2024
Intravascular imaging-guided vs. angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in high-risk patients and complex coronary anatomies
Teixeira L, Ferreira R, Navalha D, Pasqualotto E, Fae I, Gibicoski T, Chavez M, Talavera A, Athayde G, Chamie D. Intravascular imaging-guided vs. angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in high-risk patients and complex coronary anatomies. International Journal Of Cardiology 2024, 416: 132510. PMID: 39222885, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132510.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsHigh-risk patientsPercutaneous coronary interventionMeta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsRandomized controlled trialsTarget vessel failureComplex coronary anatomyCoronary anatomyComplex lesionsRisk ratioCardiovascular mortalityStent thrombosisMyocardial infarctionControlled trialsAngiography-guided percutaneous coronary interventionProcedure-related complicationsMeta-analysisRisk of MACEAdverse cardiac eventsConfidence intervalsSystematic reviewIntravascular imagingRandom-effects modelNo significant differenceCardiac eventsPrimary outcomeIntravascular Imaging–Guided Versus Angiography‐Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Trials
Sreenivasan J, Reddy R, Jamil Y, Malik A, Chamie D, Howard J, Nanna M, Mintz G, Maehara A, Ali Z, Moses J, Chen S, Chieffo A, Colombo A, Leon M, Lansky A, Ahmad Y. Intravascular Imaging–Guided Versus Angiography‐Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Trials. Journal Of The American Heart Association 2024, 13: e031111. PMID: 38214263, PMCID: PMC10926835, DOI: 10.1161/jaha.123.031111.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAdverse cardiac eventsPercutaneous coronary interventionAngiography-guided percutaneous coronary interventionTarget vessel revascularizationTarget-lesion revascularizationCardiac eventsCardiac deathImaging-guided percutaneous coronary interventionWeighted mean follow-up durationMeta-analysisPrimary outcomeMean follow-up durationStent thrombosisMeta-analysis of randomized trialsStudy-level meta-analysisComplex lesion subsetsIntravascular imagingAll-cause deathRandom-effects meta-analysisStandard of careIntention-to-treat principleUpdates of clinical guidelinesMixed-effects meta-regressionComplex percutaneous coronary interventionIntravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention
2023
TCT-641 Intravascular Imaging-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
Sreenivasan J, Reddy R, Jamil Y, Malik A, Chamie D, Howard J, Nanna M, Mintz G, Maehara A, Ali Z, Moses J, Chen S, Chieffo A, Colombo A, Leon M, Lansky A, Ahmad Y. TCT-641 Intravascular Imaging-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. Journal Of The American College Of Cardiology 2023, 82: b258. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.09.652.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2022
Intravascular Imaging for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Guidance and Optimization: The Evidence for Improved Patient Outcomes
Mintz G, Bourantas C, Chamié D. Intravascular Imaging for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Guidance and Optimization: The Evidence for Improved Patient Outcomes. Journal Of The Society For Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions 2022, 1: 100413. PMID: 39132365, PMCID: PMC11307675, DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100413.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchOptical coherence tomographyStent implantation procedureImprove patient outcomesDrug-eluting stent implantation proceduresImplantation procedureIntravascular ultrasoundPatient outcomesDrug-eluting stent implantationAngiography guidanceCoherence tomographyStent implantationRandomized controlled trial publicationsPercutaneous coronary intervention guidanceInterventional guidanceMeta-analysesTrial publicationsIntravascular imaging
2018
Imaging-guided pre-dilatation, stenting, post-dilatation: a protocolized approach highlighting the importance of intravascular imaging for implantation of bioresorbable scaffolds
Ali Z, Galougahi K, Shlofmitz R, Maehara A, Mintz G, Abizaid A, Chamié D, Hill J, Serruys P, Onuma Y, Stone G. Imaging-guided pre-dilatation, stenting, post-dilatation: a protocolized approach highlighting the importance of intravascular imaging for implantation of bioresorbable scaffolds. Expert Review Of Cardiovascular Therapy 2018, 16: 431-440. PMID: 29732926, DOI: 10.1080/14779072.2018.1473034.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2016
Role of invasive imaging in acute and long‐term assessment of bioresorbable scaffold technology
Chamié D, Garcia‐Garcia H, Costa R, Onuma Y, Abizaid A, Serruys P. Role of invasive imaging in acute and long‐term assessment of bioresorbable scaffold technology. Catheterization And Cardiovascular Interventions 2016, 88: 38-53. PMID: 27797463, DOI: 10.1002/ccd.26815.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsBioresorbable scaffold technologyPermanent metallic implantsDrug-eluting capabilityMechanical propertiesComplete bioresorptionScaffold technologyMetal platformMetallic implantsBioresorptionTreatment of coronary artery stenosisIntravascular imaging modalitiesTemporary vesselIntravascular imagingDevicesBRS implantationScaffolding supportVascular healingPost-implantation