2016
Contextual Effects in Judgments of Taste Intensity: No Assimilation, Sometimes Contrast
Shepard TG, Shavit AY, Veldhuizen MG, Marks LE. Contextual Effects in Judgments of Taste Intensity: No Assimilation, Sometimes Contrast. Perception 2016, 46: 268-282. PMID: 28024444, PMCID: PMC5944861, DOI: 10.1177/0301006616686099.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsStimulus contextExperiment 1Sense modalitiesSensory modalitiesIntensity judgmentsExperiment 4Experiment 2Contextual contrastSuccessive stimuliEvidence of contrastEvidence of assimilationContextual effectsTaste intensityTest sessionsResponse scaleJudgmentsStimuliLoudnessMagnitude estimationTaste perceptionVisual analogueConsistent evidenceTaste stimuliFlavor Identification and Intensity: Effects of Stimulus Context
Hallowell ES, Parikh R, Veldhuizen MG, Marks LE. Flavor Identification and Intensity: Effects of Stimulus Context. Chemical Senses 2016, 41: 249-259. PMID: 26830499, PMCID: PMC5006141, DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjv087.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsStimulus contextSensory eventsSignal detection theoryDifferent sessionsPerceptual spaceFlavor identificationIntensity ratingsOlfactory flavorantsContextual conditionsCitrus componentsDifferent contextsSweet intensityTask of identificationRatingsSessionsContextResponse criteriaStimuliJudgmentsTaskOral mixtureDecision rulesTheory
2015
Response Times to Gustatory–Olfactory Flavor Mixtures: Role of Congruence
Shepard TG, Veldhuizen MG, Marks LE. Response Times to Gustatory–Olfactory Flavor Mixtures: Role of Congruence. Chemical Senses 2015, 40: 565-575. PMID: 26304508, PMCID: PMC4675834, DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjv042.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2014
Lower Pitch Is Larger, Yet Falling Pitches Shrink
Eitan Z, Schupak A, Gotler A, Marks LE. Lower Pitch Is Larger, Yet Falling Pitches Shrink. Experimental Psychology 2014, 61: 273-284. PMID: 24351984, DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000246.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2013
Identification of Gustatory–Olfactory Flavor Mixtures: Effects of Linguistic Labeling
Brewer JM, Shavit AY, Shepard TG, Veldhuizen MG, Parikh R, Marks LE. Identification of Gustatory–Olfactory Flavor Mixtures: Effects of Linguistic Labeling. Chemical Senses 2013, 38: 305-313. PMID: 23329730, PMCID: PMC3629875, DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjs142.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2011
Flavor-intensity perception: Effects of stimulus context
Marks LE, Shepard TG, Burger K, Chakwin EM. Flavor-intensity perception: Effects of stimulus context. Physiology & Behavior 2011, 105: 443-450. PMID: 21930139, PMCID: PMC3225720, DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.08.039.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2010
Post-transient shifts in auditory lateralization: Effects of target level
Arieh Y, Marks L. Post-transient shifts in auditory lateralization: Effects of target level. The Journal Of The Acoustical Society Of America 2010, 127: 1-4. PMID: 20058943, DOI: 10.1121/1.3270393.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2009
Taste Coding after Selective Inhibition by Chlorhexidine
Wang M, Marks L, Frank M. Taste Coding after Selective Inhibition by Chlorhexidine. Chemical Senses 2009, 34: 653-666. PMID: 19703921, PMCID: PMC2745350, DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjp047.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTaste of NaClMM chlorhexidineChlorhexidine gluconatePrototypic stimulusMultiple receptorsChlorhexidineBitter stimuliQuinine tastesGustatory systemSalt tasteQuinine hydrochlorideSelective inhibitionTaste codingQuininePartial inhibitionTreatmentSalty tasteStimuliInhibitionMultiple stimuliAcid taste