2024
Risk Prediction for Clonal Cytopenia: Multicenter Real-World Evidence
Xie Z, Komrokji R, Al Ali N, Smith A, Geyer S, Patel A, Saygin C, Zeidan A, Bewersdorf J, Mendez L, Kishtagari A, Zeidner J, Coombs C, Madanat Y, Chung S, Badar T, Foran J, Desai P, Tsai C, Griffiths E, Al Malki M, Amanam I, Lai C, Deeg H, Ades L, Yi C, Osman A, Dinner S, Abaza Y, Taylor J, Chandhok N, Soong D, Brunner A, Carraway H, Singh A, Elena C, Ferrari J, Gallì A, Pozzi S, Padron E, Patnaik M, Malcovati L, Savona M, Al-Kali A. Risk Prediction for Clonal Cytopenia: Multicenter Real-World Evidence. Blood 2024 PMID: 38996210, DOI: 10.1182/blood.2024024756.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMyeloid neoplasmsIncidence of MNClonal cytopeniaCumulative incidencePlatelet count <High-risk mutationsCox proportional hazards modelsVariant allele fractionProportional hazards modelClinical trial designCCUS patientsStratify patientsGray's testC-indexDisease entityRisk groupsCytopeniasAllele fractionSomatic mutationsRisk factorsHigh riskNatural historyRisk scoreHazards modelPatientsA first-in-human, phase 1, dose escalation study of SGR-2921 as monotherapy in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome.
Weiss D, Dinardo C, Strickland S, Skikne B, Zeidan A, Traer E, Carraway H, Carraway H, Frankel S, Wang J, Pirie-Shepherd S, Piccotti J, Wright D, Akinsanya K. A first-in-human, phase 1, dose escalation study of SGR-2921 as monotherapy in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2024, 42: tps6590-tps6590. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2024.42.16_suppl.tps6590.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchEastern Cooperative Oncology GroupCell line-derived xenograftsDose-escalation studyMaximum tolerated dosePatient-derived xenograftsHigh riskEscalation studyTreatment armsEffects of CYP3A4 inhibitionRecommended phase 2 doseRelapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemiaPhase 2 doseAccelerated titration designMinichromosome maintenance protein 2Preliminary antitumor activityCooperative Oncology GroupFirst-in-humanAcute myeloid leukemiaGrade 2 eventsTreated patient populationTolerated dose levelsAML cell linesAnti-tumor activityInhibition of Cdc7Cancer cell death
2023
Validation of the Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-M) in Patients (Pts) with Myelodysplastic Syndromes/Neoplasms (MDS) Who Underwent Allogenic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT)
Kewan T, Bewersdorf J, Blaha O, Stahl M, Al Ali N, DeZern A, Sekeres M, Uy G, Carraway H, Desai P, Griffiths E, Stein E, Brunner A, Amaya M, Zeidner J, Savona M, Stempel J, Chandhok N, Logothetis C, Cochran H, Rose A, Roboz G, Wang E, Rolles B, Harris A, Shallis R, Xie Z, Padron E, Maciejewski J, Sallman D, Della Porta M, Komrokji R, Zeidan A. Validation of the Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-M) in Patients (Pts) with Myelodysplastic Syndromes/Neoplasms (MDS) Who Underwent Allogenic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT). Blood 2023, 142: 4980. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2023-186578.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchOverall survivalHigh-risk groupUnderwent HSCTC-indexRisk groupsHigh riskDonor typeInternational Prognostic Scoring SystemAllogenic stem cell transplantationTime of HSCTMedian overall survivalReduced-intensity conditioningSignificant OS differencePrognostic scoring systemRisk stratification toolTime of diagnosisStem cell transplantationSingle-institution analysisLog-rank testHarrell's C-indexDifferent overall survivalCox proportional hazardsHMA cyclesHaploidentical donorsMaintenance therapyPost Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Outcomes Following Response to Hypomethylating Agent Therapy in Myelodysplastic Syndromes Are Predicted By Persistent International Prognostic Scoring System-Molecular Risk
Frumm S, Kim H, Kelkar A, Ho V, Gooptu M, Gibson C, Koreth J, Shapiro R, Romee R, Nikiforow S, Antin J, Soiffer R, Rolles B, Shimony S, Bewersdorf J, Kewan T, Alhajahjeh A, Luskin M, Garcia J, Chen E, Lane A, Wadleigh M, Winer E, Stone R, DeAngelo D, Zeidan A, Lindsley C, Cutler C, Stahl M. Post Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Outcomes Following Response to Hypomethylating Agent Therapy in Myelodysplastic Syndromes Are Predicted By Persistent International Prognostic Scoring System-Molecular Risk. Blood 2023, 142: 3618. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2023-185220.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchHematopoietic stem cell transplantBlood count recoveryPost-HCT outcomesComplete remissionTime of diagnosisMyelodysplastic syndromeOverall survivalHigh riskLower riskAgent therapyCount recoveryMolecular riskInternational Working Group response criteriaShorter median overall survivalResponse criteriaDana-Farber Cancer InstituteHCT comorbidity indexImportant prognostic impactTAC/sirolimusHost disease (GVHD) prophylaxisMedian overall survivalProgression-free survivalStem cell transplantBone marrow biopsyFuture prospective studiesEfficacy of Imetelstat in Achieving Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) across Different Risk Subgroups in Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS) Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) to Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents (ESAs) in IMerge Phase 3 Study
Komrokji R, Santini V, Fenaux P, Savona M, Madanat Y, Berry T, Sherman L, Navada S, Feller F, Sun L, Xia Q, Wan Y, Huang F, Zeidan A, Platzbecker U. Efficacy of Imetelstat in Achieving Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) across Different Risk Subgroups in Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS) Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) to Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents (ESAs) in IMerge Phase 3 Study. Blood 2023, 142: 194. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2023-181237.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchInternational Prognostic Scoring SystemLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesDifferent risk subgroupsErythropoiesis stimulating agentsLow-risk subgroupsRisk groupsRisk subgroupsResponse rateTI ratesRBC-TIClinical efficacyRisk categoriesHigh riskLower riskRed blood cell transfusion independenceIPSS risk groupPhase 3 portionIntermediate-risk groupCytogenetic risk groupHigh-risk patientsPhase 3 studyPrognostic scoring systemIntermediate-risk subgroupsHigh-risk subgroupsHigh-risk groupA Simple Prediction Model of Outcomes after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HCT) in Myelodysplastic Syndromes Using HCT-Comorbidity Index, Cytogenetic Risk, and Platelet Count
Frumm S, Kim H, Kelkar A, Ho V, Gooptu M, Gibson C, Koreth J, Shapiro R, Romee R, Nikiforow S, Antin J, Soiffer R, Rolles B, Shimony S, Bewersdorf J, Kewan T, Alhajahjeh A, Luskin M, Garcia J, Chen E, Lane A, Wadleigh M, Winer E, Stone R, DeAngelo D, Zeidan A, Lindsley C, Cutler C, Stahl M. A Simple Prediction Model of Outcomes after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HCT) in Myelodysplastic Syndromes Using HCT-Comorbidity Index, Cytogenetic Risk, and Platelet Count. Blood 2023, 142: 2246. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2023-185315.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchHematopoietic stem cell transplantHCT comorbidity indexNon-relapse mortalityPost-HCT outcomesAllogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantStem cell transplantMyelodysplastic syndromePlatelet countPre-HCTMultivariable analysisUnivariable analysisRisk scoreHMA cyclesCytogenetic riskCell transplantHigh riskFour-year overall survivalDana-Farber Cancer InstituteSimplified prognostic modelHost disease (GVHD) prophylaxisReduced intensity conditioningNext-generation sequencingHigh-risk scoreRespective risk groupsResource limited settingsSpectrum From Clonal Hematopoiesis to Myelodysplastic Neoplasm/Syndromes and Other Myeloid Neoplasms
Xie Z, Chen E, Mendez L, Komrokji R, Zeidan A. Spectrum From Clonal Hematopoiesis to Myelodysplastic Neoplasm/Syndromes and Other Myeloid Neoplasms. The Cancer Journal 2023, 29: 130-137. PMID: 37195768, DOI: 10.1097/ppo.0000000000000656.Peer-Reviewed Reviews, Practice Guidelines, Standards, and Consensus StatementsConceptsClonal hematopoiesisHigh-risk patientsRisk of progressionSuch patientsUndetermined significanceAge-related diseasesHematologic malignanciesClonal cytopeniaMyeloid neoplasmsHigh riskUnmet needMyeloid malignanciesNatural historyCH managementPatientsMalignancySignificant knowledge gapsRiskHematopoiesisCytopeniasNeoplasmsSyndromeSecond malignancies among older patients with classical myeloproliferative neoplasms treated with hydroxyurea
Wang R, Shallis R, Stempel JM, Huntington SF, Zeidan AM, Gore SD, Ma X, Podoltsev NA. Second malignancies among older patients with classical myeloproliferative neoplasms treated with hydroxyurea. Blood Advances 2023, 7: 734-743. PMID: 35917456, PMCID: PMC9989521, DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022008259.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsSecond malignanciesAcute myeloid leukemiaOlder patientsMyelodysplastic syndromeMyeloproliferative neoplasmsHU usersHigh riskPolycythemia veraEssential thrombocythemiaRisk of SMAML/myelodysplastic syndromeClassical Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasmsImpact of hydroxyureaRetrospective cohort studyUse of hydroxyureaPhiladelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasmsClassical myeloproliferative neoplasmsCumulative incidence probabilityCohort studyCytoreductive therapyPatient characteristicsMedian ageHU useMyeloid leukemiaSecondary myelofibrosis
2022
Impact of Hypomethylating Agent Use on Hospital and Emergency Room Visits, and Predictors of Early Discontinuation in Patients With Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Zeidan AM, Joshi N, Kale H, Wang WJ, Corman S, Salimi T, Epstein RS. Impact of Hypomethylating Agent Use on Hospital and Emergency Room Visits, and Predictors of Early Discontinuation in Patients With Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes. Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia 2022, 22: 670-679. PMID: 35614009, DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2022.04.016.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsHigh-risk myelodysplastic syndromeHMA therapyPoor performance statusRate of hospitalizationSEER-Medicare databaseMyelodysplastic syndromeER visitsEarly discontinuationPerformance statusEmergency roomOlder agePredictors of discontinuationEmergency room visitsHigh-risk groupHigh economic burdenTreatment discontinuationExcess blastsMore hospitalizationsNew hospitalizationRefractory anemiaRoom visitsHigh riskDiscontinuationMD diagnosisAgent use
2019
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II Study of MBG453 Added to Hypomethylating Agents (HMAs) in Patients (pts) with Intermediate, High, or Very High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS): Stimulus-MDS1
Zeidan A, Miyazaki Y, Platzbecker U, Malek K, Niolat J, Kiertsman F, Fenaux P. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II Study of MBG453 Added to Hypomethylating Agents (HMAs) in Patients (pts) with Intermediate, High, or Very High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS): Stimulus-MDS1. Blood 2019, 134: 4259. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2019-127041.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLeukemia-free survivalProgression-free survivalAcute myeloid leukemiaHR-MDSMyelodysplastic syndromeOverall survivalHypomethylating agentTim-3Leukemic stem cellsClinical trialsHigh riskGood safety/tolerability profileInternational Working Group 2006 criteriaSolid tumorsDiagnosis of AMLAllogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantationMulticenter phase II clinical trialPrior treatmentAnti-Tim-3 antibodyIPSS-R risk categorySafety/tolerability profileCelgene CorporationTherapy-related myelodysplastic syndromeHigh-risk myelodysplastic syndromeInternational Prognostic Scoring System
2017
Lenalidomide use in myelodysplastic syndromes: Insights into the biologic mechanisms and clinical applications
Stahl M, Zeidan AM. Lenalidomide use in myelodysplastic syndromes: Insights into the biologic mechanisms and clinical applications. Cancer 2017, 123: 1703-1713. PMID: 28192601, DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30585.Peer-Reviewed Reviews, Practice Guidelines, Standards, and Consensus StatementsConceptsAcute myeloid leukemiaProlong survivalLow-risk MDSLR-MDS patientsEfficacy of lenalidomideImpressive clinical activityRecent clinical dataClonal myeloid neoplasmsMechanism of actionBlood cytopeniasConventional careTransfusion independenceCytogenetic responseClinical activityMyeloid leukemiaClinical dataIneffective hematopoiesisMyeloid neoplasmsDelay progressionHigh riskLenalidomidePatientsVariable riskHeterogeneous groupProgression
2015
Patterns of Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis During Treatment of Acute Leukemia: Results of a North American Web-Based Survey
Lee EJ, Smith BD, Merrey JW, Lee AI, Podoltsev NA, Barbarotta L, Litzow MR, Prebet T, Luger SM, Gore S, Streiff MB, Zeidan AM. Patterns of Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis During Treatment of Acute Leukemia: Results of a North American Web-Based Survey. Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia 2015, 15: 766-770.e4. PMID: 26363982, PMCID: PMC4663156, DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2015.07.637.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsVenous thromboembolismAcute leukemiaVTE prophylaxisPrevention of VTEPharmacologic VTE prophylaxisVenous thromboembolism prophylaxisEvidence-based guidelinesHigh-quality studiesConsolidation therapyPharmacologic prophylaxisThromboembolism prophylaxisNorth American providersVTE preventionSignificant morbidityProspective studyPatient populationHigh riskProphylaxisLower riskResponse ratePatientsWeb-based surveyLeukemiaSpectrum of practicesAmerican providers