2022
Patterns of care and outcomes of outpatient percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States: Insights from Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample
Milioglou I, Guha A, Chouari F, Chaturvedi A, Clark KAA, Kochar A, Sung JG, Velazquez EJ, Ahmad T, Desai NR. Patterns of care and outcomes of outpatient percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States: Insights from Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample. Hellenic Journal Of Cardiology 2022, 65: 51-52. PMID: 35272018, DOI: 10.1016/j.hjc.2022.03.001.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2021
Trends in transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in the United States, 2008-2018
Clark KA, Chouairi F, Kay B, Reinhardt SW, Miller PE, Fuery M, Mullan CW, Guha A, Ahmad T, Desai NR. Trends in transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in the United States, 2008-2018. American Heart Journal 2021, 243: 87-91. PMID: 34571040, DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.03.017.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchNational Trends in the Burden of Atrial Fibrillation During Hospital Admissions for Heart Failure
Reinhardt SW, Chouairi F, Miller PE, Clark KAA, Kay B, Fuery M, Guha A, Freeman JV, Ahmad T, Desai NR, Friedman DJ. National Trends in the Burden of Atrial Fibrillation During Hospital Admissions for Heart Failure. Journal Of The American Heart Association 2021, 10: e019412. PMID: 34013736, PMCID: PMC8483517, DOI: 10.1161/jaha.120.019412.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsReduced ejection fractionComorbid atrial fibrillationHeart failureAtrial fibrillationEjection fractionHospital mortalityHF hospitalizationBackground Heart failureConclusion Atrial fibrillationWhite individualsNational Inpatient SampleMedian hospital chargesMore comorbiditiesComorbid hypertensionHF admissionsHF outcomesPatient demographicsDiabetes mellitusHospital admissionHospital chargesInpatient SampleVascular diseaseHospitalizationPatientsMortality
2017
Concurrent Central Venous Stent and Central Venous Access Device Placement Does Not Compromise Stent Patency or Catheter Function in Patients with Malignant Central Venous Obstruction
Clark K, Chick J, Reddy S, Shin B, Nadolski G, Clark T, Trerotola S. Concurrent Central Venous Stent and Central Venous Access Device Placement Does Not Compromise Stent Patency or Catheter Function in Patients with Malignant Central Venous Obstruction. Journal Of Vascular And Interventional Radiology 2017, 28: 602-607. PMID: 28238580, DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2016.12.1222.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCentral venous access devicesCentral venous obstructionCatheter functionStent patencyStent stenosisVenous obstructionClinical symptomsVenous stentsType of CVADCentral venous access device placementControl groupSuperior vena cava syndromeRecurrent clinical symptomsVena cava syndromeVenous access devicesCVAD placementStent revisionSymptomatic stenosisConsecutive patientsPatientsMalignant compressionStenosisPatencyDevice placementClinical performance