2017
General Concepts About Inclusion in Organizations: A Psychological Approach to Understanding Diversity and Inclusion in Organizations
Dovidio J, Abad-Merino S, Tabernero C. General Concepts About Inclusion in Organizations: A Psychological Approach to Understanding Diversity and Inclusion in Organizations. Industrial Relations & Conflict Management 2017, 23-31. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-66393-7_2.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMinority group membersOutgroup membersPsychological dynamicsPsychological approachPsychological challengesBenefits of diversityGroup identityUnfair barriersUnderstanding diversityDominant approachEffective organizationSocial circumstancesIngroupOrganizationPeoplePerceptionFeelingsThoughtMulticulturalismColorblindnessMembersDifferent groupsIndividualsPolicyProfound impact
2015
Color-Blindness and Commonality
Dovidio J, Gaertner S, Saguy T. Color-Blindness and Commonality. American Behavioral Scientist 2015, 59: 1518-1538. DOI: 10.1177/0002764215580591.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchSubtle racismColor-blind racismIntergroup attitudesPsychological perspectiveAutomatic processRacial biasesSubtle biasWhite AmericansUnfair treatmentBlack AmericansPervasive influenceOvert racismContemporary formsRacismDisadvantaged statusHierarchical relationsColor blindnessDisadvantaged groupsPresent articleBiasesAmericansAttitudesDifferent groupsInterventionArticle
2012
Social Conflict, Harmony, and Integration
Dovidio J, Gaertner S, Mayville E, Perry S. Social Conflict, Harmony, and Integration. 2012 DOI: 10.1002/9781118133880.hop205020.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchIntergroup biasSocial psychological studiesSocial integrationIntergroup attitudesPsychological processesIntergroup relationsIntergroup interactionsPsychological basisPsychological studiesTheoretical implicationsSocial conflictTheoretical emphasisSocial processesConflictBrief historical overviewIndividual membersBiasGreater understandingDifferent processesAttitudesDifferent groupsInterventionImplicationsChapterIntegrationDivergent Intergroup Perspectives
Dovidio J, Saguy T, West T, Gaertner S. Divergent Intergroup Perspectives. 2012, 158-176. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199747672.013.0010.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchIntergroup perspectiveIntergroup relationsIntergroup interactionsPsychological basisPsychological interventionsDifferent social categoriesInitial biasesSocial categoriesWay peopleGroup perspectiveDifferent goalsMutual understandingConflictPerceptionPerspectiveBiasesBehaviorAbstract InteractionsDifferent groupsMiscommunicationInterventionExpectationsPeopleMembershipMembers
2005
Aversive Racism: Bias without Intention
Gaertner S, Dovidio J, Nier J, Hodson G, Houlette M. Aversive Racism: Bias without Intention. 2005, 377-393. DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-3455-5_19.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchAversive racismCommon ingroup identity modelNormal psychological processesBehaviour of whitesPsychological processesSocial categorizationIdentity modelRacial biasesNegative feelingsUnintentional discriminationPersonal prejudiceContemporary racismRacismFeelingsPrejudiceBiasesBeliefsCategorizationIntentionLegal implicationsDiscriminationConflictDifferent groupsImplicationsBiasAversive Racism: Bias without Intention
Gaertner S, Dovidio J, Nier J, Hodson G, Houlette M. Aversive Racism: Bias without Intention. 2005, 377-393. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-09467-0_19.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchAversive racismCommon ingroup identity modelNormal psychological processesBehaviour of whitesPsychological processesSocial categorizationIdentity modelRacial biasesNegative feelingsUnintentional discriminationPersonal prejudiceContemporary racismRacismFeelingsPrejudiceBiasesBeliefsCategorizationIntentionLegal implicationsDiscriminationConflictDifferent groupsImplicationsBias
1999
Reducing Prejudice
Dovidio J, Gaertner S. Reducing Prejudice. Current Directions In Psychological Science 1999, 8: 101-105. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8721.00024.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchIntergroup contactBasis of prejudiceNegative emotional statesIntergroup strategiesEmotional statesContemporary prejudiceIndividualized perceptionsGroup boundariesPrejudiceIntentional formsFavorable attitudesSuch inconsistenciesContemporary formsPerceptionAttitudesDifferent groupsIndividualsInconsistenciesTraditional formsInterventionPeopleRepresentationGroupMembersStrategies
1997
Extending the Benefits of Recategorization: Evaluations, Self-Disclosure, and Helping
Dovidio J, Gaertner S, Validzic A, Matoka K, Johnson B, Frazier S. Extending the Benefits of Recategorization: Evaluations, Self-Disclosure, and Helping. Journal Of Experimental Social Psychology 1997, 33: 401-420. PMID: 9247370, DOI: 10.1006/jesp.1997.1327.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchIntergroup biasCommon ingroup identity modelIntergroup contact situationsOne-group representationThree-person groupsIntergroup behaviorEvaluative biasIdentity modelSelf-DisclosureGroup membersRecategorizationPresent researchStrong impressionParticipantsBiasContact situationsSeparate groupsRepresentationFavoritismSingle groupRatingsDifferent groupsImpressionMembersGroup
1994
The Contact Hypothesis
Gaertner S, Rust M, Dovidio J, Bachman B, Anastasio P. The Contact Hypothesis. Small Group Research 1994, 25: 224-249. DOI: 10.1177/1046496494252005.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchCognitive representationsAffective reactionsContact hypothesisCommon ingroup identity modelIntergroup biasIdentity modelCooperative interdependenceWeak representationRacial identityEgalitarian normsHigh schoolSurvey studyEqual statusRepresentationBiasSchoolsIngroupFavorabilityAmerican identityThefeaturesHypothesisIdentityStudent bodyDifferent groupsStudents