2023
Changes in Older Adult Trauma Quality When Evaluated Using Longer-Term Outcomes vs In-Hospital Mortality
Zogg C, Cooper Z, Peduzzi P, Falvey J, Castillo-Angeles M, Kodadek L, Staudenmayer K, Davis K, Tinetti M, Lichtman J. Changes in Older Adult Trauma Quality When Evaluated Using Longer-Term Outcomes vs In-Hospital Mortality. JAMA Surgery 2023, 158: e234856. PMID: 37792354, PMCID: PMC10551815, DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.4856.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsHospital-level factorsTraumatic brain injurySevere traumatic brain injuryHospital mortalityTrauma QualityOlder adultsHip fractureComposite scoreHigher risk-adjusted oddsLevel 1 trauma centerIn-Hospital MortalityRisk-adjusted oddsLong-term outcomesMultivariable logistic regressionNontrauma centersTrauma patientsTerm outcomesTrauma centerPrimary diagnosisBrain injuryTrauma systemMAIN OUTCOMEMedicare feeService claimsForms of trauma
2015
2014 ACC/AHA Key Data Elements and Definitions for Cardiovascular Endpoint Events in Clinical Trials A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Data Standards (Writing Committee to Develop Cardiovascular Endpoints Data Standards)
Hicks K, Tcheng J, Bozkurt B, Chaitman B, Cutlip D, Farb A, Fonarow G, Jacobs J, Jaff M, Lichtman J, Limacher M, Mahaffey K, Mehran R, Nissen S, Smith E, Targum S. 2014 ACC/AHA Key Data Elements and Definitions for Cardiovascular Endpoint Events in Clinical Trials A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Data Standards (Writing Committee to Develop Cardiovascular Endpoints Data Standards). Journal Of Nuclear Cardiology 2015, 22: 1041-1144. PMID: 26204990, DOI: 10.1007/s12350-015-0209-1.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAmerican Heart AssociationCardiologyCardiovascular DiseasesClinical Trials as TopicCommon Data ElementsConfidentialityDatabases, FactualEndpoint DeterminationHealth Insurance Portability and Accountability ActHumansQuality Assurance, Health CareQuality of Health CareReproducibility of ResultsResearch DesignSocieties, MedicalTerminology as TopicTranslational Research, BiomedicalTreatment OutcomeUnited States
1996
Criterion Validity of the NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children Version 2.3 (DISC-2.3)
SCHWAB-STONE M, SHAFFER D, DULCAN M, JENSEN P, FISHER P, BIRD H, GOODMAN S, LAHEY B, LICHTMAN J, CANINO G, RUBIO-STIPEC M, RAE D. Criterion Validity of the NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children Version 2.3 (DISC-2.3). Journal Of The American Academy Of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 1996, 35: 878-888. PMID: 8768347, DOI: 10.1097/00004583-199607000-00013.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsNIMH Diagnostic Interview ScheduleChildren Version 2.3Diagnostic Interview ScheduleAdolescent Mental Disorders (MECA) StudyClinician symptom ratingsEpidemiology of ChildPresence of symptomsMental Disorders StudyNumber of diagnosesCriterion validityInterview scheduleSpecific diagnostic areasNIMH MethodsParent-youth pairsDiagnostic areasDiagnostic agreementSymptom ratingsSymptom reportsPrimary caregiversDiagnosisComparison of discScreen negativesDisorders StudyGood validityValidity study