2022
Trends in Use of Single- vs Dual-Chamber Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators Among Patients Without a Pacing Indication, 2010-2018
Borne RT, Varosy P, Lan Z, Masoudi FA, Curtis JP, Matlock DD, Peterson PN. Trends in Use of Single- vs Dual-Chamber Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators Among Patients Without a Pacing Indication, 2010-2018. JAMA Network Open 2022, 5: e223429. PMID: 35315917, PMCID: PMC8941353, DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.3429.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsDual-chamber ICDFirst-time ICD implantationPacing indicationICD implantationMedian odds ratioPatient characteristicsOdds ratioAtrial leadNational Cardiovascular Data Registry ICD RegistryCardiac resynchronization therapy indicationDual-chamber ICD implantationMulticenter cross-sectional studyBradycardia pacing indicationSingle-chamber ICDHospital-level variationHigh procedural riskCross-sectional studyLow-value practicesImplantable cardioverter defibrillatorLow-value careCochran-Armitage trend testImplantable cardioverter-defibrillator systemsDual-chamber devicesCardioverter-defibrillator systemsReal-world practice
2019
USE AND OUTCOMES OF DUAL CHAMBER AND CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY DEFIBRILLATORS AMONG OLDER PATIENTS UNDERGOING ICD IMPLANTATION WITH A VENTRICULAR PACING INDICATION: AN ANALYSIS OF THE NATIONAL CARDIOVASCULAR DATA ICD REGISTRY
Borne R, Bao H, Curtis J, Masoudi F, Zipse M, Sandhu A, Hsu J, Peterson P. USE AND OUTCOMES OF DUAL CHAMBER AND CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY DEFIBRILLATORS AMONG OLDER PATIENTS UNDERGOING ICD IMPLANTATION WITH A VENTRICULAR PACING INDICATION: AN ANALYSIS OF THE NATIONAL CARDIOVASCULAR DATA ICD REGISTRY. Journal Of The American College Of Cardiology 2019, 73: 389. DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(19)30997-0.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2012
Variation in Use of Dual-Chamber Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: Results From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry
Matlock DD, Peterson PN, Wang Y, Curtis JP, Reynolds MR, Varosy PD, Masoudi FA. Variation in Use of Dual-Chamber Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: Results From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. JAMA Internal Medicine 2012, 172: 634-641. PMID: 22529229, PMCID: PMC8317619, DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.394.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedCluster AnalysisComorbidityCross-Sectional StudiesDeath, Sudden, CardiacDefibrillators, ImplantableEquipment DesignFemaleHospitalsHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNew EnglandOdds RatioPacemaker, ArtificialPacific StatesPredictive Value of TestsPrimary PreventionRegistriesConceptsDual-chamber ICDDual-chamber devicesPrimary preventionDual-Chamber Implantable CardioverterMultivariate hierarchical logistic regressionNational Cardiovascular Data RegistrySingle-chamber ICDHospital-level variationStrong independent predictorSudden cardiac deathCross-sectional studyHealth care providersHierarchical logistic regressionPacing indicationCardiac deathHospital clusteringIndependent predictorsPatient factorsPhysician factorsHospital ratesImplantable cardioverterCare providersIdentical patientsCurrent evidenceData registry