2022
The way they look: Phenotypic prototypicality shapes the perceived intergroup attitudes of in- and out-group members
Kunst J, Dovidio J, Bailey A, Obaidi M. The way they look: Phenotypic prototypicality shapes the perceived intergroup attitudes of in- and out-group members. Journal Of Experimental Social Psychology 2022, 100: 104303. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104303.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchOut-group membersIntergroup attitudesExperiment 2Pre-registered experimentsGroups of participantsIntergroup contactIntergroup relationsStigma consciousnessExperiment 3Experiment 4Experiment 1Interracial relationsGroup membersPersonal attitudesPrevious researchWhite participantsPrototypicalityGroup targetsParticipantsLittle prejudiceAttitudesFuture directionsSocial implicationsWhite AmericansRepresentative sample
2021
When intergroup helping helps intergroup relations: The moderating role of trust in the outgroup
Halabi S, Dovidio J, Nadler A. When intergroup helping helps intergroup relations: The moderating role of trust in the outgroup. Journal Of Experimental Social Psychology 2021, 95: 104141. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104141.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchHigh-status groupsLow-status groupsOffers of helpStatus groupsLow-status group membersMinimal group contextIsraeli JewsIntergroup HelpingIntergroup responsesRole of trustApplied implicationsGroup contextStudy 1Status relationsGroup membersNegative consequencesGreater trustPresent researchReal groupsIsraeli ArabsOutgroupTrustIntergroup Behavior
Levy A, Dovidio J. Intergroup Behavior. 2021 DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.291.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchIntergroup behaviorDevelopment of interventionsIntergroup biasPsychological processesIntergroup relationsSocial categorizationProsocial behaviorPsychological dynamicsWork teamsForms of biasNegative orientationGroup membersOwn groupTypes of groupsSuch biasFavorable attitudesConsequent relationshipBiasBeneficial exchangeBehaviorPerceptionMotivationFeelingsPrejudiceHostility
2019
Primes and Consequences: A Systematic Review of Meritocracy in Intergroup Relations
Madeira A, Costa-Lopes R, Dovidio J, Freitas G, Mascarenhas M. Primes and Consequences: A Systematic Review of Meritocracy in Intergroup Relations. Frontiers In Psychology 2019, 10: 2007. PMID: 31607971, PMCID: PMC6761281, DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02007.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2017
Patient Stigma, Medical Interactions, and Health Care Disparities: A Selective Review
Penner L, Phelan S, Earnshaw V, Albrecht T, Dovidio J. Patient Stigma, Medical Interactions, and Health Care Disparities: A Selective Review. 2017, 183-202. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190243470.013.12.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchRacial minority group membersMinority group membersPsychological processesStigmatized groupsSelective reviewGroup membersPoor quality communicationHealth care providersHealth care disparitiesSocial groupsMedical interactionsStigmaPoor outcomePatients' stigmaCare providersStigmatized patientsCare disparitiesHealth statusHealthcare providersQuality communicationHealthcare disparitiesQuality of healthcareCertain cancersIndividualsPatients
2016
The Common Ingroup Identity Model and the Development of a Functional Perspective: A Cross-National Collaboration
Gaertner S, Guerra R, Rebelo M, Dovidio J, Hehman E, Deegan M. The Common Ingroup Identity Model and the Development of a Functional Perspective: A Cross-National Collaboration. 2016, 105-120. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-42727-0_5.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchCommon ingroup identity modelIdentity modelOne-group representationMinority group membersMembers of majorityGroup members' preferencesGroup distinctivenessFunctional perspectiveGroup goalsIdentity representationMinority groupsGroup membersMajority groupDual identityGroup disparitiesMembers' preferencesOne-groupSubgroup identificationCollective actionRepresentationFunctional approachAttentionPreferencesPrejudiceDistinctiveness
2013
Insecure Status Relations Shape Preferences for the Content of Intergroup Contact
Saguy T, Dovidio J. Insecure Status Relations Shape Preferences for the Content of Intergroup Contact. Personality And Social Psychology Bulletin 2013, 39: 1030-1042. PMID: 23719622, DOI: 10.1177/0146167213487078.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsLow-status group membersIntergroup contactStatus legitimacyStatus differencesStatus stabilitySocial identity theoryGroup membersLow-status groupsHigh-status ethnic groupIdentity theoryStudy 1Study 2Group statusShape preferencesMembers' willingnessU.S. sampleGreater desireCurrent researchCommonalitiesWillingnessRecent workPreferencesEthnic groups
2009
Promoting Reconciliation Through the Satisfaction of the Emotional Needs of Victimized and Perpetrating Group Members: The Needs-Based Model of Reconciliation
Shnabel N, Nadler A, Ullrich J, Dovidio J, Carmi D. Promoting Reconciliation Through the Satisfaction of the Emotional Needs of Victimized and Perpetrating Group Members: The Needs-Based Model of Reconciliation. Personality And Social Psychology Bulletin 2009, 35: 1021-1030. PMID: 19498070, DOI: 10.1177/0146167209336610.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsSocial exchange interactionsModel of reconciliationNeeds-based modelOne's ingroupPerpetrator groupTheoretical implicationsEmotional needsParties' willingnessIngroupGreater willingnessGroup membersPerpetratorsVictimsWillingnessVictimizedSatisfactionReconciliationImplicationsMembersEmpowermentGroupAcceptanceOpposite effectNeed
2008
Intragroup dissonance: Responses to ingroup violation of personal values
Glasford D, Pratto F, Dovidio J. Intragroup dissonance: Responses to ingroup violation of personal values. Journal Of Experimental Social Psychology 2008, 44: 1057-1064. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2007.10.004.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2002
Ingroup identification as a moderator of positive–negative asymmetry in social discrimination
Hodson G, Dovidio J, Esses V. Ingroup identification as a moderator of positive–negative asymmetry in social discrimination. European Journal Of Social Psychology 2002, 33: 215-233. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.141.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchIngroup identificationNegative outcomesDiscrimination asymmetriesMinimal group paradigmHigh ingroup identificationIntergroup behaviorOutcome valenceGroup paradigmNegative resourcesGroup membershipGroup membersIngroupValenceOutgroupParticipantsParadigmDiscriminationImplicationsMembershipOutcomesPresent investigationAsymmetryBehavior
1997
Extending the Benefits of Recategorization: Evaluations, Self-Disclosure, and Helping
Dovidio J, Gaertner S, Validzic A, Matoka K, Johnson B, Frazier S. Extending the Benefits of Recategorization: Evaluations, Self-Disclosure, and Helping. Journal Of Experimental Social Psychology 1997, 33: 401-420. PMID: 9247370, DOI: 10.1006/jesp.1997.1327.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchIntergroup biasCommon ingroup identity modelIntergroup contact situationsOne-group representationThree-person groupsIntergroup behaviorEvaluative biasIdentity modelSelf-DisclosureGroup membersRecategorizationPresent researchStrong impressionParticipantsBiasContact situationsSeparate groupsRepresentationFavoritismSingle groupRatingsDifferent groupsImpressionMembersGroup
1996
The Contact Hypothesis: The Role of a Common Ingroup Identity on Reducing Intergroup Bias among Majority and Minority Group Members
Gaertner S, Rust M, Dovidio J, Bachman B, Anastasio P. The Contact Hypothesis: The Role of a Common Ingroup Identity on Reducing Intergroup Bias among Majority and Minority Group Members. 1996, 230-260. DOI: 10.4135/9781483327648.n10.Peer-Reviewed Original Research