Featured Publications
Cost‐effectiveness of second‐line therapies in adults with chronic immune thrombocytopenia
Goshua G, Sinha P, Kunst N, Pischel L, Lee AI, Cuker A. Cost‐effectiveness of second‐line therapies in adults with chronic immune thrombocytopenia. American Journal Of Hematology 2022, 98: 122-130. PMID: 35147241, PMCID: PMC9365880, DOI: 10.1002/ajh.26497.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsThrombopoietin receptor agonistsChronic immune thrombocytopeniaSecond-line therapyImmune thrombocytopeniaEarly useCurrent practice trendsProbabilistic sensitivity analysesCost-effective treatmentFirst cost-effectiveness analysisCost-effectiveness analysisU.S. health systemLack of evidenceEarly splenectomyHematology (ASH) guidelinesReceptor agonistCurrent guidelinesSplenectomyClinical practicePractice trendsTherapyHealth systemCost-effective strategyRituximabThrombocytopeniaAmerican Society
2024
Cost-effectiveness of Enasidenib versus conventional care for older patients with IDH2-mutant refractory/relapsed AML
Alhajahjeh A, Patel K, Shallis R, Podoltsev N, Kewan T, Stempel J, Mendez L, Huntington S, Stahl M, Goshua G, Bewersdorf J, Zeidan A. Cost-effectiveness of Enasidenib versus conventional care for older patients with IDH2-mutant refractory/relapsed AML. Leukemia & Lymphoma 2024, ahead-of-print: 1-9. PMID: 39560957, DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2024.2426073.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConventional care regimensOlder patientsTreatment of older patientsIDH2 inhibitor enasidenibIncremental cost-effectiveness ratioCost-effectiveness ratioProbabilistic sensitivity analysesR/R AMLRefractory/relapsed AMLEvent-freeCost-effective treatmentEnasidenibCare regimensAMLPatientsCost-effectiveIncremental costLife yearsConventional careR/RIncremental effectSurvivalTreatment