2024
Cost-effectiveness of Enasidenib versus conventional care for older patients with IDH2-mutant refractory/relapsed AML
Alhajahjeh A, Patel K, Shallis R, Podoltsev N, Kewan T, Stempel J, Mendez L, Huntington S, Stahl M, Goshua G, Bewersdorf J, Zeidan A. Cost-effectiveness of Enasidenib versus conventional care for older patients with IDH2-mutant refractory/relapsed AML. Leukemia & Lymphoma 2024, ahead-of-print: 1-9. PMID: 39560957, DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2024.2426073.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConventional care regimensOlder patientsTreatment of older patientsIDH2 inhibitor enasidenibIncremental cost-effectiveness ratioCost-effectiveness ratioProbabilistic sensitivity analysesR/R AMLRefractory/relapsed AMLEvent-freeCost-effective treatmentEnasidenibCare regimensAMLPatientsCost-effectiveIncremental costLife yearsConventional careR/RIncremental effectSurvivalTreatment
2019
Healthcare expenses for treatment of acute myeloid leukemia
Bewersdorf JP, Shallis R, Wang R, Huntington S, Perreault S, Ma X, Zeidan AM. Healthcare expenses for treatment of acute myeloid leukemia. Expert Review Of Hematology 2019, 12: 641-650. PMID: 31159602, DOI: 10.1080/17474086.2019.1627869.Peer-Reviewed Reviews, Practice Guidelines, Standards, and Consensus StatementsConceptsHematopoietic stem cell transplantInsurance statusHealthcare costsTreatment approachesAllogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantAcute myeloid leukemia (AML) treatmentStem cell transplantTreatment costsDirect healthcare costsInpatient treatment costsPatient insurance statusPersonalized treatment approachesAcute myeloid leukemiaMyeloid leukemia treatmentInfluence health policyIntensive chemotherapyOral therapyCell transplantMain cost driversMyeloid leukemiaNovel agentsMedical outcomesLeukemia treatmentHealthcare resourcesAML