Large‐scale analysis of structural brain asymmetries during neurodevelopment: Associations with age and sex in 4265 children and adolescents
Kurth F, Schijven D, van den Heuvel O, Hoogman M, van Rooij D, Stein D, Buitelaar J, Bölte S, Auzias G, Kushki A, Venkatasubramanian G, Rubia K, Bollmann S, Isaksson J, Jaspers‐Fayer F, Marsh R, Batistuzzo M, Arnold P, Bressan R, Stewart S, Gruner P, Sorensen L, Pan P, Silk T, Gur R, Cubillo A, Haavik J, Tuura R, Hartman C, Calvo R, McGrath J, Calderoni S, Jackowski A, Chantiluke K, Satterthwaite T, Busatto G, Nigg J, Gur R, Retico A, Tosetti M, Gallagher L, Szeszko P, Neufeld J, Ortiz A, Ghisleni C, Lazaro L, Hoekstra P, Anagnostou E, Hoekstra L, Simpson B, Plessen J, Deruelle C, Soreni N, James A, Narayanaswamy J, Reddy J, Fitzgerald J, Bellgrove M, Salum G, Janssen J, Muratori F, Vila M, Giral M, Ameis S, Bosco P, Remnélius K, Huyser C, Pariente J, Jalbrzikowski M, Rosa P, O'Hearn K, Ehrlich S, Mollon J, Zugman A, Christakou A, Arango C, Fisher S, Kong X, Franke B, Medland S, Thomopoulos S, Jahanshad N, Glahn D, Thompson P, Francks C, Luders E. Large‐scale analysis of structural brain asymmetries during neurodevelopment: Associations with age and sex in 4265 children and adolescents. Human Brain Mapping 2024, 45: e26754. PMID: 39046031, PMCID: PMC11267452, DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26754.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsBrain asymmetryBrain regionsSex differencesStructural brain asymmetryCerebral asymmetryFindings lack consistencyBrain featuresEffects of ageSamples to dateEffect sizeBrainDifferential effectsAdolescentsAge effectsChildhoodInvestigate associationsSignificant asymmetryAssociated with ageSexMaleFindingsNeurodevelopmentAssociationDifferencesHemisphereBrain‐age prediction: Systematic evaluation of site effects, and sample age range and size
Yu Y, Cui H, Haas S, New F, Sanford N, Yu K, Zhan D, Yang G, Gao J, Wei D, Qiu J, Banaj N, Boomsma D, Breier A, Brodaty H, Buckner R, Buitelaar J, Cannon D, Caseras X, Clark V, Conrod P, Crivello F, Crone E, Dannlowski U, Davey C, de Haan L, de Zubicaray G, Di Giorgio A, Fisch L, Fisher S, Franke B, Glahn D, Grotegerd D, Gruber O, Gur R, Gur R, Hahn T, Harrison B, Hatton S, Hickie I, Pol H, Jamieson A, Jernigan T, Jiang J, Kalnin A, Kang S, Kochan N, Kraus A, Lagopoulos J, Lazaro L, McDonald B, McDonald C, McMahon K, Mwangi B, Piras F, Rodriguez‐Cruces R, Royer J, Sachdev P, Satterthwaite T, Saykin A, Schumann G, Sevaggi P, Smoller J, Soares J, Spalletta G, Tamnes C, Trollor J, Ent D, Vecchio D, Walter H, Wang Y, Weber B, Wen W, Wierenga L, Williams S, Wu M, Zunta‐Soares G, Bernhardt B, Thompson P, Frangou S, Ge R, Group E. Brain‐age prediction: Systematic evaluation of site effects, and sample age range and size. Human Brain Mapping 2024, 45: e26768. PMID: 38949537, PMCID: PMC11215839, DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26768.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsBrain-aging modelBrain-age predictionBrain-ageDiscovery sampleBrain morphometric measuresStructural neuroimaging dataSamples of healthy individualsSample age rangeNeuroimaging metricsNeuroimaging dataHealthy individualsLongitudinal consistencyBrain developmentIndependent samplesAge varianceAge rangeBrainSample sizeAge binsMorphometry dataIndividualsHuman lifespanEmpirical examinationMeaningful measuresFindings8. The Relationship Between Treatment, Symptom Severity, and Brain Connectivity in Bipolar Disorder: An International Study Across 16 Enigma-Bipolar Sites
Nabulsi L, Kang M, Jahanshad N, Haarman B, McDonald C, Stein D, Glahn D, Pomarol-Clotet E, Vieta E, Houenou J, Favre P, Polosan M, Brambilla P, Bellani M, Mitchell P, Dannlowski U, Wessa M, Phillips M, Kircher T, Thompson P, Andreassen O, Ching C, Cannon D, Group E. 8. The Relationship Between Treatment, Symptom Severity, and Brain Connectivity in Bipolar Disorder: An International Study Across 16 Enigma-Bipolar Sites. Biological Psychiatry 2024, 95: s76-s77. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2024.02.186.Peer-Reviewed Original Research