2016
ONCOLOGISTS’ BARRIERS AND FACILITATORS FOR ONCOTYPE DX USE: QUALITATIVE STUDY
Roberts MC, Bryson A, Weinberger M, Dusetzina SB, Dinan MA, Reeder-Hayes K, Wheeler SB. ONCOLOGISTS’ BARRIERS AND FACILITATORS FOR ONCOTYPE DX USE: QUALITATIVE STUDY. International Journal Of Technology Assessment In Health Care 2016, 32: 355-361. PMID: 27958190, PMCID: PMC6526532, DOI: 10.1017/s026646231600060x.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAdjuvant chemotherapy decisionsBreast cancer patientsOncotype DXTreatment decisionsCancer patientsChemotherapy decisionsHormone receptor-positive breast cancer patientsClinical practiceReceptor-positive breast cancer patientsPositive breast cancer patientsOncotype DX useUnited States guidelinesProfiling testsEligible womenSurgical oncologistsCancer careClinical guidelinesModifiable barriersOncologistsMulti-level factorsPatientsThematic saturationPhone interviewsIntermediate scoresQualitative study
2006
Comparison of Conflict of Interest Policies and Reported Practices in Academic Medical Centers in the United States
DINAN MA, WEINFURT KP, FRIEDMAN JY, ALLSBROOK JS, GOTTLIEB J, SCHULMAN KA, HALL MA, DHILLON JK, SUGARMAN J. Comparison of Conflict of Interest Policies and Reported Practices in Academic Medical Centers in the United States. Accountability In Research 2006, 13: 325-342. PMID: 17849643, PMCID: PMC2474571, DOI: 10.1080/08989620601003414.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAcademic Medical CentersConflict of InterestDisclosureEthics Committees, ResearchHealth PolicyHumansInterviews as TopicUnited StatesConceptsInterest policiesComparison of ConflictUnderstanding of conflictUnited StatesComprehensive policyPotential research participantsInterest CommitteePolicyResearch participantsConflictConflicts of interestInstitutionsDisclosure of conflictsInstitutional review boardMost institutionsOfficialsInterestStatePracticeCommitteeDisclosureReview boardMembersConsiderable differencesReportingDisclosing Conflicts of Interest in Clinical Research: Views of Institutional Review Boards, Conflict of Interest Committees, and Investigators
Weinfurt KP, Friedman JY, Dinan MA, Allsbrook JS, Hall MA, Dhillon JK, Sugarman J. Disclosing Conflicts of Interest in Clinical Research: Views of Institutional Review Boards, Conflict of Interest Committees, and Investigators. The Journal Of Law, Medicine & Ethics 2006, 34: 581-591. PMID: 17144182, PMCID: PMC1850937, DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2006.00072.x.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAttitude of Health PersonnelBiomedical ResearchCommunication BarriersConflict of InterestDecision MakingDisclosureEthics Committees, ResearchHuman ExperimentationHumansInformed ConsentInterviews as TopicLiability, LegalOrganizational PolicyResearch SubjectsResearch Support as TopicTrustUnited StatesConceptsFinancial interestsConflicts of interestPotential research participantsInstitutional review board chairsInvestigators' financial interestsInterests of participantsResearch participantsBenefits of disclosureLegal liabilityInterest CommitteeResearch institutionsDisclosureConsent processConflictBoard chairsGeneral agreementInstitutionsDecisionsInterestLiabilityRightsGeneral attitudesRationaleReview boardCircumstances