2024
‘Case of the Month’ from The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA: ependymoma of the urinary bladder
Myers A, Tan W, de Groot J, Westney O, Kamat A. ‘Case of the Month’ from The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA: ependymoma of the urinary bladder. BJU International 2024, 134: 45-47. PMID: 38379218, DOI: 10.1111/bju.16302.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchInfluence of lamina propria invasion extension on T1 high‐grade non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer in patients undergoing BCG or radical cystectomy
Contieri R, Tan W, Grajales V, Hensley P, Martini A, Bree K, Myers A, Nogueras‐Gonzalez G, Navai N, Dinney C, Guo C, Kamat A. Influence of lamina propria invasion extension on T1 high‐grade non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer in patients undergoing BCG or radical cystectomy. BJU International 2024, 133: 733-741. PMID: 38374533, DOI: 10.1111/bju.16293.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsNon-muscle-invasive bladder cancerImmediate radical cystectomyCancer-specific survivalMetastasis-free survivalProgression-free survivalT1 substagingOverall survivalRadical cystectomyPathology reportsBladder cancerHigh-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancerPatients treated with bacillus Calmette-GuerinAssociated with poor progression-free survivalInstitutional review board-approved retrospective studyPatients treated with BCGPoor progression-free survivalLamina propriaAssociated with upstagingBCG-treated patientsCalculate overall survivalTreated with BCGKaplan-Meier methodHigh-grade patientsMultivariate Cox modelInvasive characteristics
2023
Symptomatic benefits of testosterone treatment in patient subgroups: a systematic review, individual participant data meta-analysis, and aggregate data meta-analysis
Hudson J, Cruickshank M, Quinton R, Aucott L, Wu F, Grossmann M, Bhasin S, Snyder P, Ellenberg S, Travison T, Brock G, Gianatti E, van der Schouw Y, Emmelot-Vonk M, Giltay E, Hackett G, Ramachandran S, Svartberg J, Hildreth K, Antonic K, Tenover J, Tan H, Ho Chee Kong C, Tan W, Marks L, Ross R, Schwartz R, Manson P, Roberts S, Skovsager Andersen M, Velling Magnussen L, Aceves-Martins M, Gillies K, Hernández R, Oliver N, Dhillo W, Bhattacharya S, Brazzelli M, Jayasena C. Symptomatic benefits of testosterone treatment in patient subgroups: a systematic review, individual participant data meta-analysis, and aggregate data meta-analysis. The Lancet Healthy Longevity 2023, 4: e561-e572. PMID: 37804846, DOI: 10.1016/s2666-7568(23)00169-1.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsBenefits of testosterone treatmentData meta-analysisParticipant data meta-analysisSerum total testosteroneBaseline serum total testosteroneMild erectile dysfunctionTestosterone treatmentParticipant dataMeta-analysisPatient ageIIEF-15Sexual functionTotal testosteroneErectile dysfunctionSymptomatic benefitLow testosteroneSerum total testosterone concentrationsAging Male Symptoms ScoreSystematic reviewBaseline serum testosteroneHealth Technology Assessment programmeOlder menIIEF-15 scoreTestosterone replacement therapyMinimal clinically important difference
2022
Adverse cardiovascular events and mortality in men during testosterone treatment: an individual patient and aggregate data meta-analysis
Hudson J, Cruickshank M, Quinton R, Aucott L, Aceves-Martins M, Gillies K, Bhasin S, Snyder P, Ellenberg S, Grossmann M, Travison T, Gianatti E, van der Schouw Y, Emmelot-Vonk M, Giltay E, Hackett G, Ramachandran S, Svartberg J, Hildreth K, Antonic K, Brock G, Tenover J, Tan H, Kong C, Tan W, Marks L, Ross R, Schwartz R, Manson P, Roberts S, Andersen M, Magnussen L, Hernández R, Oliver N, Wu F, Dhillo W, Bhattacharya S, Brazzelli M, Jayasena C. Adverse cardiovascular events and mortality in men during testosterone treatment: an individual patient and aggregate data meta-analysis. The Lancet Healthy Longevity 2022, 3: e381-e393. PMID: 35711614, PMCID: PMC9184259, DOI: 10.1016/s2666-7568(22)00096-4.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRisk of biasMeta-analysisStudy designSystematic reviewInclusion criteriaCochrane Database of Systematic ReviewsCochrane risk of bias toolDatabase of Systematic ReviewsRisk of bias toolMEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed CitationsIn-Process & Other Non-Indexed CitationsTwo-stage meta-analysisCharacteristics of interventionsOther Non-Indexed CitationsMeta-analysis of randomised controlled trialsOne-stage meta-analysisFull-text screeningRandomised controlled trialsNon-Indexed CitationsCardiovascular eventsAggregate data meta-analysisCoronary heart diseaseData meta-analysisPeer-reviewed publicationsCochrane Controlled Trials RegisterRetzius-sparing technique independently predicts early recovery of urinary continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
Kadhim H, Ang K, Tan W, Nathan A, Pavan N, Mazzon G, Al-Kadhi O, Di G, Dinneen E, Briggs T, Kelkar A, Rajan P, Nathan S, Kelly J, Sooriakumaran P, Sridhar A. Retzius-sparing technique independently predicts early recovery of urinary continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Journal Of Robotic Surgery 2022, 16: 1419-1426. PMID: 35192106, DOI: 10.1007/s11701-022-01383-z.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRobot-assisted radical prostatectomySocial urinary continenceBody mass indexNeurovascular bundle sparingRetzius-sparing techniqueRS-RARPUrinary continenceNeurovascular bundleRadical prostatectomyEarly recovery of urinary continenceRecovery of urinary continenceMedian body mass indexMultivariate logistic regression analysisMembranous urethral lengthLocalised prostate cancerHigh-volume institutionsSurgical treatment optionsFollow-up dataLogistic regression analysisConsecutive patientsAssociated with recoveryPad useUrethral lengthMedian ageProstate cancer
2021
Recovery of health‐related quality of life in patients undergoing robot‐assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal diversion
Abozaid M, Tan W, Khetrapal P, Baker H, Duncan J, Sridhar A, Briggs T, Selim M, Abdallah M, Elmahdy A, Elserafy F, Kelly J. Recovery of health‐related quality of life in patients undergoing robot‐assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal diversion. BJU International 2021, 129: 72-79. PMID: 34092021, DOI: 10.1111/bju.15505.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsGlobal HRQoL scoreHealth-related quality of lifeRobot-assisted radical cystectomyEORTC QLQ-C30HRQoL scoresQuality of lifeSexual functionRadical cystectomyUrinary diversionIleal conduitIC patientsRecovery of health-related quality of lifeFunction scoresClavien-Dindo complicationsHealth-related qualityPhysical function scoresRehabilitation of sexual functionIntracorporeal urinary diversionLongitudinal analysisSexual function scoresEuropean Organisation for ResearchMonths follow-upEORTC QLQ-BLM30Higher sexual function scoresReturn to baselineIs there still a role for digital rectal examination in the prostate cancer diagnostic pathway in the COVID-19 and post COVID-19 era?
Tan W, Wong A, Mahmalji W, Raza A. Is there still a role for digital rectal examination in the prostate cancer diagnostic pathway in the COVID-19 and post COVID-19 era? The Aging Male 2021, 24: 92-94. PMID: 34319201, DOI: 10.1080/13685538.2020.1786047.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsDigital rectal examinationProstate cancer diagnostic pathwayProstate specific antigenSuspicion of prostate cancerCancer diagnostic pathwayDiagnostic pathwayProstate cancerRectal examinationClinical suspicion of prostate cancerAbnormal digital rectal examinationProstate specific antigen measurementsRaised prostate specific antigenReferral to secondary careClinical suspicionSpecific antigenClinical examinationClinical assessmentCOVID-19 eraCancerMRISecondary careCOVID-19ExaminationRadiology servicesCoronavirus-19
2020
Evaluation of the New American Urological Association Guidelines Risk Classification for Hematuria
Woldu S, Ng C, Loo R, Slezak J, Jacobsen S, Tan W, Kelly J, Lough T, Darling D, van Kessel K, de Jong J, van Criekinge W, Shariat S, Hiar A, Brown S, Boorjian S, Barocas D, Svatek R, Lotan Y. Evaluation of the New American Urological Association Guidelines Risk Classification for Hematuria. Journal Of Urology 2020, 205: 1387-1392. PMID: 33356483, DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000001550.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsIncidence of bladder cancerBladder cancerHigh-risk groupRisk groupsRisk strataCancer incidenceDegree of hematuriaHigh-risk patientsRisk stratification systemAmerican Urological AssociationEvaluation of patientsMultinational cohort studyRisk-stratified approachBladder cancer incidenceHematuria patientsClinically meaningful categoriesGross hematuriaUrologic evaluationIntermediate riskProspective registryRisk patientsContemporary patientsSmoking historyUrological AssociationHematuriaMorbidity and mortality after robot‐assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion in octogenarians: results from the European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group
Mortezavi A, Crippa A, Edeling S, Pokupic S, Dell’Oglio P, Montorsi F, D'Hondt F, Mottrie A, Decaestecker K, Wijburg C, Collins J, Kelly J, Tan W, Sridhar A, John H, Canda A, Schwentner C, Rönmark E, Wiklund P, Hosseini A. Morbidity and mortality after robot‐assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion in octogenarians: results from the European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group. BJU International 2020, 127: 585-595. PMID: 33058469, PMCID: PMC8246851, DOI: 10.1111/bju.15274.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPatients aged <Intracorporeal urinary diversionCancer-specific mortalityOther-cause mortalityPostoperative complicationsRadical cystectomyMortality rateUrinary diversionBladder cancerOutcomes of patients aged <Predictor of high-grade complicationsHigh-grade complication rateOther-cause mortality ratesRobot-assisted radical cystectomyMultivariate logistic regression analysisClavien-Dindo gradeLaparoscopic radical cystectomyHigh-grade complicationsPostoperative mortality rateMinimally invasive approachTreatment-related risksLogistic regression analysisOCM ratesPostoperative variablesComplication rateDelayed blood transfusion is associated with mortality following radical cystectomy
Tan W, Wang Y, Trinh Q, Preston M, Kelly J, Hrouda D, Kibel A, Krasnow R, Liu J, Chung B, Chang S, Mossanen M. Delayed blood transfusion is associated with mortality following radical cystectomy. Scandinavian Journal Of Urology 2020, 54: 290-296. PMID: 32538224, DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2020.1777195.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsDelayed blood transfusionEarly blood transfusionBlood transfusionRadical cystectomyBladder cancer treated with radical cystectomyPatients treated with radical cystectomyAssociated with 90-day mortalityIncreased 90-day mortalityTime of blood transfusionPrimary end pointRetrospective cohort studyMultivariate logistic regressionAssociated with mortalityDelayed transfusionMedian ageClinical deteriorationCystectomyHigher CCIOlder patientsTransfusionCohort studyEnd pointsPatient mortalityPatientsIndex admissionPrimary Urethral Tuberculosis With Urethrocutaneous Fistula in Association With Balanitis Xerotica Obliterans
Mukherjee S, Sinha R, Mandal S, Tan W. Primary Urethral Tuberculosis With Urethrocutaneous Fistula in Association With Balanitis Xerotica Obliterans. Urology 2020, 141: e20-e21. PMID: 32325139, DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.04.035.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchInequity in selective referral to high-volume hospitals for genitourinary malignancies
Berg S, Tully K, Sahraoui A, Tan W, Krimphove M, Marchese M, Lipsitz S, Noldus J, Trinh Q. Inequity in selective referral to high-volume hospitals for genitourinary malignancies. Urologic Oncology Seminars And Original Investigations 2020, 38: 582-589. PMID: 32217041, DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.02.013.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsHigh-volume hospitalsBladder cancerPredictors of treatmentCancer patientsRadical prostatectomyProstate cancerMuscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancerNegative predictors of treatmentBlack raceNational Cancer DatabaseNonmetastatic prostate cancerUrothelial bladder cancerProstate cancer patientsBladder cancer patientsMultivariate logistic regression modelAssociated with lower ratesKidney cancer patientsPrivate insurance statusAssociated with lower oddsAssociated with greater oddsLow-volume hospitalsRadical cystectomyReceipt of treatmentGenitourinary malignanciesPerioperative morbidityExploring patients’ experience and perception of being diagnosed with bladder cancer: a mixed‐methods approach
Tan W, Teo C, Chan D, Ang K, Heinrich M, Feber A, Sarpong R, Williams N, Brew‐Graves C, Ng C, Kelly J, Khetrapal P, Sridhar A, Baker H, Ocampo F, Whotton N, Dent K, Pearson S, Hatton J, Newton M, Heeney E, Green K, Evans S, Rogers M, Dann A, Cook J, Cornwell M, Mills R, Knight H, Maher S, Rane A, Thomas S, Reyner S, Vallejera G, Adeniran P, Masood S, Ridgway S, Coulding M, Savill H, Mccormick J, Clark M, Collins G, Jewers K, Keith S, Bowen G, Hargreaves J, Riley K, Srirangam S, Mistry R, Chadwick J, Cocks S, Hull R, Loftus A, Dawson L, Roberts H, Main C, Jain S, Waymont C, Rogers J, Grant A, Carter V, Heap H, Lomas C, Cooke P, Baird Y, Moore S, Greenslade S, Margalef J, Chadbourn I, Harris M, Hicks J, Clitheroe P, Connolly S, Hodgkinson S, Haydock H, Sinclair A, Storr E, Cogley L, Natale S, Lovegrove W, Smith S, Smith K, Hewitt D, Sriram R, Atkinson K, Royle L, Madine J, MacLean K, Walsh J, Guerdette A, Hill M, Payne D, Power A, Cannon J, Devereaux L, Thompson A, Scarratt L, Hodgkiss T, Johnstone D, Johnson J, Allsop J, Rothwell J, Connolly K, Cherian J, Wardle H, Wilson D, Bayles A, Pelluri S, Pati J, Gherman A, Scott C, Madaan S, Taylor J, Edmunds E, Moore J, Rees A, Williams S, Caddy S, Dukes S, Goffe A, Buckhorn K, Nichols L, Acher P, Baillie K, Middleton K, Proctor C, Cresswell J, Chilvers A, Cain M, Vaux A, Watson D, Bradfield S, Gregory H, Mostafid H, Kehoe L, Drakeley S, Davies J, Williamson L, Krishnan R, Lunt N, Hill P, Burns H, Townley B, Wilkinson L, Wassall H, Sinclair A, Hunt J, Holbrook B, Stancombe L, Morrison J, Vankoutrik L, Misra S, Fossey G, Richards A, Mcdonald K, Henderson A, Fennelly R, Tribbeck M, Ames K, Borwell J, Kotze M, Beesley K, Rennie K, Porter T, Gipson A, Piper L, Bailey L, Chrisopoulou A, Slevin K, McCartin F, Warburton H, Hathaway‐Lees S, Whetton K, Delves G, Day A, Bankole T, Broadhead S, Malde S, Oblak M, Ellis D, Bishara S, Barias‐Lara T, Donkov I, Thatcher H, Morris H, Culmsee C, Menzies A, Bartlett C, Cutting C, O'Brien N, Jannapureddy R, Kelkar A, Fitzgerald J, Longhurst S, Worth C, Peracha A, Mzazi S, Poile C, Griffiths L, Cook A, Barber N, Brar N, Alty A, Zelhof B, Blades R. Exploring patients’ experience and perception of being diagnosed with bladder cancer: a mixed‐methods approach. BJU International 2020, 125: 669-678. PMID: 31975539, PMCID: PMC7318301, DOI: 10.1111/bju.15008.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsNon-muscle-invasive bladder cancer diagnosisPatient experienceNon-muscle-invasive bladder cancerTransurethral resection of bladder tumorCancer diagnosisBrief IPQMixed-methods approachBrief Illness Perception QuestionnaireCause of bladder cancerRisk of bladder cancerMental health of patientsIllness Perception QuestionnairePersonal controlBladder cancerHealth of patientsSemi-structured interviewsPerception of disease controlLow personal controlMental healthProspective multicentre observational studyPsychological supportUrine biomarker studiesPerception QuestionnaireDiagnosis of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancerPoor perception
2019
Delayed nephrectomy has comparable long-term overall survival to immediate nephrectomy for cT1a renal cell carcinoma: A population-based analysis
Tan W, Trinh Q, Hayn M, Marchese M, Lipsitz S, Nabi J, Kilbridge K, Vale J, Khoubehi B, Kibel A, Sun M, Chang S, Sammon J. Delayed nephrectomy has comparable long-term overall survival to immediate nephrectomy for cT1a renal cell carcinoma: A population-based analysis. Urologic Oncology Seminars And Original Investigations 2019, 38: 74.e13-74.e20. PMID: 31864937, DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.11.008.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRenal cell carcinomaCT1a renal cell carcinomaImmediate nephrectomyKaplan-Meier curvesOverall survivalCell carcinomaSurgical resectionRenal massesPatient ageTreatment armsCharlson Comorbidity Index 0Compare OS of patientsLong-term overall survivalInfluence of patient ageCox proportional hazards regression analysisEarly surgical resectionLong-term OSMedian patient ageProportional hazards regression analysisMedian follow-upNational Cancer DatabaseOS of patientsSmall renal massesInverse probabilityRecommended treatment optionEffects of Bladder Cancer on UK Healthcare Costs and Patient Health-Related Quality of Life: Evidence From the BOXIT Trial
Cox E, Saramago P, Kelly J, Porta N, Hall E, Tan W, Sculpher M, Soares M. Effects of Bladder Cancer on UK Healthcare Costs and Patient Health-Related Quality of Life: Evidence From the BOXIT Trial. Clinical Genitourinary Cancer 2019, 18: e418-e442. PMID: 32144049, PMCID: PMC7427321, DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.12.004.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsHealth-related quality of lifeNon-muscle-invasive bladder cancerMuscle-invasive bladder cancerProgression to muscle-invasive bladder cancerQuality of lifePatients' health-related quality of lifePatients' health-related qualityBladder cancerHealth-related qualityEQ-5D-3LGeneralized estimating equationsUK unit costsRandomized controlled trialsHRQoL decrementNon-muscle-invasive bladder cancer patientsHRQoLHealthcare costsHRQOL effectsLimited evidenceControlled trialsEstimating equationsTMN classificationClinical eventsAverage costRecurrenceVariation in Positive Surgical Margin Status After Radical Prostatectomy for pT2 Prostate Cancer
Tan W, Krimphove M, Cole A, Marchese M, Berg S, Lipsitz S, Löppenberg B, Nabi J, Abdollah F, Choueiri T, Kibel A, Sooriakumaran P, Trinh Q. Variation in Positive Surgical Margin Status After Radical Prostatectomy for pT2 Prostate Cancer. Clinical Genitourinary Cancer 2019, 17: e1060-e1068. PMID: 31303561, DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.06.008.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPositive surgical marginsFactors associated with positive surgical marginsPositive surgical margin statusPT2 prostate cancerRadical prostatectomyProstate cancerCancer-specific factorsSurgical approachMargin statusHigher hospital surgical volumeSurgical margin statusNational Cancer DatabaseHospital surgical volumeCancer-specific featuresPSM rateSurgical marginsCancer DatabaseImprove patient outcomesEvaluating patientsContribution of patientLogistic regression modelsSurgical volumeProstatectomyPatientsPatient-specificPathological Findings and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Concordance at Salvage Radical Prostatectomy for Local Recurrence following Partial Ablation Using High Intensity Focused Ultrasound.
Thompson J, Sridhar A, Tan W, Freeman A, Haider A, Allen C, Moore C, Orczyk C, Mazzon G, Khetrapal P, Shaw G, Rajan P, Mohammed A, Briggs T, Nathan S, Kelly J, Sooriakumaran P. Pathological Findings and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Concordance at Salvage Radical Prostatectomy for Local Recurrence following Partial Ablation Using High Intensity Focused Ultrasound. Journal Of Urology 2019, 201: 1134-1143. PMID: 30730409, DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000000135.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsSalvage robot-assisted radical prostatectomyRobot-assisted radical prostatectomyPositive surgical marginsSalvage prostatectomyRadical prostatectomySensitivity of magnetic resonance imagingField recurrenceMagnetic resonance imagingInfield recurrenceSurgical marginsHigher risk of positive surgical marginsGleason 3+3 diseasePrimary robotic assisted radical prostatectomyRisk of positive surgical marginsMagnetic resonance imaging concordancePositive surgical margin ratePartial ablationSalvage radical prostatectomyMagnetic resonance imaging sensitivityResonance imagingSurgical margin rateRisk of recurrenceCharacteristics of recurrenceProstatectomy histopathologyHigh-intensity focused ultrasoundExamining the relationship between complications and perioperative mortality following radical cystectomy: a population‐based analysis
Mossanen M, Krasnow R, Zlatev D, Tan W, Preston M, Trinh Q, Kibel A, Sonpavde G, Schrag D, Chung B, Chang S. Examining the relationship between complications and perioperative mortality following radical cystectomy: a population‐based analysis. BJU International 2019, 124: 40-46. PMID: 30499636, DOI: 10.1111/bju.14636.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRadical cystectomyPerioperative mortalityPostoperative mortalityIncidence of perioperative complicationsTreated with RCPremier Healthcare DatabaseNature of complicationsIncreasing predicted probabilityOdds of mortalityProbability of mortalityReadmission complicationsRenal-relatedSurgical characteristicsPerioperative complicationsBladder cancerPrimary outcomeComplicationsHealthcare databasesPatientsMortalityCystectomyMultivariate regressionReadmissionHospitalisationHospitalMixed‐methods approach to exploring patients’ perspectives on the acceptability of a urinary biomarker test in replacing cystoscopy for bladder cancer surveillance
Tan W, Teo C, Chan D, Heinrich M, Feber A, Sarpong R, Allan J, Williams N, Brew‐Graves C, Ng C, Kelly J, Khetrapal P, ridhar A, Baker H, Ocampo F, Whotton N, Dent K, Pearson S, Hatton J, Newton M, Heeney E, Green K, Evans S, Rogers M, Dann A, Cook J, Cornwell M, Mills R, Knight H, Maher S, Rane A, Thomas S, Reyner S, Vallejera G, Adeniran P, Masood S, Ridgway S, Coulding M, Savill H, Mccormick J, Clark M, Collins G, Jewers K, Keith S, Bowen G, Hargreaves J, Riley K, Srirangam S, Mistry R, Chadwick J, Cocks S, Hull R, Loftus A, Dawson L, Roberts H, Main C, Jain S, Waymont C, Rogers J, Grant A, Carter V, Heap H, Lomas C, Cooke P, Baird Y, Moore S, Greenslade S, Margalef J, Chadbourn I, Harris M, Hicks J, Clitheroe P, Connolly S, Hodgkinson S, Haydock H, inclair A, Storr E, Cogley L, Natale S, Lovegrove W, Smith S, Smith K, Hewitt D, Sriram R, Atkinson K, Royle L, Madine J, MacLean K, Walsh J, Guerdette M, Hill M, Payne D, Power A, Cannon J, Devereaux L, Thompson A, Scarratt L, Hodgkiss T, Johnstone D, Johnson J, Allsop J, Rothwell J, Connolly K, Cherian J, Wardle H, Wilson D, Bayles A, Pelluri S, Pati J, Gherman A, Scott C, Madaan S, Taylor A, Edmunds E, Moore J, Rees A, Williams S, Caddy S, Dukes S, Goffe A, Buckhorn K, Nichols L, Acher P, Baillie K, Middleton K, Proctor C, Cresswell J, Chilvers A, Cain M, Vaux A, Watson D, Bradfield S, Gregory H, Mostafid H, Kehoe L, Drakeley S, Davies A, Williamson L, Krishnan R, Lunt N, Hill P, Burns H, Townley B, Wilkinson L, Wassall H, Hunt J, Holbrook B, Stancombe L, Morrison J, Vankoutrik L, Misra S, Fossey G, Richards A, Mcdonald K, Henderson A, Fennelly R, Tribbeck M, Ames K, Borwell J, Kotze M, Beesley K, Rennie K, Porter T, Gipson A, Piper L, Bailey L, Chrisopoulou A, Slevin K, McCartin F, Warburton H, Hathaway‐Lees S, Whetton K, Delves G, Day A, Bankole T, Broadhead S, Malde S, Oblak M, Ellis D, Bishara S, Barias‐Lara T, Donkov I, Thatcher H, Morris M, Culmsee C, Menzies H, Bartlett C, Cutting C, O'Brien N, Jannapureddy R, Kelkar A, Fitzgerald J, Longhurst S, Worth C, Peracha M, Mzazi S, Poile C, Griffiths L, Cook A, Barber N, Brar N, lty A, Zelhof B, Blades R. Mixed‐methods approach to exploring patients’ perspectives on the acceptability of a urinary biomarker test in replacing cystoscopy for bladder cancer surveillance. BJU International 2019, 124: 408-417. PMID: 30694612, PMCID: PMC6767410, DOI: 10.1111/bju.14690.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMinimally acceptable sensitivityAdverse eventsMixed-methods approachUrine biomarkersUrinary biomarkersProspective multicentre observational studyUrinary biomarker testsUrinary tract symptomsHome to hospitalAssociated with adverse eventsUrinary tract infectionHigh-risk patientsMulticentre observational studySensitivity of cystoscopyBladder cancer surveillanceDiagnosis of cancerSemi-structured interviewsPrevalence of haematuriaPatient experiencePatient perspectivePatients' viewsCancer surveillanceTract infectionsUrine biomarker studiesPatient demographicsDevelopment and validation of a haematuria cancer risk score to identify patients at risk of harbouring cancer
Tan W, Ahmad A, Feber A, Mostafid H, Cresswell J, Fankhauser C, Waisbrod S, Hermanns T, Sasieni P, Kelly J, Khetrapal P, Baker H, Sridhar A, Lamb B, Ocampo F, McBain H, Baillie K, Middleton K, Watson D, Knight H, Maher S, Rane A, Pathmanathan B, Harmathova A, Hellawell G, Pelluri S, Pati J, Cossons A, Scott C, Madaan S, Bradfield S, Wakeford N, Dann A, Cook J, Cornwell M, Mills R, Thomas S, Reyner S, Vallejera G, Adeniran P, Masood S, Whotton N, Dent K, Pearson S, Hatton J, Newton M, Heeney E, Green K, Evans S, Rogers M, Gupwell K, Whiteley S, Brown A, McGrath J, Lunt N, Hill P, Sinclair A, Paredes‐Guerra A, Holbrook B, Ong E, Wardle H, Wilson D, Bayles A, Fennelly R, Tribbeck M, Ames K, Davies M, Taylor J, Edmunds E, Moore J, Mckinley S, Nolan T, Speed A, Tunnicliff A, Fossey G, Williams A, George M, Hutchins I, Einosas R, Richards A, Henderson A, Appleby B, Kehoe L, Gladwell L, Drakeley S, Davies J, Krishnan R, Roberts H, Main C, Jain S, Dumville J, Wilkinson N, Taylor J, Thomas F, Goulden K, Vinod C, Green E, Waymont C, Rogers J, Grant A, Carter V, Heap H, Lomas C, Cooke P, Scarratt L, Hodgkiss T, Johnstone D, Johnson J, Allsop J, Rothwell J, Connolly K, Cherian J, Ridgway S, Coulding M, Savill H, Mccormick J, Clark M, Collins G, Jewers K, Keith S, Bowen G, Hargreaves J, Riley K, Srirangam S, Rees A, Williams S, Dukes S, Goffe A, Dawson L, Mistry R, Chadwick J, Cocks S, Hull R, Loftus A, Baird Y, Moore S, Greenslade S, Margalef J, Chadbourn I, Harris M, Hicks J, Clitheroe P, Connolly S, Hodgkinson S, Haydock H, Sinclair A, Storr E, Cogley L, Natale S, Lovegrove W, Slack K, Nash D, Smith K, Walsh J, Guerdette A, Hill M, Payne D, Taylor B, Sinclair E, Perry M, Debbarma M, Hewitt D, Sriram R, Power A, Cannon J, Devereaux L, Thompson A, Atkinson K, Royle L, Madine J, MacLean K, Sarpong R, Brew‐Graves C, Williams N. Development and validation of a haematuria cancer risk score to identify patients at risk of harbouring cancer. Journal Of Internal Medicine 2019, 285: 436-445. PMID: 30521125, PMCID: PMC6446724, DOI: 10.1111/joim.12868.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCancer risk scoreNational Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guidelinesRisk scoreInvestigation of haematuriaPhysician decision-makingAge-specific thresholdsValidation cohortExcellence guidelinesUK hospitalsAmerican Urological Association guidelinesNational guidelinesImprove patientNo significant overfittingImprove patient selectionUpper tract cancerLack of consensusAssociation guidelinesSmoking historySwiss patientsCohortPatient ageDevelopment cohortPatient selectionGuidelinesHaematuria