2021
LI-RADS treatment response lexicon: review, refresh and resolve with emerging data
Ram R, Kampalath R, Shenoy-Bhangle AS, Arora S, Kielar AZ, Mendiratta-Lala M. LI-RADS treatment response lexicon: review, refresh and resolve with emerging data. Abdominal Radiology 2021, 46: 3549-3557. PMID: 34106301, DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03149-x.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTreatment response algorithmHepatocellular carcinomaRegional treatmentData System treatment response algorithmLI-RADS treatment response algorithmLoco-regional therapyLoco-regional treatmentLiver Imaging ReportingTreatment response assessmentCross-sectional modalitiesType of treatmentRegional therapyCurrent guidelinesTreatment responseResponse assessmentImaging ReportingCarcinomaTreatmentRole of the radiologist at HCC multidisciplinary conference and use of the LR-TR algorithm for improving workflow
Shenoy-Bhangle AS, Tsai LL, Masciocchi M, Arora SS, Kielar AZ. Role of the radiologist at HCC multidisciplinary conference and use of the LR-TR algorithm for improving workflow. Abdominal Radiology 2021, 46: 3558-3564. PMID: 33904990, DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03094-9.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsLiver-directed locoregional therapiesLR-TR algorithmHepatocellular carcinomaLocoregional therapyMultidisciplinary conferenceLiver observationsTreatment of HCCLiver-directed therapiesLiver Imaging ReportingOptimal patient managementPost-treatment imagingRadiologic findingsLiver diseaseOncology patientsTransplant eligibilityInterdisciplinary managementHCC screeningPatient managementMultidisciplinary discussionPatient careImaging ReportingPatientsTherapyRadiologistsDisease
2020
Variability of the Positive Predictive Value of PI-RADS for Prostate MRI across 26 Centers: Experience of the Society of Abdominal Radiology Prostate Cancer Disease-focused Panel
Westphalen AC, McCulloch CE, Anaokar JM, Arora S, Barashi NS, Barentsz JO, Bathala TK, Bittencourt LK, Booker MT, Braxton VG, Carroll PR, Casalino DD, Chang SD, Coakley FV, Dhatt R, Eberhardt SC, Foster BR, Froemming AT, Fütterer JJ, Ganeshan DM, Gertner MR, Mankowski Gettle L, Ghai S, Gupta RT, Hahn ME, Houshyar R, Kim C, Kim CK, Lall C, Margolis DJA, McRae SE, Oto A, Parsons RB, Patel NU, Pinto PA, Polascik TJ, Spilseth B, Starcevich JB, Tammisetti VS, Taneja SS, Turkbey B, Verma S, Ward JF, Warlick CA, Weinberger AR, Yu J, Zagoria RJ, Rosenkrantz AB. Variability of the Positive Predictive Value of PI-RADS for Prostate MRI across 26 Centers: Experience of the Society of Abdominal Radiology Prostate Cancer Disease-focused Panel. Radiology 2020, 296: 76-84. PMID: 32315265, PMCID: PMC7373346, DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020190646.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPositive predictive valuePI-RADS scoreProstate cancerPI-RADSGleason scorePredictive valueRetrospective cross-sectional studyHigh-grade prostate cancerObserved positive predictive valueOverall positive predictive valueUntreated prostate cancerProstate MRIInterquartile rangeSignificant prostate cancerProstate Imaging ReportingCross-sectional studyMixed-model logistic regressionProstate cancer diseaseReporting Data SystemMRI lesionsBiopsy resultsActive surveillanceClinical careMRI scansImaging Reporting