsCore needle biopsySmall renal massesFine-needle aspirationRenal mass biopsyDiagnostic core needle biopsyDiagnostic fine needle aspirationRenal massesNon-diagnostic rateCystic massMass biopsyConcordance rateEndophytic growthRenal sinus invasionRENAL nephrometry scoreSurgical resection specimensSurgical resectionNephrometry scoreSinus invasionRetrospective studyPreoperative aspectsResection specimensSingle institutionClinical managementSubset analysisNeedle biopsy
2020
Variability of the Positive Predictive Value of PI-RADS for Prostate MRI across 26 Centers: Experience of the Society of Abdominal Radiology Prostate Cancer Disease-focused Panel
Westphalen AC, McCulloch CE, Anaokar JM, Arora S, Barashi NS, Barentsz JO, Bathala TK, Bittencourt LK, Booker MT, Braxton VG, Carroll PR, Casalino DD, Chang SD, Coakley FV, Dhatt R, Eberhardt SC, Foster BR, Froemming AT, Fütterer JJ, Ganeshan DM, Gertner MR, Mankowski Gettle L, Ghai S, Gupta RT, Hahn ME, Houshyar R, Kim C, Kim CK, Lall C, Margolis DJA, McRae SE, Oto A, Parsons RB, Patel NU, Pinto PA, Polascik TJ, Spilseth B, Starcevich JB, Tammisetti VS, Taneja SS, Turkbey B, Verma S, Ward JF, Warlick CA, Weinberger AR, Yu J, Zagoria RJ, Rosenkrantz AB. Variability of the Positive Predictive Value of PI-RADS for Prostate MRI across 26 Centers: Experience of the Society of Abdominal Radiology Prostate Cancer Disease-focused Panel. Radiology 2020, 296: 76-84. PMID: 32315265, PMCID: PMC7373346, DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020190646.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPositive predictive valuePI-RADS scoreProstate cancerPI-RADSGleason scorePredictive valueRetrospective cross-sectional studyHigh-grade prostate cancerObserved positive predictive valueOverall positive predictive valueUntreated prostate cancerProstate MRIInterquartile rangeSignificant prostate cancerProstate Imaging ReportingCross-sectional studyMixed-model logistic regressionProstate cancer diseaseReporting Data SystemMRI lesionsBiopsy resultsActive surveillanceClinical careMRI scansImaging Reporting