Skip to Main Content

3-23-23 Urban Academic Medical Centers and Their Neighbors

March 31, 2023
  • 00:00Okay, hey, everybody.
  • 00:02Hello people on zoom.
  • 00:04Hello people here live.
  • 00:06My name is Anna Reisman.
  • 00:08I am the director of the Program
  • 00:10for Humanities and Medicine and
  • 00:11very glad to be here with you today
  • 00:13for this talk on urban academical
  • 00:15medical centers and their neighbors,
  • 00:18I we have Merlin Chowkunyan,
  • 00:21who is our keynote speaker.
  • 00:23We also have moderator Ben Howell,
  • 00:25and we have three wonderful panelists,
  • 00:27and I will introduce all of them.
  • 00:30Which will take me a few minutes.
  • 00:31So but before I do that,
  • 00:33I just want to say that Ben Howell is
  • 00:36really the person who is behind this,
  • 00:39this whole event.
  • 00:40He will tell you about his
  • 00:43longstanding friendship with Merlin,
  • 00:46although they're just seeing each other
  • 00:47today for the first time in a long time.
  • 00:50But he approached me a couple months
  • 00:52or probably six months ago and
  • 00:54said can we bring Merlin in and.
  • 00:57And can we put together a panel so it all,
  • 00:59it all came together?
  • 01:00Thanks to Ben. So thank you, okay.
  • 01:04So Merlin Chakonyan is the Donald
  • 01:06Jemsen professor of socio Medical
  • 01:08Sciences at Columbia University.
  • 01:11He trained in Columbia for
  • 01:13his bachelor's degree,
  • 01:14received an MPH from University
  • 01:16of Pennsylvania and APHD,
  • 01:18also from University of Pennsylvania.
  • 01:20He's the author of all health politics
  • 01:22is local community battles for
  • 01:24medical care and environmental health.
  • 01:27And is currently working on a book called
  • 01:29Who Dies to be published by Norton,
  • 01:31which reassesses how to think about
  • 01:33the social determinants of health.
  • 01:35He's also the Pi on toxic docs.org,
  • 01:39a NSF funded repository that uses
  • 01:42novel data science methods to make
  • 01:44available millions of once secret
  • 01:46documents on industrial poisons,
  • 01:48and is currently serving on an
  • 01:50expert advisory committee for
  • 01:52the CDC on structural racism.
  • 01:54So welcome,
  • 01:56Merlin.
  • 01:56Moderator Ben Howell is an assistant
  • 01:58professor of medicine and the Yale
  • 02:00School of Medicine with faculty
  • 02:02appointments in the Sesh Center
  • 02:03for Health and Justice in the
  • 02:05program and Addiction Medicine.
  • 02:07He received his medical degree
  • 02:09from the University of California,
  • 02:10San Francisco and an MPH from UC Berkeley.
  • 02:14He completed residency and chief
  • 02:16residency in the Internal Medicine
  • 02:18primary care residency here
  • 02:19at Yale New Haven Hospital,
  • 02:21and following residency,
  • 02:22he completed a health services research
  • 02:24postdoc in the Yale School of Medicines.
  • 02:26National Clinician Scholars Program,
  • 02:28which is well represented here today.
  • 02:31Clinically,
  • 02:31Dr.
  • 02:31Howell practices as a general
  • 02:33internist both in the hospital and in
  • 02:35outpatient settings with a focus on
  • 02:36the treatment of substance use disorders.
  • 02:40His research focus focuses on improving
  • 02:42the health outcomes of individuals,
  • 02:44families and communities impacted by
  • 02:47mass incarceration and our panelists.
  • 02:49So first, I will introduce Catherine Tucker.
  • 02:53Who is the clinical program
  • 02:55director for Heart and Vascular
  • 02:57Center outpatient programs at
  • 02:58Yale New Haven Hospital and the
  • 03:00immediate past president of Southern
  • 03:02Connecticut Black Nurses Association.
  • 03:04She serves as the Yale New Haven
  • 03:06Hospital DEI chair and the
  • 03:08liaison to the Yale New Haven.
  • 03:10Hospital president Doctor Keith Churchwell.
  • 03:12She is currently the chair of the
  • 03:14Target Blood pressure program and
  • 03:16Barbershop initiative in New Haven,
  • 03:17a collaboration with a heart and Vascular
  • 03:20Center and the American Heart Association.
  • 03:22Kathy leads A-Team,
  • 03:23who works to educate communities
  • 03:25affected by various health
  • 03:26conditions like high blood pressure,
  • 03:28diabetes and obesity by providing steps
  • 03:30to improve health and quality of life.
  • 03:33And Kathy received her bachelor's
  • 03:36and master Science of Nursing from
  • 03:38Quinnipiac and her doctorate of Nursing
  • 03:41practice from Sacred Heart University.
  • 03:43She is also a native of West Haven and
  • 03:46currently serving as the Councilwoman
  • 03:47for West Haven's 7th district.
  • 03:49Welcome, Kathy doctor.
  • 03:52Mark Silvestri is chief medical
  • 03:54officer at Cornell Scott Hill Center
  • 03:56Hill Health Center and assistant
  • 03:58clinical professor in the division
  • 04:00of Gynical Logic Specialties.
  • 04:02At the Yale School of Medicine
  • 04:04Department of OBGYN,
  • 04:05doctor Silvestri originally came to
  • 04:07Yale for his residency training and
  • 04:09has stayed in New Haven ever since.
  • 04:11He was also a postdoctoral fellow in the
  • 04:13RWJ Foundation Clinical Scholars Program.
  • 04:16He served as an administrative fellow
  • 04:18with leadership of Yale New Haven
  • 04:20Hospital and then joined the medical
  • 04:22leadership of Cornell Scott Hill,
  • 04:24a large,
  • 04:25multisate,
  • 04:25multispecialty community health
  • 04:27system serving low income individuals
  • 04:29across greater New Haven.
  • 04:31And our final panelist is Virginia spell,
  • 04:35who is currently the acting
  • 04:36President and CEO of the Urban
  • 04:38League of Southern Connecticut.
  • 04:40With more than 25 years
  • 04:42of nonprofit management,
  • 04:43misses spell is focused on economic
  • 04:46empowerment activities for
  • 04:47individuals and families living in
  • 04:49Fairfield and New Haven counties.
  • 04:51Virginia spill is a longtime resident
  • 04:53of New Haven and has worked on the
  • 04:55community level to address racial
  • 04:56inequity and racial segregation and housing,
  • 04:58employment, and healthcare.
  • 04:59She currently serves as president
  • 05:01of the West River Neighborhood
  • 05:04Services Corporation,
  • 05:05shares the West River Neighborhood
  • 05:07Revitalization Zone Committee,
  • 05:08and is the chair of the Board of
  • 05:10Directors for Continuum of Care.
  • 05:12She also serves as a stakeholder in the
  • 05:14Route 34 Corridor redevelopment project.
  • 05:16Sispel is also an active member of the
  • 05:19West River Community Resilience team.
  • 05:21She's also a Co Pi on a multilevel
  • 05:24multicomponent intervention,
  • 05:25true Haven trusted residents and
  • 05:27housing assistance to decrease
  • 05:30violence exposure in New Haven.
  • 05:32Welcome,
  • 05:32Virginia.
  • 05:35And I didn't say welcome Mark after
  • 05:37I read yours, so welcome Mark.
  • 05:41So the way this is going to
  • 05:43work is I'm going to turn things
  • 05:44over to Ben who will moderate.
  • 05:46He will introduce Merlin briefly
  • 05:49and and then we will hear from
  • 05:52Merlin for about 2025 minutes and
  • 05:53then our panelists will come up and
  • 05:55Ben will moderate the discussion.
  • 05:57We have a SL available for those
  • 05:59people who need interpretation
  • 06:01and closed captioning as well.
  • 06:03And we should have plenty of time
  • 06:06for your questions and comments.
  • 06:08After we are done,
  • 06:09so welcome everybody.
  • 06:10Thank you for being here
  • 06:16and I will keep my comments brief and so we
  • 06:18can get to the the content of the evening.
  • 06:20But as and I said I'm Ben Howell,
  • 06:21I'm very excited that we were able to
  • 06:24invite Merlin here to give his talk.
  • 06:27As Anna hinted, when Merlin and I went
  • 06:29to to college together at at Columbia,
  • 06:31I should include that in my bio to to
  • 06:32make sure there's actually a couple
  • 06:34Columbia lions here in the audience.
  • 06:36So we are well represented.
  • 06:39We were both DJ's at the college radio
  • 06:41station so there's a relationship that is
  • 06:44spanned over over 20 years, but no one.
  • 06:47Merlin published his book All
  • 06:49Health Politics is local.
  • 06:50I picked it up and a lot of the stories.
  • 06:53Really resonated with it.
  • 06:55My experience here in New Haven and
  • 06:58with the role Yale New Haven has
  • 07:00in the community here in probably
  • 07:02many of the the tensions that have
  • 07:04between the Community and the academic
  • 07:06medical senator over the years,
  • 07:08it seemed like a fertile opportunity
  • 07:11to prompt a discussion for us today.
  • 07:14So I'm really glad that we were able to
  • 07:15get great panelists who represent many,
  • 07:17many years.
  • 07:18Of of work and and living here
  • 07:20in the community of New Haven to
  • 07:23help foster this discussion.
  • 07:24Without further ado,
  • 07:26I will see the podium to Merlin.
  • 07:38Hi everyone, it's great to be here.
  • 07:40I actually did a lot of research
  • 07:42at Yale at the Sterling Library.
  • 07:45I don't know where it is in
  • 07:46relation to where we are,
  • 07:47but I did a lot of research there and.
  • 07:51I haven't been back to
  • 07:51campus in a while though,
  • 07:52so it's great to be here.
  • 07:55I first want to say I'm just very
  • 07:57appreciative of a lot of the labor that
  • 07:59it takes to put on stuff like this.
  • 08:01So I want to thank you again,
  • 08:03Anna for running the series,
  • 08:05Karen Cole back there for doing
  • 08:07a lot of love behind the scenes
  • 08:09scheduling and logistics,
  • 08:10and of course Ben,
  • 08:11the moderator and as he mentioned,
  • 08:13occasional collaborator and as you also
  • 08:16mentioned a guy I've known for 15 plus years.
  • 08:20You probably don't remember this.
  • 08:21In fact,
  • 08:22I'm 100% certain you don't remember this.
  • 08:24But you remember this part.
  • 08:25So after college you worked for
  • 08:28this dear and departed video
  • 08:31store called Kim's Mondo Video.
  • 08:33Other than days when people still
  • 08:37rented DVD's and videos and stuff.
  • 08:38And I remember one time,
  • 08:40so I was still a little younger than that.
  • 08:42I was still in college.
  • 08:42I remember one time I really
  • 08:45wanted to rent Titanic.
  • 08:46Because I like Titanic,
  • 08:47I sucker for romance and the
  • 08:49kinds of emotions it starts out
  • 08:51I really want to rent Titanic.
  • 08:53And Ben was at the desk and you know,
  • 08:56I knew he was a man of avant-garde,
  • 08:59musical and aesthetic taste.
  • 09:01So I really worried that he would
  • 09:03make fun of me for renting Titanic.
  • 09:05And so I actually thought about
  • 09:07returning the movie on the shelf
  • 09:09and coming back later time.
  • 09:11But I decided not to do it,
  • 09:12just went rented it and Ben
  • 09:14did not make fun of me.
  • 09:16Because he's a stand up great guy,
  • 09:19and he still is, I'm glad to know.
  • 09:23I'm also very humbled to be
  • 09:25present with my Co panelists.
  • 09:27I actually don't know a lot
  • 09:29about New Haven history.
  • 09:30One of the arguments of my book
  • 09:32is that it's very important to
  • 09:35learn about us locally specific
  • 09:37characteristics of very specific places.
  • 09:39And so I only know about New
  • 09:41Haven in the broadest sketches.
  • 09:43And so figuring out how the academic
  • 09:45Medical Center as an institution has fun,
  • 09:48how it's functioned here
  • 09:49for better and for worse,
  • 09:51is something I'm very much looking
  • 09:54forward to dialoguing with you 3 today.
  • 09:57So I'm very honored to be speaking with you.
  • 10:01But Ben and mentioned that I've written
  • 10:03this book and so I'll sketch out in 20
  • 10:05minutes or so some of the things in
  • 10:06this book that pertain to this larger
  • 10:08conversation we're going to have today.
  • 10:11Now this sounds like very crass marketing
  • 10:14on one level and it certainly is,
  • 10:17but on another level it isn't.
  • 10:19I always say whenever I talk about this
  • 10:22book that all the proceeds of this book,
  • 10:24whether they're from book purchases
  • 10:26or from talks I give about it.
  • 10:29They go to my friend and comrade
  • 10:32Sarah Nelson's labor union.
  • 10:34President Nelson leads the
  • 10:37Association for Flight attendants.
  • 10:39This is the flight attendants union,
  • 10:42and specifically my proceeds go to
  • 10:44a Union Relief Fund that it runs
  • 10:47for flight attendants who have been
  • 10:49displaced by extreme weather events,
  • 10:51many of which occur near airline hubs
  • 10:54where a lot of flight attendants live.
  • 10:57President Nelson is somebody who has
  • 11:00been fighting for a vision of Labor
  • 11:02organizing that sticks up for workers
  • 11:04and better wages and contracts,
  • 11:07of course,
  • 11:07but it also focuses also on the
  • 11:10larger communities and societies
  • 11:12those workers live in.
  • 11:14And that also includes sticking
  • 11:16up for people.
  • 11:17That is most of us who are not
  • 11:20in unions as well.
  • 11:21And it's really a model of,
  • 11:22I think, ambitious,
  • 11:24crosscutting political organizing
  • 11:26that we really need right now.
  • 11:28So I like to just mention President
  • 11:31Nelson at the start of every talk,
  • 11:33all right?
  • 11:34Now,
  • 11:34some of you might sense this title
  • 11:37is actually a shameless rip off of
  • 11:40former House Speaker Tip O'Neill and
  • 11:43his famous quip that all politics is local.
  • 11:46So if you're around in the 1980s,
  • 11:49you know that Tip O'Neill was kind
  • 11:51of the Nancy Pelosi of his time.
  • 11:54He was also a very astute analyst
  • 11:57of American politics,
  • 11:58and when I was struggling with
  • 12:00how to mold some of my material,
  • 12:02I thought about O'Neill and something
  • 12:04just really clicked by his famous line,
  • 12:07all politics is local.
  • 12:10O'Neill meant that the big swings
  • 12:13in American life,
  • 12:14whether it's changes in views
  • 12:16on civil rights.
  • 12:18Voter and political party realignments,
  • 12:20even stuff like opposition to abortion,
  • 12:23all those things.
  • 12:24They don't fundamentally start with
  • 12:26the Federal Congress or the Federal
  • 12:29Supreme Court or national elections.
  • 12:31They happen rather at the
  • 12:33block and neighborhood level,
  • 12:35and then they tend to bubble up.
  • 12:37So if you really want to
  • 12:39understand what's going on
  • 12:40politically, you shouldn't just
  • 12:41be looking at the national level,
  • 12:43however important it is.
  • 12:45You need to also zoom in and get granular.
  • 12:49And so I took O'neal's insight
  • 12:51and I slapped one word on it and
  • 12:53I had a book title and framework.
  • 12:56Now, his insight struck me as making
  • 12:58a lot of particular sense for health.
  • 13:00So most public health research
  • 13:02of the kind that I do,
  • 13:04and my colleagues as well,
  • 13:05we prize this thing called generalizability.
  • 13:09What we want to do is generate principles
  • 13:12and elucidate causal relationships that
  • 13:14are as universally applicable as possible.
  • 13:18And so in public health work,
  • 13:19you'll often get findings that say,
  • 13:21X or Y variable affects Z health outcome.
  • 13:25That's.
  • 13:26Extremely useful information,
  • 13:28for sure.
  • 13:29But that quest for generalizability
  • 13:32can also sometimes bleed out the local
  • 13:35and specific context in which the
  • 13:38people being studied are embedded.
  • 13:41The people of New York, of Los Angeles,
  • 13:44of Rochester, of Cleveland, and of New Haven.
  • 13:48And yet that contextual stuff, I think,
  • 13:51and Tip O'Neill certainly thought.
  • 13:54Was and is hugely important.
  • 13:57They're just often isn't a strong
  • 13:59sense of specific setting or a sense
  • 14:01of specific place in a lot of health
  • 14:04policy discussion and public health work.
  • 14:07And so I really wanted to restore
  • 14:09that element here.
  • 14:10I wanted to reinject local social topography.
  • 14:14I want you, in other words,
  • 14:16to see health policy not just as
  • 14:20this unmoored statistical aggregate.
  • 14:22Or just a national story like this,
  • 14:24but I also want you to look at it like that.
  • 14:29Okay.
  • 14:29So I'm going to proceed now to three
  • 14:32anchoring themes that I think will
  • 14:34help us understand this historical
  • 14:36role of the academic Medical Center in
  • 14:39urban areas. And these are the themes.
  • 14:41The first is affiliation or how
  • 14:45academic medical centers increasingly
  • 14:47become bound up with hospitals.
  • 14:49And they're almost kind of unavoidable
  • 14:51if you're in a city like this one
  • 14:53or New York or Los Angeles or,
  • 14:55you know, name your city.
  • 14:57How did this affiliation process between
  • 15:00academic medical centers and medical
  • 15:02institutions like hospitals occur?
  • 15:05Affiliation the second is community
  • 15:07or how in the face of an institution
  • 15:11like the Academic Medical Center?
  • 15:13Academic medical centers have
  • 15:15sometimes sought to bolster and
  • 15:18include nonprofessional non physician
  • 15:20voices of those who live around them,
  • 15:23the community voice community,
  • 15:25and the third is borders.
  • 15:28So this is about the spoken but also
  • 15:32sometimes unspoken boundaries that
  • 15:34divide academic medical centers
  • 15:36and those who live by them.
  • 15:39And how that very tense and taught
  • 15:42relationship has been negotiated over time.
  • 15:45Now,
  • 15:46before I head into the cases,
  • 15:47I do want to say that there is sometimes
  • 15:50a danger of drawing too tidy and neat
  • 15:53of a parallel to a historical event.
  • 15:56So a lot of the stories I'm
  • 15:57going to tell you may remind you
  • 15:59of something in the present,
  • 16:01and I think that's useful.
  • 16:02But I also think it's part of our goal.
  • 16:04And This is why I'm really
  • 16:05looking forward to our
  • 16:06discussion. It's part of our goal also to
  • 16:09figure out what's different and dare I say,
  • 16:11also what has perhaps improved in the 40
  • 16:15years hence stories I'm going to tell
  • 16:17are all kind of in the 1960s and 1970s.
  • 16:21All right. So with that note,
  • 16:22let me start first with
  • 16:24affiliation in New York City,
  • 16:26where I just came from last night.
  • 16:28So I want to take you back to 1961.
  • 16:31I want you to just imagine you're
  • 16:33regularly reading like the metro
  • 16:35section of some New York City paper.
  • 16:37So New York at the time and still
  • 16:39now actually has the largest network
  • 16:42of public hospitals in the country.
  • 16:44Then it was around 20 hospitals,
  • 16:46now it's about a dozen or so.
  • 16:48But they were pretty beleaguered
  • 16:50by the 1960s.
  • 16:51And so if you were reading your
  • 16:53newspaper on kind of a daily basis,
  • 16:55you would encounter these hospital
  • 16:56horror stories, dilapidated buildings
  • 16:58that were falling apart,
  • 17:01trouble staffing hospitals,
  • 17:03difficulty attracting residents,
  • 17:05you name it.
  • 17:06This was a kind of a regular story
  • 17:08in the late 1950s, early 1960s,
  • 17:10about hospitals in New York City.
  • 17:13And so the city did.
  • 17:14What cities normally do
  • 17:15and a thing like this,
  • 17:16they convened a crisis panel and they
  • 17:18said what are we going to do about this?
  • 17:20And their solution to this was
  • 17:22a kind of shock therapy.
  • 17:24What they were going to do was they were
  • 17:26going to take all of these public hospitals,
  • 17:28almost all of which were purely public,
  • 17:31city run, government run,
  • 17:33government funded institutions and
  • 17:35they were going to affiliate them
  • 17:38with an academic Medical Center.
  • 17:40The Columbia's, the Cornell's,
  • 17:42the Mount Sinai's,
  • 17:44the Montefiore's,
  • 17:45you know, you name it.
  • 17:46So it's essentially a subcontracting
  • 17:49relationship whereby the academic
  • 17:51Medical Center would get paid by
  • 17:54the city to oversee everything from
  • 17:57residency programs to staffing decisions
  • 17:59to even infrastructural upkeep of
  • 18:02buildings and stuff like that.
  • 18:04And you see from this list here,
  • 18:05this is from 1965,
  • 18:07pretty much all of the public
  • 18:09hospitals within a few years and all
  • 18:12the fancy institutions got affiliated
  • 18:14and coupled with one another.
  • 18:17There's no need to read all of
  • 18:18these individually,
  • 18:19but the list just kind of conveys
  • 18:22just how rapid and comprehensive
  • 18:24affiliation was in New York.
  • 18:27Now, as you can imagine,
  • 18:28this probably did not sit well.
  • 18:30This did not sit well with the
  • 18:33previously autonomous public hospitals
  • 18:35who really saw this as an incursion,
  • 18:38a disruption of their autonomy on
  • 18:41their longstanding ties that they had
  • 18:44developed with their communities.
  • 18:46So just to take one example,
  • 18:48at City Hospital in Elmhurst in Queens.
  • 18:51A group of advocates warned quote
  • 18:54your family doctor can no longer
  • 18:56be connected with your hospital.
  • 18:58Your doctor may not be able to continue
  • 19:01to maintain high standards of excellence.
  • 19:04The kind of implication here being
  • 19:06that Mount Sinai was going to come
  • 19:08in and disrupt a number of people's
  • 19:10patient doctor relationships,
  • 19:12affiliations in many people's eyes
  • 19:15also were really about something
  • 19:17else. So just to continue
  • 19:19reading off of that pamphlet.
  • 19:20The conversion of public hospitals to
  • 19:23affiliated facilities would result in,
  • 19:25quote, a vast laboratory stressing
  • 19:28research and teaching with its ward
  • 19:32patients or and without influence
  • 19:34serving as potential Guinea pigs.
  • 19:37These were real fears.
  • 19:38And I'm just sticking with this hospital
  • 19:41in Queens just a little bit more.
  • 19:43The County Physicians Guild also weighed in,
  • 19:46and they characterized affiliation as,
  • 19:48quote, forced absolutism.
  • 19:50So those were all the claims about
  • 19:54the possible horrors of affiliation,
  • 19:58and some of them became true.
  • 20:01So throughout the mid 1960s,
  • 20:02we kept reading that newspaper.
  • 20:04You would see that the newspaper started
  • 20:07moving from covering the bad state of
  • 20:10hospitals just in general to scandals
  • 20:12around this affiliation program.
  • 20:15It turned out that many of these
  • 20:17academic medical centers were
  • 20:19pocketing the government money and
  • 20:21actually using it for other purposes
  • 20:24besides running the public hospital.
  • 20:26And even more scandalous,
  • 20:28they were moving their least
  • 20:30renumerative revenue generating patients,
  • 20:32the ones that weren't making
  • 20:34them a lot of money from bills,
  • 20:35they were kind of moving them
  • 20:37into the public hospital.
  • 20:38So this is basically what
  • 20:40we now call patient dumping.
  • 20:42So the critique of affiliation
  • 20:45starts to mount by 1968.
  • 20:47There's one radical health advocacy
  • 20:50organization that characterizes the
  • 20:53affiliation program as exploitative and
  • 20:56metaphorically it labels it a health empire.
  • 21:00So the public hospitals,
  • 21:01which are often utilized by poor
  • 21:03patients of color, they are the colonies,
  • 21:06and the private academic medical
  • 21:08centers are the leeches,
  • 21:10the colonizers.
  • 21:10And this analysis was actually later
  • 21:13expanded into a book that was published by
  • 21:16Random House called American Health Empire.
  • 21:19This was coedited by a health activist
  • 21:23and writer at the time of someone
  • 21:26by the name of Barbara Ahrenright,
  • 21:29who plunged later into obscurity.
  • 21:32So by the 1960s,
  • 21:34with all of this, you know,
  • 21:35this kind of mounting fatigue,
  • 21:37newspaper exposes, etcetera,
  • 21:38it was actually not very clear at all if
  • 21:43affiliation would actually even survive.
  • 21:45But affiliation,
  • 21:46as we know, did survive,
  • 21:48very much so.
  • 21:49And that was because of a very new
  • 21:52fiscal context that emerged in the mid
  • 21:541970s rather suddenly when the entire
  • 21:58country found itself mired in recession.
  • 22:01And when cities like New York
  • 22:03City were hit especially hard.
  • 22:05So New York City almost famously
  • 22:08defaulted on its debt in 1975.
  • 22:11You see this famous headline
  • 22:12here where the federal government
  • 22:14refused to bail out New York City.
  • 22:17And that plunges New York City
  • 22:19into a very new and very jarring.
  • 22:22Fiscal climate,
  • 22:23kind of an austerity climate
  • 22:25where budgets get very, very,
  • 22:26very tight,
  • 22:27budgets get slashed,
  • 22:29and it was really hard for
  • 22:31public hospitals to get along by
  • 22:33themselves in a selfsufficient,
  • 22:35independent manner with a city
  • 22:37that is functioning under this
  • 22:40kind of austerity sort of climate.
  • 22:43Public hospitals, in short,
  • 22:44were no longer in a fiscal position
  • 22:47to sustain themselves without the
  • 22:50resources that an affiliation provided.
  • 22:53And so the fiscal climate of the
  • 22:551970s, I think, is the central explanation
  • 22:58for the ubiquity of affiliation today,
  • 23:01and also the structural dependence
  • 23:04that most public hospitals have
  • 23:06in some way or the other on
  • 23:09academic medical centers in cities.
  • 23:11Definitely in New York,
  • 23:12but also other cities as well.
  • 23:15So, you know, whereas it looked rather
  • 23:18uncertain in 1968 or 1969 about
  • 23:21whether affiliation would survive,
  • 23:23by the late 1970s,
  • 23:25it's actually very hard to see any
  • 23:28other means of sustaining public
  • 23:30hospitals besides affiliation.
  • 23:32And I still think that's the case today.
  • 23:36There are very few health services
  • 23:38now that are purely public that don't
  • 23:40have some kind of contact with either
  • 23:43an academic Medical Center or some
  • 23:45kind of large healthcare network.
  • 23:46And whether that's a good thing
  • 23:48or a bad thing,
  • 23:49I think is something for us to discuss now.
  • 23:53I actually happen to think,
  • 23:54and I was a little surprised
  • 23:55to kind of conclude this,
  • 23:57that I actually think New York City
  • 23:59affiliation today works pretty well.
  • 24:01There are more accountability mechanisms,
  • 24:04more audits.
  • 24:05Etcetera.
  • 24:05To ensure that the sort of abuses I talk
  • 24:09about don't don't happen at least as much.
  • 24:12But we can talk about whether or not I'm
  • 24:14being a little too optimistic there.
  • 24:16Okay, let me move on to that
  • 24:19second theme of community.
  • 24:21I'm just going to admit I made a mistake.
  • 24:22This should be in big letters.
  • 24:23It should say community, but it doesn't.
  • 24:26But in the 1960,
  • 24:28there was this new agency called OEO.
  • 24:31You know,
  • 24:32Oreo without an ROEO,
  • 24:34it's called the Office of Economic
  • 24:36Opportunity during the Lyndon
  • 24:38Johnson administration doled out
  • 24:39tons of money to these really
  • 24:41interesting Community level projects.
  • 24:43It was actually run by Sergeant Shriver,
  • 24:46the newscaster Maria Shriver's dad,
  • 24:50and it had this rule called
  • 24:53maximum feasible participation.
  • 24:55So this basically was a mandate that said
  • 24:58any community project that gets money.
  • 25:01From these new OEO programs,
  • 25:03if you get money,
  • 25:05you have to have nonprofessional
  • 25:07lay participation in how it's run,
  • 25:10and usually this would be in the
  • 25:12form of kind of a lay Community
  • 25:14Board of some sort.
  • 25:16But the big question, of course,
  • 25:17is how much power do these lay
  • 25:21boards really have?
  • 25:22Now,
  • 25:23what does maximum feasible
  • 25:25participation actually mean?
  • 25:27This is actually the exact words
  • 25:29that were these are the exact words
  • 25:31that were in the actual legislation.
  • 25:33So in this book to explore this,
  • 25:36I follow the trajectory of this
  • 25:38community Health Center in the Watts
  • 25:40neighborhood of South Central Los Angeles.
  • 25:43Where most of Los Angeles's black
  • 25:45population lived in the 1960s because
  • 25:48of pervasive residential segregation
  • 25:50and racism in the housing market,
  • 25:52so the red shades here indicate that 90%
  • 25:56or more of those census tracts are black,
  • 26:00demographically.
  • 26:01So this new watts center opens
  • 26:04up here in 1967.
  • 26:06That's a couple years,
  • 26:07two years after the Watts riot of 1965.
  • 26:11And it's a direct response to
  • 26:14the huge resource deprivation
  • 26:16that that Riot had exposed.
  • 26:19And what this new center did
  • 26:21was actually pretty ambitious.
  • 26:22It was like $2,000,000 in $2,000,000 worth of
  • 26:27money at at that level of currency valuation.
  • 26:31It offered inpatient and outpatient services,
  • 26:35and it opened to a lot of fanfare.
  • 26:39But soon conflicts over governance
  • 26:41overshadowed this kind of celebratory
  • 26:44initial mood. One reason was
  • 26:47that an academic Medical Center,
  • 26:50the University of Southern California,
  • 26:52the University of Southern California,
  • 26:54or USC, was actually the one that was going
  • 26:57to receive the OEO federal funds at the top,
  • 27:01at the top for overseeing the project.
  • 27:03So another thing about OEO was
  • 27:05you usually had to funnel the
  • 27:07money through some kind of inter.
  • 27:09Intermediary middleman before it
  • 27:10got down to the actual project,
  • 27:13the Watts Health Center.
  • 27:15So the intermediary here was USC.
  • 27:18That produces no small amount of
  • 27:22tension because in the past couple of
  • 27:25decades USC have been rapidly expanding
  • 27:27several miles directly north of Watts
  • 27:30and bulldozing all kinds of houses,
  • 27:33actual housing that stood in its way.
  • 27:37There was this community organizer
  • 27:39that I studied who was hired
  • 27:41for this Watts health project.
  • 27:42His name was Jim Bates,
  • 27:44and for Jim Bates,
  • 27:47USC's involvement aroused very
  • 27:49justifiable suspicion.
  • 27:51Jim Bates was a really fascinating guy.
  • 27:53He was a black alumnus of USC.
  • 27:55He had played football there a little bit,
  • 27:57and then he went into community
  • 27:59organizing and got hired by this project.
  • 28:02And he wrote this memo where he
  • 28:04summarized the sentiments and attitudes
  • 28:07of watts residents rather bluntly,
  • 28:09as follows.
  • 28:10Quote we just don't want the
  • 28:12University of Southern California
  • 28:15in Watts under any circumstances.
  • 28:18close quote,
  • 28:20USC felt that suspicion right away.
  • 28:23All three of the university's hand
  • 28:25chosen administrators for this
  • 28:27Watts Health Center were white.
  • 28:29With the latter 2 assuming daytoday
  • 28:31supervisor roles and you see
  • 28:33them up there on the board chart.
  • 28:35The other issue, though,
  • 28:37wasn't just white administrators
  • 28:39versus the mostly black neighborhood.
  • 28:42And as the center's paid organizer,
  • 28:44this guy, Jim Bates,
  • 28:45also had a really thankless task.
  • 28:48He had to form a mandated community
  • 28:50Health Council.
  • 28:51And it's highlighted over there
  • 28:52and it says at the very top,
  • 28:54neighborhood representation and cooperation.
  • 28:56And he had to kind of build
  • 28:59something to maximize that.
  • 29:01But he really struggled from
  • 29:02the outset to put it together.
  • 29:05Now, Watts was mostly black,
  • 29:07but that racial composition actually
  • 29:09masked a lot of difference within watts.
  • 29:13And this is actually a thing
  • 29:14that I think isn't talked enough
  • 29:16about both then and today.
  • 29:18When we say Community,
  • 29:19what do we mean by that?
  • 29:21You know,
  • 29:22what are the community's boundaries?
  • 29:23Who is in it? Who is not in it?
  • 29:25When we say Latinx Community,
  • 29:27Asian community, black community,
  • 29:29the community, you know who is in it.
  • 29:31And when it comes to representation
  • 29:33on a body like a community.
  • 29:35The Navy Board who actually
  • 29:36gets to sit on that body.
  • 29:38And so that's what Bates was struggling
  • 29:40with when he had to inform this,
  • 29:42this Community Health Council.
  • 29:44And what he ends up doing
  • 29:46is he creates this really blunt tool.
  • 29:48He's really exasperated over how to do this,
  • 29:50but he creates this thing called
  • 29:53a membership determining funnel.
  • 29:55And it's basically a formula.
  • 29:56It scores perspective Council
  • 29:58members responses and interviews,
  • 30:01and then he whittles them down
  • 30:02by where they lived in watts,
  • 30:04their age, their gender,
  • 30:06how much education they had, etcetera.
  • 30:08And he thought this was basically a crude
  • 30:11but kind of ultimately necessary step
  • 30:14towards creating an actual board that
  • 30:16was at least somewhat representative.
  • 30:19And I always take a look at this
  • 30:21membership determining funnel thing,
  • 30:23because it reminds me,
  • 30:24actually of how hard it is to
  • 30:27define and operationalize and
  • 30:29implement something like community
  • 30:31participation in real world practice.
  • 30:33Here he was kind of trying to
  • 30:35create as much variation and
  • 30:38representativeness as possible.
  • 30:40And to Bates and the center's credit.
  • 30:43After these growing pains,
  • 30:44this watts Health Center actually saw
  • 30:47many decades of considerable success,
  • 30:49and it also started to function
  • 30:53eventually autonomously after USC
  • 30:55phased itself out from the project,
  • 30:57and it still exists today the center.
  • 31:00I think one of the reasons for
  • 31:02this was that there was this other
  • 31:05fellow black physician named Rodney
  • 31:07Powell who replaced some of those
  • 31:09white USC physicians on the project.
  • 31:12And he was somebody who I think
  • 31:15really understood very sensitively
  • 31:17the fraught dynamics and basically
  • 31:19work to clarify how much power this
  • 31:22Community council had and he basically
  • 31:25proposed that it operate as a board of
  • 31:27directors rather than get involved in
  • 31:29every kind of little micro level decision.
  • 31:32And I've always thought that Rodney
  • 31:34Powell and that other fellow I
  • 31:36was talking to about Jim Bates,
  • 31:38they really exemplify too,
  • 31:40just how important good interpersonal
  • 31:43skills are when actually enacting
  • 31:45something like community health or
  • 31:47better relations between academic medical
  • 31:50centers and projects like this one,
  • 31:52and then the community at large.
  • 31:54All right, my last case is about borders.
  • 31:59So just imagine a black background
  • 32:01and then it says borders.
  • 32:03But I'll talk, you know,
  • 32:05borders brings me to one of the
  • 32:08less uplifting stories in my book.
  • 32:10So I studied this area on the east
  • 32:13side of Cleveland, which, like Watts,
  • 32:16was also profoundly segregated and
  • 32:19under resourced in the 1950s and 1960s.
  • 32:22And I focused in particular
  • 32:24on the Cleveland Clinic.
  • 32:26So this is a map here that shows,
  • 32:29yeah,
  • 32:29the map here shows where the Cleveland
  • 32:32Clinic is situated smack dab in the
  • 32:34middle of this East Cleveland section.
  • 32:36Now,
  • 32:37I don't think I need to tell anybody here
  • 32:40at a medical school that the Cleveland
  • 32:42Clinic is not some quaint clinic.
  • 32:45From the 1920s to the 1960s,
  • 32:47the Cleveland Clinic developed
  • 32:49into one of the most prestigious
  • 32:51elite medical centers in the world.
  • 32:542/3 of its clientele came from outside
  • 32:58the county where Cleveland was located.
  • 33:01And yet it was a profound contradiction
  • 33:04because it was located in this
  • 33:07neighborhood whose residents had pretty
  • 33:09much no access to any of its fruits
  • 33:13and. To add insult to injury,
  • 33:16not only did the Cleveland Clinic
  • 33:18not do anything for its low income
  • 33:21African American neighbors,
  • 33:22it also constantly expanded.
  • 33:24So these are two aerial shots that I
  • 33:27wanted to show you of the expansion
  • 33:29over just a couple of decades.
  • 33:31So on the left is the 1930s
  • 33:32and on the right is the 1950s.
  • 33:35And you can see on the left in the 1930s.
  • 33:38There are homes there and then
  • 33:41those homes are gone on the right.
  • 33:44Side note, little side note,
  • 33:46the Cleveland Clinic would actually
  • 33:48not let me publish these in my book.
  • 33:51And so I encourage you to take pictures
  • 33:53of these and post them on Twitter,
  • 33:56Instagram, TikTok, Reddit, Pinterest,
  • 33:58and whatever else kids are using these days.
  • 34:02This here is a map that kind of,
  • 34:05you know, here, a little longer pose.
  • 34:07All right.
  • 34:09This here is a picture of a plan
  • 34:12for a 30 block expansion where the
  • 34:15Cleveland Clinic would have been
  • 34:17the driving force behind this kind
  • 34:20of new science and Medical Center.
  • 34:22But as in Los Angeles,
  • 34:24there was actually a riot in
  • 34:26Cleveland in 1966,
  • 34:28and that dramatically changed everything.
  • 34:31The Cleveland Clinic executives
  • 34:32actually really started to panic.
  • 34:34They worried that people would actually
  • 34:36come and torch the clinic next.
  • 34:39They actually thought about picking up
  • 34:41and just leaving Cleveland entirely.
  • 34:43They pondered over whether or
  • 34:45not they should set up their own
  • 34:48private paramilitary force in case
  • 34:50the National Guard was not enough.
  • 34:52And they wondered,
  • 34:54in their words whether they should start
  • 34:56training what they called squad leaders.
  • 34:59Who would be composed of men with
  • 35:02previous combat experience and whether
  • 35:04or not these men should be issued
  • 35:06what they called ultimate weapons,
  • 35:08which would be include firearms,
  • 35:11pistols and rifles.
  • 35:12For anyone who managed to enter a
  • 35:16clinic building this kind of fear,
  • 35:19the depth of this fear,
  • 35:20a very racialized, very racist fear.
  • 35:24I think really reflected widespread
  • 35:27acknowledgement about medical
  • 35:28exclusion in this neighborhood,
  • 35:30not just among those who were excluded,
  • 35:33but also among the excluders.
  • 35:37And it actually ended up forcing
  • 35:39the clinic to make a concession.
  • 35:41So what it did was it promised it
  • 35:43was going to build a primary care
  • 35:46clinic on this east side of Cleveland.
  • 35:49But the facility actually didn't
  • 35:51get finished until the mid 1970s,
  • 35:53almost a decade later.
  • 35:55And for me,
  • 35:56that clinic was always kind of 1/2 victory.
  • 36:00By the mid 1970s, a lot of the energy,
  • 36:02the political energy that had
  • 36:04been unleashed by the riot kind
  • 36:07of had disappeared.
  • 36:08And so the clinic was actually
  • 36:10back to its old tricks by the
  • 36:121980s and once again expanding.
  • 36:15And when it came to actual resources,
  • 36:18the Cleveland Clinic really kicked
  • 36:19in a pretty modest sum of money.
  • 36:21It was about $200,000 for two years,
  • 36:25but it was actually the county,
  • 36:27the government,
  • 36:28that ended up putting in most of
  • 36:30the work and the money for this.
  • 36:33You know,
  • 36:34often times when an academic
  • 36:35Medical Center is
  • 36:36put on the defensive in a heated moment,
  • 36:38it'll make all these kinds of lofty promises.
  • 36:42But then when the moment is over,
  • 36:44the commitments are often much more muted
  • 36:47and modest than what they initially were.
  • 36:50And so when you look at the picture
  • 36:52of the clinic today, you know,
  • 36:54it may have some more modest
  • 36:56things that it does to reach out
  • 36:58to its neighborhoods, neighbors.
  • 36:59But the question I think still
  • 37:02remains is this still an island
  • 37:05in a sea of deprivation with a
  • 37:08just a few nodes of contact?
  • 37:10I think when many people think of
  • 37:13an elite academic Medical Center
  • 37:16with strained community ties,
  • 37:18they tend to think of stuff like this
  • 37:21stuff similar to what I've recounted
  • 37:24here with the Cleveland Clinic.
  • 37:26Let me close by reflecting in
  • 37:27just my final couple of minutes,
  • 37:29and I'm really looking forward to
  • 37:31talking with everybody on just kind
  • 37:33of what do we take away from this?
  • 37:35Well, first,
  • 37:36the experiences that I've described today.
  • 37:40These kind of three cases,
  • 37:41I think at the very least they did
  • 37:45inaugurate very substantial zeitgeist change.
  • 37:48So today there exists, at least minimally,
  • 37:52some rhetorical commitment on the
  • 37:55part of academic medical centers.
  • 37:57To the residents around them,
  • 37:59though you know how much that
  • 38:02rhetoric actually moves.
  • 38:03Beyond public relations, genuflection,
  • 38:05of course, varies a lot,
  • 38:07and that's something I'm really interested
  • 38:09in getting into in our discussion.
  • 38:11Second, a lot of these programs,
  • 38:14like the Community Health Center in Watts,
  • 38:16which again still exists,
  • 38:17and the ones here in New Haven,
  • 38:20New Haven is a place with,
  • 38:21you know,
  • 38:22some really good community health centers.
  • 38:24They were and are actually very serious
  • 38:27sources of not just medical care,
  • 38:30but also training and jobs for
  • 38:32people who live around them by
  • 38:34virtue of their very existence.
  • 38:36And that's no small feat either.
  • 38:38They are part of a nationwide
  • 38:41investment in longterm infrastructural
  • 38:43improvement to alleviate stark
  • 38:45maldistribution in medical care.
  • 38:48I think we have to acknowledge
  • 38:50and celebrate that third.
  • 38:52I think an unresolved question is how
  • 38:55much academic medical centers ought to
  • 38:58be involved in these Community projects.
  • 39:01So there's a wide spectrum of involvement,
  • 39:04community projects,
  • 39:05health projects that have no academic
  • 39:07medical centers involved with them
  • 39:09and ones that are basically run
  • 39:11by the Academic Medical Center.
  • 39:13And you know, I think instinctively because.
  • 39:17People have heard and maybe seen things
  • 39:20like the Cleveland Clinic's expansion
  • 39:22in the in the mid 20th century.
  • 39:24I think a lot of academic Medical
  • 39:27Center involvement tends to
  • 39:29elicit skepticism initially,
  • 39:31understandably, and often rightfully.
  • 39:33But I wonder if there's a way we can
  • 39:36think about that a bit more rather
  • 39:37than just dismissing it outright.
  • 39:39And then fourth,
  • 39:40I think it's worth probing what community
  • 39:43participation should actually look like.
  • 39:46This is a demand,
  • 39:47both then and now,
  • 39:48that morally,
  • 39:49again,
  • 39:49is very intuitive and very easy to
  • 39:52get behind.
  • 39:53But actually enacting
  • 39:55community participation,
  • 39:56defining what a community is,
  • 39:59and actually acknowledging how much power
  • 40:01that community does or doesn't have,
  • 40:04those are much often harder questions
  • 40:07that are sometimes glossed over.
  • 40:09And then finally,
  • 40:10I think we have to take stock of
  • 40:12a very new landscape that's very
  • 40:14different from the 1960s and 1970s.
  • 40:16So as most of you in the room know on
  • 40:19a health being at a medical school,
  • 40:21Health Sciences campus,
  • 40:23we're seeing a lot of mergers,
  • 40:25acquisitions and consolidations in
  • 40:27the healthcare space.
  • 40:29These guys a couple years ago they tried to
  • 40:31do something together and they ultimately
  • 40:34pulled the plug on their initiative,
  • 40:36but two of them.
  • 40:38Amazon and JPMorgan are actually going in
  • 40:41alone with their own healthcare venture,
  • 40:44and it all makes the the local
  • 40:47community battles around academic
  • 40:48medical centers that I wrote about.
  • 40:51You know about one hospital here,
  • 40:52one controversy there,
  • 40:54one community Health Center there,
  • 40:56even one city.
  • 40:57It all kind of seems a little
  • 41:00quaint relative to the changes that
  • 41:02might be coming on the horizon.
  • 41:05Whatever we think of the
  • 41:07academic Medical Center,
  • 41:08we also may be heading towards a
  • 41:10world where the Academic Medical
  • 41:12Center is actually less central than
  • 41:15it has been in the past half century.
  • 41:17There are a lot of new actors in this space,
  • 41:20and it leaves a lot of questions.
  • 41:22And with that, I'm looking for this panel.
  • 41:24Ben,
  • 41:24should I just sit there and everyone else?
  • 41:26Yeah.
  • 41:31Yeah, actually, I'll ask our three
  • 41:33panelists to come up as well. Dr.
  • 41:35Tucker, Dr. Silvestri and misspell
  • 41:38come up as well.
  • 41:42I'm gonna take down the Basil's picture
  • 41:47to move on.
  • 41:50So we only unfortunately have one microphone.
  • 41:53I obviously have a microphone up here,
  • 41:55so you guys will have to share
  • 41:58the microphone in your comments.
  • 41:59When we the plan will be to have each
  • 42:03of our panelists have 5 to 8 minutes to
  • 42:06discuss some I will prime with a question.
  • 42:08And then you can also reflect on
  • 42:11what you heard from Merlin already.
  • 42:14And after each of the three of you
  • 42:15will potentially have a discussion.
  • 42:16And then really open it up to the
  • 42:19group as well as to people on the chat
  • 42:21if they send in questions as well.
  • 42:25First, I really want to obviously,
  • 42:26Marilyn, you mentioned that New Haven and
  • 42:28the specifics of Yale New Haven are not
  • 42:31something you are intimately aware of.
  • 42:32But rest assured,
  • 42:33many of the things that you discussed
  • 42:36as sort of do sort of permeate the
  • 42:39history of this of our community.
  • 42:41We are a highly segregated community.
  • 42:45We are a majority minority city in a
  • 42:48larger county that is majority white.
  • 42:50Yale Mchaven serves as the Health
  • 42:52Center for for both those community,
  • 42:54both New Haven specifically and
  • 42:56all the the suburbs and and most
  • 42:59of southern Connecticut.
  • 43:00We are sort of a community also
  • 43:02affected by urban renewal and the
  • 43:04deindustrialization of the midcentury.
  • 43:06And so we had many of the issues
  • 43:07that were affected,
  • 43:08Cleveland and Los Angeles as well.
  • 43:12I don't know,
  • 43:13I'm just really excited
  • 43:14about this conversation.
  • 43:15I do want to acknowledge that the
  • 43:18only human does has an obligation to
  • 43:20report their Community health benefit
  • 43:22and they do have a a triaminal report
  • 43:25that they generate every three years.
  • 43:27And you can look it up online and sort
  • 43:29of see how they they report themselves,
  • 43:31what are they doing,
  • 43:32what they are doing for the community.
  • 43:35They also report to the IRS how much
  • 43:37of a community benefit in in monetary.
  • 43:41Sense how much they they give back to me.
  • 43:43I think it's on the order of $500 million,
  • 43:46although almost 400 million of that
  • 43:48is related to under compensated
  • 43:50or uncompensated care that the
  • 43:52hospital provides.
  • 43:52So you can have a question about
  • 43:54does that actually reflect the
  • 43:56community benefit of the hospital.
  • 43:58They're also the second largest employer
  • 44:00in the city after the university.
  • 44:04So with all those things,
  • 44:05I do want to pivot to our discussion,
  • 44:07I want to start with misspell as our.
  • 44:10What's
  • 44:14that? Oh, sorry for the camera.
  • 44:16We got to get okay. We can reflect.
  • 44:18We got mark in the picture now,
  • 44:20so we can start.
  • 44:22So although I do want to say that
  • 44:24obviously I invited the three of you
  • 44:26here because of your respective roles
  • 44:27of Virginia role in the Community,
  • 44:29Kathy, role in the hospital and mark
  • 44:31your role the Community Health Center.
  • 44:33But I want to acknowledge that all the three
  • 44:35of you have many roles that you fulfill.
  • 44:37And also that no person as Merlin
  • 44:38mentioned can sort of speak for
  • 44:41you know all the entity that all,
  • 44:42the whole entity that they are representing.
  • 44:44So with that caveat we will dive in.
  • 44:47So I do want to start with Virginia.
  • 44:50I generally want to hear your thoughts
  • 44:53reflecting on what Merlin said and really.
  • 44:56One question that always comes up
  • 44:57sort of you are a New Haven resident,
  • 44:59you live here in West River.
  • 45:00I'm sure you have gotten
  • 45:01healthcare here at Yelm Haven.
  • 45:02I'm sure your neighbors and your family
  • 45:04members have gotten healthcare at Yelm Haven.
  • 45:06What is the perception of you and your
  • 45:09neighbors of the care that they get
  • 45:11or how responsive the hospital is?
  • 45:13It's the needs of your community.
  • 45:16I mean, we can, we can expand on that.
  • 45:19But Virginia,
  • 45:19if you could,
  • 45:20at least 5 to 8 minutes to discuss that.
  • 45:24So of course no
  • 45:25community is a monolith
  • 45:28and I can't speak for all of the residents
  • 45:32in New Haven or even in West River Dwight,
  • 45:35which is one of 10 communities
  • 45:37in the city of New Haven.
  • 45:39I think we've, we've always had a very
  • 45:43tenuous kind of relationship with with
  • 45:47the hospital and I think at the greatest.
  • 45:53From a high level,
  • 45:54I would assume that most folks
  • 45:56are happy with their healthcare.
  • 45:59I don't think anybody is unhappy
  • 46:02with the service provided by
  • 46:04Yellow Haven Health systems.
  • 46:06There's been some changes with St.
  • 46:08Rachel's campus, which I know we'll
  • 46:10we'll we'll talk a little bit about.
  • 46:11But for the most part,
  • 46:14good care is provided by the health
  • 46:16system in New Haven and I think most.
  • 46:19Residents in the city would agree that
  • 46:21that that we we receive good healthcare.
  • 46:24What about how responsive the the hospital
  • 46:26is to other communities beyond the
  • 46:28individual care that the people receive?
  • 46:34Well, you've really started something. So
  • 46:38how residents in the city think
  • 46:41about healthcare very broadly may
  • 46:44be very different because you have.
  • 46:47Communities that are significantly impacted
  • 46:50by the change that happened with St.
  • 46:52Ray fields, the change that's
  • 46:54happened with you know removing
  • 46:56the primary care service from the
  • 46:58hospital and and sending it to.
  • 47:03So my husband said 150.
  • 47:05I was thinking about the healthcare center,
  • 47:06so Cliff Cornell,
  • 47:08Scott and and Fairhaven Clinic.
  • 47:11So there there is definitely a
  • 47:15strong feeling about whether or not.
  • 47:17Community is represented when
  • 47:19decisions like that are made about
  • 47:22our healthcare and the greater
  • 47:24impact that traveling to long
  • 47:26north or traveling to a healthcare
  • 47:29system outside of the hospital
  • 47:30may have impacted families.
  • 47:33Well, we can fill in some of the
  • 47:35details for folks who don't know what
  • 47:37specifically you're talking about,
  • 47:38but you're referring to two things.
  • 47:40#1, the Yamla Haven is now the only
  • 47:43hospital in in our community where
  • 47:45prior there were two hospitals, St.
  • 47:47Rayfield's, the hospital Saint Rayfield's
  • 47:49and and in Yamla Haven and now they
  • 47:52are due to financial problems frankly
  • 47:53at the hospital Saint Rayfield's.
  • 47:55Yamla Haven purchased St.
  • 47:56Rayfield's and so now there's only
  • 47:58one hospital and two campuses and
  • 48:00there we're still living through
  • 48:02that legacy of that change.
  • 48:03The second one is that when
  • 48:04you don't even bought St.
  • 48:05Rafael's,
  • 48:06they moved some of the primary care
  • 48:08services they provided there to a
  • 48:10different location that instead
  • 48:11of being in the community was
  • 48:13arguably outside of the community.
  • 48:15And that is something again and
  • 48:17actually a good pivot to our
  • 48:19representative from Cornell, Scott.
  • 48:20Some of those primary care service
  • 48:22previously offered by the hospital are
  • 48:24now offered by the Community health centers.
  • 48:26So with that we'll pivot to
  • 48:28doctor Silvestri to Mark so.
  • 48:30Cornell Scott is living the
  • 48:32legacy of the OEO and then those
  • 48:35innovations in the 60s and 70s.
  • 48:38Still the the Community Health
  • 48:40Center movement that started then
  • 48:42and was funded as part of the
  • 48:43Great Society is is is persisting
  • 48:45now as Marilyn mentioned.
  • 48:48So how how is I mean there are and
  • 48:50that you I would love you to expand on
  • 48:52what that means for Cornell. Scott.
  • 48:54As far as their maximum feasible
  • 48:56participation of the community,
  • 48:59how Cornell Scott responds to community
  • 49:01needs and also how they potentially fill
  • 49:03in some of the gaps where potentially
  • 49:05other healthcare systems aren't
  • 49:06providing the care that the community
  • 49:08needs and and can expand on that,
  • 49:11sure. Thanks Merlin for a very
  • 49:15engaging and entertaining also talk.
  • 49:21Sometimes I wish I had lectures
  • 49:22as engaging as you back when I
  • 49:24was in school, but I think so.
  • 49:29It's it's part of the nature and the DNA
  • 49:31of how federally qualified health centers,
  • 49:33or community health centers as
  • 49:34they're colloquially known,
  • 49:36were originally set up and established
  • 49:39and by law are governed that we are
  • 49:44kind of inextricably bound to our.
  • 49:47Community, our Board of directors is
  • 49:50comprised of at least 50% patients
  • 49:54and members of the Community
  • 49:56and that's by by federal law.
  • 49:58But you know,
  • 50:00I think it's probably even more
  • 50:02importantly been part of just
  • 50:04the DNA of who the organizations
  • 50:05are from the very beginning now.
  • 50:07I mean Cornell Scott Hill Health Center,
  • 50:09which was originally Hill Health
  • 50:10Center and then subsequently named
  • 50:12after our founder Cornell Scott,
  • 50:13the Cornell Scott Hill Health Center.
  • 50:16Was originally formed by a partnership
  • 50:20between members of the Hill
  • 50:22community and members of the school.
  • 50:24But the you know that that
  • 50:26it's we're independently,
  • 50:29we're an independent nonprofit
  • 50:31and apparently governed by that
  • 50:32board of Directors that remains
  • 50:34majority community members.
  • 50:35And so I think there are a number
  • 50:37of elements of what we do that
  • 50:39allow us to to remain plugged
  • 50:41in with the Community and to try
  • 50:43to be responsive to those needs.
  • 50:44And it it's tied into just the nature.
  • 50:47I think even of well it starts with
  • 50:49a I think that we have a community
  • 50:52outreach and marketing team and you know,
  • 50:54their job obviously is to let the
  • 50:57Community know about what we're
  • 50:58doing in the services available,
  • 50:59but it's also to get feedback from
  • 51:01the community and bring them to us.
  • 51:02So I mean they're doing obviously
  • 51:04marketing and outreach events,
  • 51:06but they're also doing mobile
  • 51:08vaccination or or health clinics.
  • 51:09And so all the time they're bringing
  • 51:10back feedback to us, you know.
  • 51:12For those of you know Carla Estelle Bragg,
  • 51:14our director mark,
  • 51:15they say it's taking four months to
  • 51:17get a new primary care appointment
  • 51:19that's too long.
  • 51:20What can we do about that,
  • 51:21you know and so we kind of get this
  • 51:24real time ongoing feedback that I
  • 51:26mean we want to be responsive to and
  • 51:27guys what we do then we have medical
  • 51:29services that are in the Community,
  • 51:31not just our mobile health events but
  • 51:32our school based health centers where
  • 51:34we're in you know over a dozen schools
  • 51:35we're interacting with principals,
  • 51:37with superintendents,
  • 51:38with parents and others there.
  • 51:40Our homeless healthcare team that's
  • 51:42in the shelters on the streets,
  • 51:45interacting with harm or dust
  • 51:47reduction task forces,
  • 51:49trying to be responsive to the
  • 51:51needs of particular communities.
  • 51:52So the I think there are a number
  • 51:55of ways that we try to obtain
  • 51:57information and make sure that
  • 51:58we know how the Community is
  • 52:00feeling so we can be responsive.
  • 52:01That's that's why we exist.
  • 52:03If we if we cease to do that,
  • 52:05we sort of lost,
  • 52:07lost our way.
  • 52:09So that to to push us a little
  • 52:11bit on this relationship with
  • 52:12the the Community Health Center,
  • 52:14Cornell Scott and Yell New Haven is kind
  • 52:16of like a triangle the the community,
  • 52:18the hill Cornell Scott and then yell New
  • 52:20Haven Hospital which is down the street.
  • 52:23I'm sure that relationship between
  • 52:24Cornell Scott and the hospital
  • 52:26has evolved over the years.
  • 52:29Can you speak to that a little?
  • 52:30What are some of the tensions that
  • 52:32you guys have when trying to both
  • 52:34obviously serve the the same,
  • 52:35the same community?
  • 52:36What are ways that I can potentially
  • 52:39improve that relationship going forward?
  • 52:42Sure. And I know there are many
  • 52:43in this room that have been
  • 52:44here a lot longer than I have.
  • 52:46I've lived in New Haven for 14 years,
  • 52:49but I do I personally feel
  • 52:51like I've seen an evolution
  • 52:53even over even over that time.
  • 52:56I would, I mean,
  • 52:57I would say that. My impression,
  • 53:00at least if you go back 15 years or so,
  • 53:02was that it'd be the relationship
  • 53:05was a little bit like 2 neighbors who
  • 53:07live next to each other peaceably.
  • 53:09Not, not a lot of hostility necessarily,
  • 53:10but they don't necessarily
  • 53:11interact or talk that much.
  • 53:13I mean, you know,
  • 53:15peaceable coexistence maybe or I
  • 53:17think in in more recent years we've
  • 53:21developed, I think it was a much
  • 53:24more functional partnership where
  • 53:26both organizations are leveraging.
  • 53:28The the strengths and the strength of
  • 53:34one another and and appreciating you
  • 53:37know what we need to bring to the table
  • 53:38and can bring to the Community also.
  • 53:39So I think in that regard I mean
  • 53:42and there's there been a few changes
  • 53:44that I think have led to that.
  • 53:46There's been, there been a lot more kind of
  • 53:51transfers of folks between the organizations.
  • 53:54You know, people who've come from the
  • 53:56hospital or medical school to Cornell
  • 53:57Scott or vice versa are sharing
  • 54:00of an electronic health record,
  • 54:02which kind of runs everything of how we do.
  • 54:04That leads to a lot more visibility and
  • 54:07transparency between the organizations.
  • 54:09And then this partnership,
  • 54:11ultimately the Primary care consortium
  • 54:13with us adopting the primary
  • 54:16care clinics from the hospital,
  • 54:18we're at a place now and we can go
  • 54:20into more details where I really think
  • 54:22that we are able to take advantage of.
  • 54:24Some of the resources of the Academic
  • 54:26Medical Center and they're able to
  • 54:28recognize and appreciate and let
  • 54:30us do kind of what we do best.
  • 54:32So I think there's still opportunities
  • 54:35for for for work and.
  • 54:38And if you want me to go into
  • 54:39those now, no, no I think we
  • 54:41should give give a doctor Tucker
  • 54:42Kathy some time to talk as well.
  • 54:44But that thank you for those comments.
  • 54:47So. So Kathy you have worked at
  • 54:48Yale New Haven for a long time
  • 54:50and actually lived in in the
  • 54:51greater New Haven for even longer.
  • 54:53So you said both as a role
  • 54:54in the hospital and a role,
  • 54:55an important role in the Community.
  • 54:58From your perspective how has that
  • 55:01relationship between Yale New Haven
  • 55:03and the Greater New Haven area evolved?
  • 55:05And also I'd love to sort of because I think.
  • 55:08Sometimes we people have a closed
  • 55:10minded view of sort of the pressures
  • 55:11at the hospital feels and I'm sure
  • 55:13that you can speak to some of the
  • 55:14pressures that the hospital feels
  • 55:15about like they maybe they would
  • 55:17love to do all these great things,
  • 55:18but they're both financial and other
  • 55:20pressures that limit what what they can do.
  • 55:22So I'd love to to expand on
  • 55:24those type of things if you can.
  • 55:25Yeah, yes, I am a 27 year
  • 55:29employee of the hospital.
  • 55:31So I've been here, I grew up,
  • 55:32all my nursing career has
  • 55:34been here at the hospital.
  • 55:35And I've seen the tensions over the years.
  • 55:37I've seen the fights and the battles
  • 55:39over the years between the community
  • 55:41and the hospital and have learned
  • 55:43a little bit about, you know,
  • 55:44what it feels like to be on both sides of,
  • 55:47you know, of that experience.
  • 55:50I do happen to know because we're the
  • 55:52ones that are charged with fixing it.
  • 55:53You know, when when things go go
  • 55:56wrong or they're not going very well,
  • 55:58you know, so that it lands in our laps.
  • 56:01But it's a real important thing
  • 56:03to know that I think that the.
  • 56:05The message really from the
  • 56:07hospitals that they hear us,
  • 56:08but it's a hospital first and a lot
  • 56:11of times their position seems to
  • 56:14not necessarily connect with the
  • 56:16messages that are going on outside,
  • 56:18but there's real work going on on the inside.
  • 56:20And I know that personally
  • 56:21because we've all been, you know,
  • 56:22the people that kind of are
  • 56:24trying to do the work.
  • 56:25And I can just kind of Fast forward
  • 56:27to now to say this is what I can tell
  • 56:30you is happening now in the hospital.
  • 56:32There has been the establishment of
  • 56:33what is now the office of HealthEquity,
  • 56:36right?
  • 56:36Just based on all of the things that
  • 56:38we know about health disparities and
  • 56:39what we're showing up like in the
  • 56:41Community or not showing up like in
  • 56:43the Community and what we should do about it.
  • 56:45There's a real effort to try to
  • 56:47shift the culture of the organization
  • 56:49internally and really just focus on
  • 56:52teaching the employees in the hospital
  • 56:54what they can do about addressing
  • 56:56the social needs of the Community,
  • 56:58social determinants of health.
  • 56:59And things of that nature.
  • 57:00So there's a lot of work going on there.
  • 57:02There's been the establishment
  • 57:04of relationships with community
  • 57:06based organizations.
  • 57:06So now we're asking patients about their
  • 57:08financial needs and their transportation
  • 57:10needs and their housing needs and such.
  • 57:12There's an actual a mechanism that we can
  • 57:14now use to connect people into the care.
  • 57:16So it was one thing to ask the question and
  • 57:19then not be able to do anything about it,
  • 57:21but there's been a lot of effort on the
  • 57:23part of the organization to really,
  • 57:24you know, build those bridges.
  • 57:26And then,
  • 57:27you know,
  • 57:28give US resources to kind of connect
  • 57:30people into those resources to really
  • 57:32help some of the other work is around
  • 57:34the Community health needs assessment.
  • 57:36And it was really interesting for
  • 57:37me to hear part of the discussion
  • 57:39talking about what is community,
  • 57:40because that's been the age-old question.
  • 57:42What is community?
  • 57:43What does that look like?
  • 57:44Who is the community and
  • 57:46what we decided to do.
  • 57:48And I do a lot of work as the
  • 57:49liaison to Doctor Church.
  • 57:51Well,
  • 57:51now this is a recent appointment.
  • 57:53But the work with the office
  • 57:55of HealthEquity was really to
  • 57:56kind of like to find out what,
  • 57:58what do we mean by community and to
  • 58:00do some work trying to kind of unpack
  • 58:02the results of the Community health
  • 58:04needs assessment and then reimagine
  • 58:05what it can look like going forward.
  • 58:08So a lot of what, you know,
  • 58:11we did this past cycle was to really
  • 58:14kind of like lean into the employees
  • 58:17of the hospital who are residents.
  • 58:19Of the community and use those folks
  • 58:22and their opinion and their feedback
  • 58:24about what could be done as a hospital
  • 58:27better for them in the community.
  • 58:28So that's kind of where we started, you know,
  • 58:31trying to make some shifts and we're,
  • 58:33you know, again,
  • 58:33doing a lot of work going forward
  • 58:36about the next cycle of the
  • 58:38community health needs assessment.
  • 58:39So
  • 58:39yeah, that's why I have a I
  • 58:40could ask a lot of questions,
  • 58:42but I do want to let.
  • 58:44Merlin sort of respond or interject
  • 58:45on what he's heard and then
  • 58:47after that maybe we if anyone
  • 58:48has something they'd like to
  • 58:49respond or we could open it up
  • 58:51to the group after after Merlin
  • 58:54no I've basically been just digest Oh yeah
  • 58:57sorry yeah yeah they gave me my own yeah
  • 59:04no, I've basically been kind of just
  • 59:06digesting and and thinking but.
  • 59:10Some, some takeaways.
  • 59:12One is I'm very interested in hearing about.
  • 59:15I mean often times like for me as
  • 59:17somebody who I don't call myself
  • 59:19a community based research at all,
  • 59:21I'm not I I I look at paper all
  • 59:24day and usually paper written
  • 59:26by people who are deceased.
  • 59:28So I for me community always has
  • 59:32kind of an abstraction to it.
  • 59:34And so it's been fascinating to
  • 59:36hear from all three of you how
  • 59:38you have enacted it.
  • 59:39On the ground in some
  • 59:41ways, in what actual mechanisms
  • 59:43you have used to actually turn
  • 59:48a moral kind of demand for community
  • 59:52participation and avoidance of.
  • 59:56Insular administrative decisions that have
  • 59:58huge consequences for people's lives.
  • 01:00:01How you've actually sought to thought
  • 01:00:03to do that, I think there is kind of
  • 01:00:06a foot to the pedal aspect to it.
  • 01:00:08At some point you have to stop debating
  • 01:00:10what community is and who is really
  • 01:00:12the community and just try things.
  • 01:00:13And I'd be interested to know more
  • 01:00:16about what those mechanisms of
  • 01:00:18community are like for example, Mark,
  • 01:00:22how do you choose the 50% of the people
  • 01:00:25who are on the board and that sort of thing,
  • 01:00:27what kind of what kinds of
  • 01:00:28frictions is that that bring up?
  • 01:00:30But I'm fascinating to hear about that.
  • 01:00:33The second thing I'd like to
  • 01:00:35ask all of you actually is,
  • 01:00:37I'm sure everybody in this room
  • 01:00:39and everyone at this panel.
  • 01:00:40Has felt the impact that 2020
  • 01:00:44has had on the healthcare space,
  • 01:00:47not just around issues of racism
  • 01:00:50but I think larger issues about
  • 01:00:53the distribution of resources and
  • 01:00:55fairness and how we do public health.
  • 01:00:57One of the things that I felt
  • 01:01:01often is in the healthcare space.
  • 01:01:04You know if you're the diagram
  • 01:01:06like kind of the.
  • 01:01:08The responsiveness of of big
  • 01:01:11institutions in particular to disruption
  • 01:01:14to social dislocations like that,
  • 01:01:17it's like a big spike for a few years and
  • 01:01:19then you get back into the doldrum period.
  • 01:01:22And so I wondered,
  • 01:01:23as people have been in this game a long time,
  • 01:01:26how do you keep up that?
  • 01:01:28Those that pressure and that interest when
  • 01:01:30the when the broader public interest has
  • 01:01:33receded after you know the 2020 moment.
  • 01:01:36But my guess is that the office of
  • 01:01:39HealthEquity that you mentioned is a
  • 01:01:41direct consequence of 2020 because
  • 01:01:43we got a new one too.
  • 01:01:45And the question is you know is this
  • 01:01:47going to be a real office or one that
  • 01:01:50ultimately only exists on paper.
  • 01:01:51And I think it all comes down to if if.
  • 01:01:54If.
  • 01:01:55That kind of social foment and the
  • 01:01:57pressure can be maintained and
  • 01:01:59I wonder about that.
  • 01:02:01So those are kind of two reactions
  • 01:02:03actually, mark, if you want to take that.
  • 01:02:04The first question about the
  • 01:02:06responsiveness or how do you how
  • 01:02:08or if you know how Cornell Scott
  • 01:02:10identifies the individuals to be on
  • 01:02:12on the board and does that create,
  • 01:02:14has there been tension with what the
  • 01:02:16how they want the institution to move?
  • 01:02:20Yeah. I'm not sure the answer to that
  • 01:02:23question is probably super interesting.
  • 01:02:24I mean candidates are identified by by any,
  • 01:02:29by anybody in the organization,
  • 01:02:31some anybody who's a patient
  • 01:02:34and just as any board member
  • 01:02:36of any organization would do,
  • 01:02:37they kind of go through an
  • 01:02:39interview and a vetting process.
  • 01:02:40Obviously then the qualifications
  • 01:02:41are more than just being a patient.
  • 01:02:43You need to be able to serve as
  • 01:02:45a board member and commit to that
  • 01:02:46and what it would take and then.
  • 01:02:48An interview by the the Board and
  • 01:02:49the Governance Committee obviously
  • 01:02:51it which is over 50% patients also.
  • 01:02:54So it's it's sort of like any board it's
  • 01:02:57just a requirement of of being a patient.
  • 01:03:01So I don't know
  • 01:03:03well now we get to the
  • 01:03:04more juicy question. I'm
  • 01:03:05sure others may have other opinions
  • 01:03:06but that's that's actually the
  • 01:03:07extent that I know of it because
  • 01:03:08I'm I don't sit on the board myself
  • 01:03:10sure actually I'd love to hear
  • 01:03:11from Kathy in Virginia about
  • 01:03:13Merlin's larger question about.
  • 01:03:14The change in the hospital potentially
  • 01:03:16partly in response to sort of
  • 01:03:19social foment and how the does,
  • 01:03:21I mean, I imagine the hospital
  • 01:03:22wants to keep a commitment going
  • 01:03:24forward but the pressure lets off.
  • 01:03:26Does that stay.
  • 01:03:27So what's your sense from the
  • 01:03:28inside how that that happened?
  • 01:03:30Yeah no, I I acutely feel the commitment
  • 01:03:34by the hospital to operate differently.
  • 01:03:37I think that the pandemic exposed.
  • 01:03:41You know so much about where there were
  • 01:03:42gaps in the care and the relationship
  • 01:03:44between the community and where things
  • 01:03:46could and should be done differently.
  • 01:03:48And we saw the commitment during
  • 01:03:51the pandemic to, you know,
  • 01:03:53standing up testing centers and communities
  • 01:03:56of color and you know, you know,
  • 01:03:58when the vaccines were available,
  • 01:03:59vaccinating people in the in communities
  • 01:04:01have called, they did the work.
  • 01:04:02They were really there.
  • 01:04:03And I always say that the time to show up.
  • 01:04:07Is when there's nothing going on.
  • 01:04:09Because when the pandemic hit,
  • 01:04:11if you weren't already there,
  • 01:04:12you missed the bus.
  • 01:04:14All right, so the hospital was already that.
  • 01:04:16We already had relationships which
  • 01:04:17made it easier for us to do that.
  • 01:04:19Could it be better?
  • 01:04:20Of course, it could be nobody's.
  • 01:04:22We're not perfect.
  • 01:04:23And I'm not sitting here saying that we are,
  • 01:04:24there are opportunities to do things better.
  • 01:04:26But I will say that they stood
  • 01:04:29up in that moment,
  • 01:04:30and I do feel the the connection.
  • 01:04:33To the Community now very differently
  • 01:04:35as a result of the work that had been
  • 01:04:39done during that that period of time.
  • 01:04:41But the office of HealthEquity is a
  • 01:04:43system wide office of HealthEquity and it
  • 01:04:46is you know being developed as we speak.
  • 01:04:49And I'm actually here now
  • 01:04:50in place of Doctor Lou Park,
  • 01:04:51who's the medical director for the
  • 01:04:53office of HealthEquity and Darcy Cobbs.
  • 01:04:55Lomax was the director.
  • 01:04:58And there's a whole team that
  • 01:04:59they're assembling right now.
  • 01:05:00So this thing is expanding.
  • 01:05:02It's not getting smaller,
  • 01:05:03it's getting bigger and it's moving faster.
  • 01:05:05And there is a focus really on,
  • 01:05:07you know,
  • 01:05:08taking a look at our the health disparities,
  • 01:05:10you know,
  • 01:05:10that we have the ability to influence
  • 01:05:12and impact and really going forward with
  • 01:05:14making changes in how we deliver the care.
  • 01:05:16So I don't see it as a,
  • 01:05:17you know, a flash in a pan.
  • 01:05:20I don't see it that way.
  • 01:05:22That's not been the experience that I felt.
  • 01:05:24I've seen flashes in the pan
  • 01:05:25and this isn't that so.
  • 01:05:28Actually a good pivot to Virginia.
  • 01:05:29So you have been living in the
  • 01:05:30community for a long time.
  • 01:05:31You've seen efforts maybe in the past
  • 01:05:34that maybe have not not persisted.
  • 01:05:37What leverage do you feel
  • 01:05:39like you have to impact the,
  • 01:05:41do you feel like actually you respond?
  • 01:05:43But I want to hear about your sense
  • 01:05:44of how the leverage of the Community
  • 01:05:46to keep the pressure on or New Haven
  • 01:05:48in general to keep the pressure on for
  • 01:05:50the hospital to be more responsive.
  • 01:05:51So I would contend that the pressure
  • 01:05:54on the hospital started before COVID.
  • 01:05:57And I think their response to COVID
  • 01:05:59was a result of the decision they
  • 01:06:02made about moving the primary care.
  • 01:06:04So the community was up in arms about that.
  • 01:06:07And I think the hospital learned
  • 01:06:09the lesson that they had not
  • 01:06:11properly engaged the community,
  • 01:06:12that it was a decision that was
  • 01:06:14made behind closed doors without any
  • 01:06:16conversation with the community.
  • 01:06:18And it did not roll out the way
  • 01:06:19the hospital thought it would,
  • 01:06:21as it probably has had has over decades
  • 01:06:24as we've seen the hospital expand.
  • 01:06:27Into the the greater New Haven community.
  • 01:06:30So the lesson was learned there
  • 01:06:32that the community wants to be
  • 01:06:35informed and engaged around decisions
  • 01:06:37not just around our healthcare,
  • 01:06:39but how the hospital is going
  • 01:06:41to move through the city,
  • 01:06:42how they're going to move into the
  • 01:06:44community and what are the resource
  • 01:06:46and what are the Community needs that
  • 01:06:48we need the hospital to be responsive.
  • 01:06:50Too, and I think because of the
  • 01:06:53primary care situation,
  • 01:06:54the hospital was well prepared
  • 01:06:56when COVID hit.
  • 01:06:58So we saw testing centers and vaccinations.
  • 01:07:02We saw that system fall into
  • 01:07:06place effortlessly because they,
  • 01:07:08I believe they learn their lesson.
  • 01:07:10I believe they understood what the
  • 01:07:12need was going to be and what the
  • 01:07:14response from the Community was going to be.
  • 01:07:18I'm actually, I mean again
  • 01:07:19I have followup questions,
  • 01:07:20but I do want to open it up to the group.
  • 01:07:23And also I know there was a question
  • 01:07:25already online make sure we'll
  • 01:07:26start with a question in the room.
  • 01:07:28I'll have to repeat the question,
  • 01:07:29but so keep it brief. I guess
  • 01:07:32my question is
  • 01:07:38thank you for your your talk.
  • 01:07:40It really did kind of add some
  • 01:07:43perspective to what the experience.
  • 01:07:47I am a New Haven resident who was
  • 01:07:50also employed by the hospital.
  • 01:07:52I wonder if in your in your research you
  • 01:07:58have looked at the relationship between
  • 01:08:01the Medical Center and the academic
  • 01:08:05institution and how that plays because
  • 01:08:08this is very much a green person dance
  • 01:08:12and the hospital and the community.
  • 01:08:17University is, you know,
  • 01:08:19separate but equally something you know,
  • 01:08:22it's a.
  • 01:08:23It's an interesting dynamic,
  • 01:08:25and I wonder how that plays into the
  • 01:08:30the success of the relationship
  • 01:08:33between unity and Health Center.
  • 01:08:38So I I will repeat the IT
  • 01:08:39looks like the the ASL
  • 01:08:40interpreter was able to hear it.
  • 01:08:41So maybe the the people on
  • 01:08:42the webinar could hear it.
  • 01:08:43But I will just repeat the question briefly.
  • 01:08:46The question was really focusing on in
  • 01:08:49your research in Merlin specifically.
  • 01:08:50So we talked about the
  • 01:08:52academic mental center,
  • 01:08:53but it's the Medical Center and the
  • 01:08:55academic institution which both have
  • 01:08:57their own I mean to to to improvise.
  • 01:08:59Have their own sort of needs and demands.
  • 01:09:03Did you look at that access as
  • 01:09:05well between the university
  • 01:09:06and the and the Medical Center?
  • 01:09:09Yeah, I mean that's a terrific question.
  • 01:09:12Yes and no. I think it's more of an implicit
  • 01:09:15kind of thread than an explicit one.
  • 01:09:18I the one thing I at some point when I
  • 01:09:21was looking at academic medical centers
  • 01:09:23in particular that I asked myself is.
  • 01:09:27Is the tension between academic medical
  • 01:09:29centers and their neighborhoods,
  • 01:09:30is there something special about it or
  • 01:09:33is it actually just bound up with the
  • 01:09:37larger antagonism between say Yale and New
  • 01:09:40Haven or Columbia and Harlem or you know,
  • 01:09:43we can go on University of Chicago
  • 01:09:45and the South South side etcetera?
  • 01:09:47I think sometimes it is the same BLOB
  • 01:09:50and there and community members are
  • 01:09:52responding to kind of larger institutions
  • 01:09:55that particularly pull their weight with
  • 01:09:58or throw their weight around rather with
  • 01:10:01real estate and economic and political
  • 01:10:04control of large parts of the city.
  • 01:10:07I also think there is a particular though
  • 01:10:11a particular character to the Medical
  • 01:10:14Center in neighborhood relationship.
  • 01:10:17I actually think it's a very symbolic.
  • 01:10:19There's a symbolic aspect to it too,
  • 01:10:21because there's just something jarring
  • 01:10:23about healing institution and often
  • 01:10:27a very rich healing institution
  • 01:10:29that's very technologically intensive
  • 01:10:31and well capitalized.
  • 01:10:32And the juxtaposition between
  • 01:10:35that and deprivation,
  • 01:10:36I think there's something
  • 01:10:38about that gulf that.
  • 01:10:40Emotionally resonates with people
  • 01:10:43as quite unjust, quite unfair.
  • 01:10:46Especially when,
  • 01:10:47as in the case of Cleveland,
  • 01:10:49the the the entity is also expanding
  • 01:10:52literally to where they live.
  • 01:10:55So in
  • 01:10:55some, in some cases it's the
  • 01:10:57it's the kind of larger BLOB,
  • 01:10:59and in some cases it is the meta.
  • 01:11:01There's particularities
  • 01:11:02of the Medical Center.
  • 01:11:04I think another issue, I think Ben
  • 01:11:05talked to me about this the other day.
  • 01:11:07I certainly know it's an issue in one
  • 01:11:10of my previous stops in Philadelphia
  • 01:11:12and it's all these institutions,
  • 01:11:16medical or or the larger university
  • 01:11:19entity are tax free, right.
  • 01:11:21And so there's a big but you know,
  • 01:11:24I mean nonprofit in in legal and name,
  • 01:11:27but certainly.
  • 01:11:29Lots of flush revenue coming coming
  • 01:11:32through these institutions and so the
  • 01:11:34big question is if that is happening,
  • 01:11:37what kinds of policies might be put
  • 01:11:39into place for these institutions
  • 01:11:41to contribute something back and
  • 01:11:44you know pilots is is 1 possible
  • 01:11:47route I actually am interested
  • 01:11:49in public benefit and how?
  • 01:11:53I think it's actually a potential tool
  • 01:11:56for community members and activists to
  • 01:12:00use to press institutions to follow
  • 01:12:02not just the letter of the law,
  • 01:12:05but the spirit of the public
  • 01:12:08benefit provisions,
  • 01:12:09which have been considerably
  • 01:12:11strengthened by the ACA.
  • 01:12:13And I'd be curious to know from
  • 01:12:16my New Haven Co panelists how
  • 01:12:20that has actually played out.
  • 01:12:22I I know certainly that there is what
  • 01:12:26you might call charitably creative
  • 01:12:29accounting and some at some academic
  • 01:12:32medical centers where you know
  • 01:12:34things like Medicaid reimbursements
  • 01:12:37or Medicaid funded care is is
  • 01:12:39counted somehow as public benefit.
  • 01:12:41I think I think as I interpreted
  • 01:12:44the spirit of that requirement
  • 01:12:46and that mandate and the kind of
  • 01:12:50larger social social movement.
  • 01:12:52Reason why that that public benefit
  • 01:12:55benefit requirement was passed.
  • 01:12:57It's it's they're supposed to be
  • 01:13:00spending it on real public health
  • 01:13:02programs not just counting things
  • 01:13:05that they already do as you know
  • 01:13:08fulfilling that but I do that is
  • 01:13:10also something that I think is
  • 01:13:12unique to medical centers and in in
  • 01:13:15terms of in terms of responsiveness
  • 01:13:17to neighborhood
  • 01:13:18pressure. So Kathy,
  • 01:13:19to put you on this spot,
  • 01:13:21so you you brought up that
  • 01:13:22can we help benefit sort of
  • 01:13:24what's your perspective on it?
  • 01:13:26And I will say there is actually
  • 01:13:28still continuing pressure
  • 01:13:29in Congress about how the,
  • 01:13:30how hospitals navigate that,
  • 01:13:32that process of being a nonprofit.
  • 01:13:35So I think it's a story
  • 01:13:36that's still being told,
  • 01:13:38but I'd love to hear your thoughts.
  • 01:13:39Yeah, exactly. I think that's exactly
  • 01:13:41what I'm saying is that we know that
  • 01:13:43there's probably an opportunity to
  • 01:13:45do things differently than what.
  • 01:13:47Has been done in the past and that
  • 01:13:49is that cycle we're we're kind of in
  • 01:13:50the middle of right now and kind of
  • 01:13:52redefining what that looks like or
  • 01:13:54what that could look like in the past.
  • 01:13:57You know I think you know it wasn't
  • 01:14:00as transparent as we would like
  • 01:14:01for it to be going forward.
  • 01:14:03So that's that's all I can really
  • 01:14:05say about that at this point because
  • 01:14:07I don't really have the you know
  • 01:14:08the depth of knowledge to be able to
  • 01:14:10speak to what's actually been done
  • 01:14:12and say it with credibility so but.
  • 01:14:15But I do think that there's an
  • 01:14:16opportunity for us to be a little
  • 01:14:17bit more transparent and be more
  • 01:14:18involved in the process that I do know.
  • 01:14:22So actually, Mark,
  • 01:14:25I mean I would, when I actually would give my
  • 01:14:27hospital colleagues a lot of credit on this,
  • 01:14:30we take care of a lot of uninsured patients.
  • 01:14:33And I mean, I think one place where there
  • 01:14:36can be very little debate about whether
  • 01:14:38it's community benefit is the free and
  • 01:14:40discounted care that the hospital provides
  • 01:14:42to uninsured patients. I mean, we.
  • 01:14:43For patients who don't have health insurance,
  • 01:14:46we can get them essentially any
  • 01:14:48medically necessary service what
  • 01:14:49they need at the hospital.
  • 01:14:50And I I don't know if it is
  • 01:14:52that that way in other cities,
  • 01:14:53but it it's it's phenomenal
  • 01:14:56from our perspective.
  • 01:14:57We don't have to spend a lot of time
  • 01:14:59stressing about how we're going to
  • 01:15:01get our patients what they need.
  • 01:15:02The question about Medicaid and
  • 01:15:04whether to count in community benefit,
  • 01:15:06the gap between what Medicaid
  • 01:15:08pays and what it costs to provide
  • 01:15:10a service is interesting
  • 01:15:12and in some regards.
  • 01:15:15I wouldn't mind if academic medical
  • 01:15:17centers got credit for that so
  • 01:15:19to speak as community benefit
  • 01:15:21because it might provide a little
  • 01:15:23bit of an additional incentive to
  • 01:15:25provide care to Medicaid patients.
  • 01:15:27So you know you if you don't get
  • 01:15:29credit so to speak for for the
  • 01:15:31losses that you are are taking there,
  • 01:15:33then the the incentive is to shift
  • 01:15:35services away from Medicaid patients.
  • 01:15:37So I think there's kind of two
  • 01:15:39sides to that coin.
  • 01:15:41No, it might be contextual too. Yeah.
  • 01:15:43Especially with an if there's an
  • 01:15:45institution that historically has slighted
  • 01:15:48or tried to avoid Medicaid patients.
  • 01:15:52So I would play the devil's advocate
  • 01:15:54with that because as a community member,
  • 01:15:57we don't see that part of the
  • 01:15:59investment in the city, right.
  • 01:16:01We see that as an investment
  • 01:16:02in a in a patient's outcomes,
  • 01:16:04which is important.
  • 01:16:05But when you have streets that have potholes.
  • 01:16:09When you have a very small tax base
  • 01:16:11because of the university and the hospital,
  • 01:16:14it's harder from a Community perspective
  • 01:16:16to see the added value of giving
  • 01:16:19that resource to the Community.
  • 01:16:21We we have a phrase that we use.
  • 01:16:22So I run a civil rights organization.
  • 01:16:24We call it colored money when
  • 01:16:26cities are disinvested and there
  • 01:16:29are not buses that go out to Long
  • 01:16:32Wharf to provide transportation
  • 01:16:34to folks who need medical care.
  • 01:16:37There's there's a disconnect
  • 01:16:39between what the the community
  • 01:16:40sees as an investment and what the
  • 01:16:43hospital may see as an added value
  • 01:16:45or an investment in a community.
  • 01:16:48I'm not saying that it's not a value,
  • 01:16:49it's it's a huge value because
  • 01:16:51we know there are folks that are.
  • 01:16:53Underinsured and uninsured.
  • 01:16:54So it's important that folks get healthcare.
  • 01:16:57But we also want the hospital and
  • 01:16:59the university because we can't
  • 01:17:00let them off the hook.
  • 01:17:01We want them both to be invested
  • 01:17:03in what the Community looks like.
  • 01:17:06You know,
  • 01:17:07if our if there's trash overflowing
  • 01:17:09in receptacles by the hospital,
  • 01:17:11what does that mean about the hospital's
  • 01:17:14commitment to the neighborhood?
  • 01:17:16You know, I live.
  • 01:17:17In West River,
  • 01:17:18my office is directly across the
  • 01:17:20street from the Saint Refills Camp
  • 01:17:22campus and where the new neoscience
  • 01:17:24center is going to be built.
  • 01:17:25And we as a community,
  • 01:17:28we're excited because medical advancement
  • 01:17:30is important to the community.
  • 01:17:32However,
  • 01:17:33investment in our communities
  • 01:17:35is equally important.
  • 01:17:37And what does that look like to a
  • 01:17:39community member versus a hospital?
  • 01:17:42There's another question in the.
  • 01:17:51You know, are there other options
  • 01:17:53with medical experience that are
  • 01:17:55really going into creative grounds,
  • 01:17:59really appreciated.
  • 01:17:59The point about the buses and infrastructure,
  • 01:18:02I just wonder, you know,
  • 01:18:03and I appreciated that between the hospital
  • 01:18:05is trying to get people in touch with
  • 01:18:07resources and having this conversation,
  • 01:18:09it's not important that as institutions
  • 01:18:11are there any institutions?
  • 01:18:13I think the country are really
  • 01:18:16taking on the bigger issue
  • 01:18:20of,
  • 01:18:24well, I'll give you an answer that's kind
  • 01:18:26of more of a referral and it's so I think
  • 01:18:30a lot of people here may actually be
  • 01:18:32familiar with the late Fitzhugh Mullen,
  • 01:18:34who was a physician activist who
  • 01:18:37ran this thing called Project Hope,
  • 01:18:39which publishes the journal Health
  • 01:18:42Affairs and he passed away I think.
  • 01:18:45A couple, couple of years ago.
  • 01:18:46But every time I would correspond
  • 01:18:49with him fits as, as he was called,
  • 01:18:52delighted in pointing out to me that
  • 01:18:55Columbia ranked very low on the list of on,
  • 01:18:58on a list of kind of academic medical
  • 01:19:01institutions that contributed
  • 01:19:02to their community.
  • 01:19:04Every year he would put out this ranking
  • 01:19:06and it would have it would include
  • 01:19:09everything from spending on on, on.
  • 01:19:13Programs and infrastructure and initiatives,
  • 01:19:17community outreach stuff to the
  • 01:19:19demographic composition of the
  • 01:19:21kinds of people it it hired.
  • 01:19:23And so he always loved to rid me
  • 01:19:25about how haha Columbia is like
  • 01:19:27in 59th place out of 60 years.
  • 01:19:29So my answer is,
  • 01:19:30I think that index is actually
  • 01:19:32pretty was pretty powerful for me in
  • 01:19:35terms of having a systemized rubric.
  • 01:19:38So I would refer you to it at
  • 01:19:41projecthope.org. Yeah, but.
  • 01:19:44As well as these New Haven projects
  • 01:19:46which sound great.
  • 01:19:50I do want there's one question from
  • 01:19:53the the chat that I'll put in bring
  • 01:19:55it I think Kathy that it will sure
  • 01:19:57you could hopefully address it.
  • 01:19:59Unfortunately you're on the hot seat again.
  • 01:20:03So I had the question is how do I talk
  • 01:20:04with the C-Suite about this or how do
  • 01:20:06we talk to the C-Suite about this.
  • 01:20:07How do I get the them presumably the
  • 01:20:10executives in the hospital to see
  • 01:20:11importance of social justice and how at the.
  • 01:20:14Academic Medical Center interacts with
  • 01:20:15me that people live right around the
  • 01:20:17the corner in fancy building around
  • 01:20:19the corner from the fancy buildings.
  • 01:20:20How do I get them to see that responsibility
  • 01:20:23and then ask we have to address the
  • 01:20:25food desert and transportation issues
  • 01:20:26and need for job training programs and
  • 01:20:28mental health treatment and health
  • 01:20:29and and we should be doing more for
  • 01:20:31the people right here in New Haven.
  • 01:20:38It's true you know.
  • 01:20:40Again you know they're.
  • 01:20:42Your voices are very important
  • 01:20:43and I think that you know,
  • 01:20:45really just showing up to, you know,
  • 01:20:47opportunities where I don't know when,
  • 01:20:50if this is an employee, it's anonymous,
  • 01:20:53it's an anonymous person.
  • 01:20:54So obviously I can speak for
  • 01:20:56employees of the hospital.
  • 01:20:57We have mechanisms that we can
  • 01:20:59speak to our leadership, you know,
  • 01:21:01I'm not really sure what to
  • 01:21:03advise about community outreach,
  • 01:21:05but you know.
  • 01:21:06There are probably mechanisms
  • 01:21:08to reach the leadership.
  • 01:21:09I don't know what to OfferUp
  • 01:21:11in that in that regard,
  • 01:21:13but I would say make your voice heard.
  • 01:21:14Do
  • 01:21:17you have something?
  • 01:21:25Sure. And go ahead. And did any,
  • 01:21:27did you have a question?
  • 01:21:32I just find the paving specifically
  • 01:21:35also generally in your experience in
  • 01:21:37the studies you've done, what's the
  • 01:21:42so new here? Just to be clear,
  • 01:21:43New Haven does a very some very
  • 01:21:45powerful unions that is pushing the
  • 01:21:47university and the hospital and the
  • 01:21:49city to do a better job so that we do
  • 01:21:51feel that pressure here in the city.
  • 01:21:56Well, I guess I could tie this
  • 01:21:58actually to the person I opened.
  • 01:22:00My remarks with Sarah Nelson,
  • 01:22:03so she is identified with a brand
  • 01:22:05of unionism that has sometimes been
  • 01:22:07referred to as social justice unionism.
  • 01:22:10And the idea behind social justice unionism,
  • 01:22:12which is very controversial
  • 01:22:13within the labor movement,
  • 01:22:15is how wide should the
  • 01:22:17purview of Labor unions be?
  • 01:22:19Should labor unions only focus on
  • 01:22:23aggressively getting amazing contracts
  • 01:22:25and benefits and wages for their own
  • 01:22:28workers within the circumscribed union?
  • 01:22:30Or do labor unions actually
  • 01:22:32have to not only do that,
  • 01:22:34but also works often in coalition
  • 01:22:38with community members to to address
  • 01:22:42other parts of of the society really
  • 01:22:45beyond just the workplace and the
  • 01:22:48the rank and file a particular union.
  • 01:22:50And in addition to President Nelson,
  • 01:22:53I would say another exemplar of
  • 01:22:55social justice unionism is the
  • 01:22:57Chicago Teachers Union in Chicago,
  • 01:22:59which has gone on strike.
  • 01:23:00Two times over the past decade,
  • 01:23:02but attracted huge community support.
  • 01:23:05And I think it's largely because
  • 01:23:06they did a lot of base building
  • 01:23:09in Chicago neighborhoods.
  • 01:23:10So people understood that the
  • 01:23:11strike wasn't just quote UN quote,
  • 01:23:13selfish teachers going on strike,
  • 01:23:15but that they were fighting for
  • 01:23:18better schools for people in the
  • 01:23:21community and and also for a number
  • 01:23:24of community improvements that
  • 01:23:26may not have had anything directly
  • 01:23:28to do with wages and benefits.
  • 01:23:31So to answer your question about this,
  • 01:23:32I think the social justice Union
  • 01:23:34debate has actually been also
  • 01:23:36a friction in health union,
  • 01:23:38health worker unions.
  • 01:23:39In a lot of the activism that I
  • 01:23:42looked at in the 1960s and 1970s,
  • 01:23:44I was actually surprised to see
  • 01:23:46that in a lot of these debates about
  • 01:23:50town and gown relationships and the
  • 01:23:52racism of academic medical centers
  • 01:23:54like the Cleveland Clinic and,
  • 01:23:56you know, name all your other,
  • 01:23:58name, all your other causes that.
  • 01:24:00Some of the most militant and
  • 01:24:03successful and left wing health
  • 01:24:04worker unions were actually not
  • 01:24:06very active in those campaigns.
  • 01:24:09They were very active in the
  • 01:24:11wages and benefits struggles,
  • 01:24:12but less so on larger kind of health
  • 01:24:16issues beyond wages and benefits.
  • 01:24:19I think that's changing a lot,
  • 01:24:21but I think it depends a lot on the local.
  • 01:24:24And the leadership in the local,
  • 01:24:26there's a lot of variation.
  • 01:24:27So, you know,
  • 01:24:29the Chicago Teachers Union does their thing,
  • 01:24:31but you know the a FTUFT and New York
  • 01:24:34City probably with a less holistic what,
  • 01:24:39how about you?
  • 01:24:40You
  • 01:24:41probably have said on both
  • 01:24:44sides of those conversations.
  • 01:24:46Okay, fair enough.
  • 01:24:47Okay, fair enough. Financial wealth.
  • 01:24:50I do want to acknowledge that thank you
  • 01:24:52we're we're at time now but so I do
  • 01:24:55want to thank everyone for attending that.
  • 01:24:57Thank you for our panelists
  • 01:24:59for excellent conversation.
  • 01:24:59Thank you Merlin for for priming
  • 01:25:02the conversation with the research
  • 01:25:04you've done and thank you the
  • 01:25:06program the humanities medicine
  • 01:25:08for hosting us and Doctor Reisman
  • 01:25:10and Karen but yeah thank you.