2022
The association of marital/partner status with patient-reported health outcomes following acute myocardial infarction or stroke: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
Zhu C, Tran P, Leifheit E, Spatz E, Dreyer R, Nyhan K, Wang S, Goldstein L, Lichtman J. The association of marital/partner status with patient-reported health outcomes following acute myocardial infarction or stroke: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS ONE 2022, 17: e0267771. PMID: 36378664, PMCID: PMC9665376, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267771.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPatient-reported outcome measuresAcute myocardial infarctionMarital/partner statusPartner statusMyocardial infarctionHealth outcomesPatient-reported health outcomesPROSPERO registration numberRisk of biasPatient-centered factorsPeer-reviewed journalsPrimary outcomeSubgroup analysisThird reviewerOutcome measuresRegistration numberLower mortalitySystematic reviewEthics approvalStrokePartner supportMale participantsInfarctionFull textOutcomes
2015
2014 ACC/AHA Key Data Elements and Definitions for Cardiovascular Endpoint Events in Clinical Trials A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Data Standards (Writing Committee to Develop Cardiovascular Endpoints Data Standards)
Hicks K, Tcheng J, Bozkurt B, Chaitman B, Cutlip D, Farb A, Fonarow G, Jacobs J, Jaff M, Lichtman J, Limacher M, Mahaffey K, Mehran R, Nissen S, Smith E, Targum S. 2014 ACC/AHA Key Data Elements and Definitions for Cardiovascular Endpoint Events in Clinical Trials A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Data Standards (Writing Committee to Develop Cardiovascular Endpoints Data Standards). Journal Of Nuclear Cardiology 2015, 22: 1041-1144. PMID: 26204990, DOI: 10.1007/s12350-015-0209-1.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAmerican Heart AssociationCardiologyCardiovascular DiseasesClinical Trials as TopicCommon Data ElementsConfidentialityDatabases, FactualEndpoint DeterminationHealth Insurance Portability and Accountability ActHumansQuality Assurance, Health CareQuality of Health CareReproducibility of ResultsResearch DesignSocieties, MedicalTerminology as TopicTranslational Research, BiomedicalTreatment OutcomeUnited States
1996
The NIMH Methods for the Epidemiology of Child and Adolescent Mental Disorders (MECA) Study: Background and Methodology
LAHEY B, FLAGG E, BIRD H, SCHWAB-STONE M, CANINO G, DULCAN M, LEAF P, DAVIES M, BROGAN D, BOURDON K, HORWITZ S, RUBIO-STIPEC M, FREEMAN D, LICHTMAN J, SHAFFER D, GOODMAN S, NARROW W, WEISSMAN M, KANDEL D, JENSEN P, RICHTERS J, REGIER D. The NIMH Methods for the Epidemiology of Child and Adolescent Mental Disorders (MECA) Study: Background and Methodology. Journal Of The American Academy Of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 1996, 35: 855-864. PMID: 8768345, DOI: 10.1097/00004583-199607000-00011.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPopulation-based sampleService utilizationResponse rateAdolescent Mental Disorders (MECA) StudyMental disordersMental health service useNIMH Diagnostic Interview ScheduleChildren Version 2.3Epidemiology of ChildHealth service useBetter response rateDiagnostic Interview ScheduleMental Disorders StudyLarge-scale epidemiological surveysYears of ageProbability household sampleAdult caretakersNIMH MethodsRisk factorsFunctional impairmentLay interviewersComputer-assisted versionService useEpidemiological surveyDisorders Study