2020
Does a Common Ingroup Identity Reduce Weight Bias? Only When Weight Discrimination Is Salient
Brochu P, Banfield J, Dovidio J. Does a Common Ingroup Identity Reduce Weight Bias? Only When Weight Discrimination Is Salient. Frontiers In Psychology 2020, 10: 3020. PMID: 32038393, PMCID: PMC6985568, DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03020.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2016
The Common Ingroup Identity Model and the Development of a Functional Perspective: A Cross-National Collaboration
Gaertner S, Guerra R, Rebelo M, Dovidio J, Hehman E, Deegan M. The Common Ingroup Identity Model and the Development of a Functional Perspective: A Cross-National Collaboration. 2016, 105-120. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-42727-0_5.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchCommon ingroup identity modelIdentity modelOne-group representationMinority group membersMembers of majorityGroup members' preferencesGroup distinctivenessFunctional perspectiveGroup goalsIdentity representationMinority groupsGroup membersMajority groupDual identityGroup disparitiesMembers' preferencesOne-groupSubgroup identificationCollective actionRepresentationFunctional approachAttentionPreferencesPrejudiceDistinctiveness
2014
Reducing Intergroup Bias, The Common Ingroup Identity Model
Gaertner S, Dovidio J. Reducing Intergroup Bias, The Common Ingroup Identity Model. 2014 DOI: 10.4324/9781315804576.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchIntergroup biasIntergroup relationsAversive racismCommon ingroup identity modelHarmonious intergroup relationsCategory-based strategyCommon ingroup identityAnti-Black attitudesIngroup identityIdentity modelTraditional racismFurther theoretical developmentMutual differentiationReciprocal relationshipTheoretical underpinningsContemporary racismDecategorizationRecategorizationEmpirical evidenceLaboratory interventionBiasPromising avenueRacismTheoretical developmentsConflict
2012
From attitudes to (in)action: the darker side of ‘we’
Dovidio J, Saguy T, Gaertner S, Thomas E. From attitudes to (in)action: the darker side of ‘we’. 2012, 248-268. DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781139022736.015.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchCommon ingroup identity modelIntergroup contactIdentity modelPositive intergroup contactIntergroup prejudiceIntergroup attitudesPsychological processesCognitive representationsIntergroup relationsPrejudice reductionLine of researchGroup perceptionsIndividual prejudiceImmediate tensionsNegative attitudesPrejudicePrevious researchPotent interventionAdvantaged groupsDark sideSocial groupsEffectiveness of contactAttitudesTajfelPsychologists
2011
Common Ingroup Identity Model
Gaertner S, Dovidio J. Common Ingroup Identity Model. 2011 DOI: 10.1002/9780470672532.wbepp041.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2008
The Other Side of We: When Outgroup Members Express Common Identity
Gómez Á, Dovidio J, Huici C, Gaertner S, Cuadrado I. The Other Side of We: When Outgroup Members Express Common Identity. Personality And Social Psychology Bulletin 2008, 34: 1613-1626. PMID: 18832337, DOI: 10.1177/0146167208323600.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsIntergroup biasOutgroup membersIngroup membersSuperordinate categoryCommon ingroup identity modelLess intergroup biasIntergroup attitudesIntergroup contactCommon identityIdentity threatSuperordinate identityIdentity modelHigh school studentsRepresentation of membersHypothesized effectsNegative orientationGreater willingnessPrevious researchSchool studentsRelative statusStudentsIngroupWillingnessBiasIdentityAll in this together? Group representations and policy support
Beaton A, Dovidio J, Léger N. All in this together? Group representations and policy support. Journal Of Experimental Social Psychology 2008, 44: 808-817. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2007.07.002.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchAddressing Contemporary Racism: The Common Ingroup Identity Model
Gaertner S, Dovidio J. Addressing Contemporary Racism: The Common Ingroup Identity Model. Nebraska Symposium On Motivation 2008, 53: 111-133. PMID: 18232132, DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-73233-6_5.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2007
Another view of “we”: Majority and minority group perspectives on a common ingroup identity
Dovidio J, Gaertner S, Saguy T. Another view of “we”: Majority and minority group perspectives on a common ingroup identity. European Review Of Social Psychology 2007, 18: 296-330. DOI: 10.1080/10463280701726132.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchCommon ingroup identity modelCommon ingroup identityMinority group perspectivesIntergroup biasesIngroup identityIntergroup interactionsIdentity modelSocial categorisationGroup perspectiveRecent researchDifferent preferencesMinority groupsPotential implicationsSocial changeRecategorisationPrejudiceDifferent formsBiasesResearchSelfIdentityPreferencesInitial formulationDiscriminationImplications
2005
Understanding and Addressing Contemporary Racism: From Aversive Racism to the Common Ingroup Identity Model
Gaertner S, Dovidio J. Understanding and Addressing Contemporary Racism: From Aversive Racism to the Common Ingroup Identity Model. Journal Of Social Issues 2005, 61: 615-639. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00424.x.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchCommon ingroup identity modelAversive racismIdentity modelCommon ingroup identityIngroup identitySocial categorizationSocial identityContemporary racismPernicious effectsProfessional relationshipsRacismScientific agendaResearchJust societyCategorizationIdentityBiasCollaborative researchBrief discussionPursuitRelationshipSocial Identities and Social Context: Social Attitudes and Personal Well-Being
Dovidio J, Gaertner S, Pearson A, Riek B. Social Identities and Social Context: Social Attitudes and Personal Well-Being. Advances In Group Processes 2005, 22: 231-260. DOI: 10.1016/s0882-6145(05)22009-x.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchSocial identityCommon ingroup identity modelSocial contextMultiple social identitiesDifferent social identitiesIntergroup biasIntergroup relationsSocial categorizationIdentity processesIdentity modelSuperordinate groupPeople's responsesPersonal valuesPhysical healthSocial attitudesDifferent identitiesAttitudesPresent chapterIdentitySeparate groupsPerceptionContextOwn workPersonalCategorizationAversive Racism: Bias without Intention
Gaertner S, Dovidio J, Nier J, Hodson G, Houlette M. Aversive Racism: Bias without Intention. 2005, 377-393. DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-3455-5_19.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchAversive racismCommon ingroup identity modelNormal psychological processesBehaviour of whitesPsychological processesSocial categorizationIdentity modelRacial biasesNegative feelingsUnintentional discriminationPersonal prejudiceContemporary racismRacismFeelingsPrejudiceBiasesBeliefsCategorizationIntentionLegal implicationsDiscriminationConflictDifferent groupsImplicationsBiasAversive Racism: Bias without Intention
Gaertner S, Dovidio J, Nier J, Hodson G, Houlette M. Aversive Racism: Bias without Intention. 2005, 377-393. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-09467-0_19.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchAversive racismCommon ingroup identity modelNormal psychological processesBehaviour of whitesPsychological processesSocial categorizationIdentity modelRacial biasesNegative feelingsUnintentional discriminationPersonal prejudiceContemporary racismRacismFeelingsPrejudiceBiasesBeliefsCategorizationIntentionLegal implicationsDiscriminationConflictDifferent groupsImplicationsBias
1997
Extending the Benefits of Recategorization: Evaluations, Self-Disclosure, and Helping
Dovidio J, Gaertner S, Validzic A, Matoka K, Johnson B, Frazier S. Extending the Benefits of Recategorization: Evaluations, Self-Disclosure, and Helping. Journal Of Experimental Social Psychology 1997, 33: 401-420. PMID: 9247370, DOI: 10.1006/jesp.1997.1327.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchIntergroup biasCommon ingroup identity modelIntergroup contact situationsOne-group representationThree-person groupsIntergroup behaviorEvaluative biasIdentity modelSelf-DisclosureGroup membersRecategorizationPresent researchStrong impressionParticipantsBiasContact situationsSeparate groupsRepresentationFavoritismSingle groupRatingsDifferent groupsImpressionMembersGroup
1996
Revisiting the contact hypothesis: The induction of a common ingroup identity
Gaertner S, Dovidio J, Bachman B. Revisiting the contact hypothesis: The induction of a common ingroup identity. International Journal Of Intercultural Relations 1996, 20: 271-290. DOI: 10.1016/0147-1767(96)00019-3.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchCommon ingroup identityIntergroup biasIngroup identityOutgroup membersContact hypothesisCommon ingroup identity modelFormer outgroup membersDual identitySuperordinate group identityIntergroup attitudesCognitive representationsMotivational processesIngroup membersSuperordinate identityIdentity modelCooperative interdependencePositive feelingsGreater perceptionSituational contextGroup identityMembers' perceptionsContextual featuresPerceptionSocial entitiesEgalitarian norms
1994
The Contact Hypothesis
Gaertner S, Rust M, Dovidio J, Bachman B, Anastasio P. The Contact Hypothesis. Small Group Research 1994, 25: 224-249. DOI: 10.1177/1046496494252005.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchCognitive representationsAffective reactionsContact hypothesisCommon ingroup identity modelIntergroup biasIdentity modelCooperative interdependenceWeak representationRacial identityEgalitarian normsHigh schoolSurvey studyEqual statusRepresentationBiasSchoolsIngroupFavorabilityAmerican identityThefeaturesHypothesisIdentityStudent bodyDifferent groupsStudents
1993
The Common Ingroup Identity Model: Recategorization and the Reduction of Intergroup Bias
Gaertner S, Dovidio J, Anastasio P, Bachman B, Rust M. The Common Ingroup Identity Model: Recategorization and the Reduction of Intergroup Bias. European Review Of Social Psychology 1993, 4: 1-26. DOI: 10.1080/14792779343000004.Peer-Reviewed Original Research