2020
Ambivalent Effects of Positive Contact Between Women and Men on Collective Actions for Women’s Rights
Vázquez A, López-Rodríguez L, Gómez Á, Dovidio J. Ambivalent Effects of Positive Contact Between Women and Men on Collective Actions for Women’s Rights. Personality And Social Psychology Bulletin 2020, 47: 1358-1373. PMID: 33272116, DOI: 10.1177/0146167220974162.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2016
Improving intergroup relations
Schellhaas F, Dovidio J. Improving intergroup relations. Current Opinion In Psychology 2016, 11: 10-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.04.002.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchIntergroup relationsPsychological processesPositive intergroup attitudesPositive intergroup contactIntergroup attitudesIntergroup contactSocial perceptionFuture researchCognitionInterventionPerceptionDisadvantaged groupsAttitudesRelationConflictExperienceBiasStructural inequalitiesPractical challengesResearch
2012
From attitudes to (in)action: the darker side of ‘we’
Dovidio J, Saguy T, Gaertner S, Thomas E. From attitudes to (in)action: the darker side of ‘we’. 2012, 248-268. DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781139022736.015.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchCommon ingroup identity modelIntergroup contactIdentity modelPositive intergroup contactIntergroup prejudiceIntergroup attitudesPsychological processesCognitive representationsIntergroup relationsPrejudice reductionLine of researchGroup perceptionsIndividual prejudiceImmediate tensionsNegative attitudesPrejudicePrevious researchPotent interventionAdvantaged groupsDark sideSocial groupsEffectiveness of contactAttitudesTajfelPsychologists
2009
The Irony of Harmony
Saguy T, Tausch N, Dovidio J, Pratto F. The Irony of Harmony. Psychological Science 2009, 20: 114-121. PMID: 19152543, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02261.x.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPositive intergroup contactIntergroup contactPositive contactIntergroup inequalityIntergroup tensionsStudy 1Study 2Members' perceptionsSocial changePerceptionActions of membersGroup behaviorPerceptions of JewsAdvantaged groupsIsraeli ArabsParticipantsExperimental groupExpectationsDisadvantaged groupsSupportIntergroup differencesAttitudesInterventionImplicationsCommonalities
2008
The Fragility of Intergroup Relations
Pearson A, West T, Dovidio J, Powers S, Buck R, Henning R. The Fragility of Intergroup Relations. Psychological Science 2008, 19: 1272-1279. PMID: 19121137, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02236.x.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsIntergroup contactIntergroup interactionsPositive intergroup contactIntergroup relationsIntergroup communicationGreater anxietyDyadic conversationsLess anxietyDelay conditionsTemporal disruptionReal-time conversationsAnxietyPractical implicationsEthnic majorityAudiovisual feedbackLatino participantsDyadsSocial dynamicsConversationMinority groupsLess interestDisengagementIntergroupParticipantsDynamic process
1998
Intergroup Bias: Status, Differentiation, and a Common In-Group Identity
Dovidio J, Gaertner S, Validzic A. Intergroup Bias: Status, Differentiation, and a Common In-Group Identity. Journal Of Personality And Social Psychology 1998, 75: 109-120. PMID: 9686453, DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.109.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCommon In-Group IdentityPositive intergroup contactGroup identity modelPresent researchIntergroup biasM. HewstoneIntergroup contactTask performanceIdentity modelTask dimensionsTheoretical integrationLaboratory groupsHewstoneBiasTaskResearchInterventionGroup representationsRepresentationFindingsIdentityExpertise