2020
Evaluation of the New American Urological Association Guidelines Risk Classification for Hematuria
Woldu S, Ng C, Loo R, Slezak J, Jacobsen S, Tan W, Kelly J, Lough T, Darling D, van Kessel K, de Jong J, van Criekinge W, Shariat S, Hiar A, Brown S, Boorjian S, Barocas D, Svatek R, Lotan Y. Evaluation of the New American Urological Association Guidelines Risk Classification for Hematuria. Journal Of Urology 2020, 205: 1387-1392. PMID: 33356483, DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000001550.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsIncidence of bladder cancerBladder cancerHigh-risk groupRisk groupsRisk strataCancer incidenceDegree of hematuriaHigh-risk patientsRisk stratification systemAmerican Urological AssociationEvaluation of patientsMultinational cohort studyRisk-stratified approachBladder cancer incidenceHematuria patientsClinically meaningful categoriesGross hematuriaUrologic evaluationIntermediate riskProspective registryRisk patientsContemporary patientsSmoking historyUrological AssociationHematuria
2019
Non-visible haematuria for the Detection of Bladder, Upper Tract, and Kidney Cancer: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Jubber I, Shariat S, Conroy S, Tan W, Gordon P, Lotan Y, Messing E, Stenzl A, Rhijn B, Kelly J, Catto J, Cumberbatch M. Non-visible haematuria for the Detection of Bladder, Upper Tract, and Kidney Cancer: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. European Urology 2019, 77: 583-598. PMID: 31791622, DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.10.010.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsNon-visible haematuriaUpper tract urothelial carcinomaMeta-analysisSystematic reviewKidney cancerSystematic review of original articlesUrological cancersRisk of cancerIncidence of cancerReview of original articlesCancer detection rateRe-evaluation of patientsPublic health implicationsBladder cancerNarrative synthesisDiagnosis of BCInclusion criteriaMeta-analysesCigarette smokingHealth implicationsDiagnosis of bladder cancerMale sexEstimated riskHigh-risk patientsGroup of individualsDevelopment and validation of a haematuria cancer risk score to identify patients at risk of harbouring cancer
Tan W, Ahmad A, Feber A, Mostafid H, Cresswell J, Fankhauser C, Waisbrod S, Hermanns T, Sasieni P, Kelly J, Khetrapal P, Baker H, Sridhar A, Lamb B, Ocampo F, McBain H, Baillie K, Middleton K, Watson D, Knight H, Maher S, Rane A, Pathmanathan B, Harmathova A, Hellawell G, Pelluri S, Pati J, Cossons A, Scott C, Madaan S, Bradfield S, Wakeford N, Dann A, Cook J, Cornwell M, Mills R, Thomas S, Reyner S, Vallejera G, Adeniran P, Masood S, Whotton N, Dent K, Pearson S, Hatton J, Newton M, Heeney E, Green K, Evans S, Rogers M, Gupwell K, Whiteley S, Brown A, McGrath J, Lunt N, Hill P, Sinclair A, Paredes‐Guerra A, Holbrook B, Ong E, Wardle H, Wilson D, Bayles A, Fennelly R, Tribbeck M, Ames K, Davies M, Taylor J, Edmunds E, Moore J, Mckinley S, Nolan T, Speed A, Tunnicliff A, Fossey G, Williams A, George M, Hutchins I, Einosas R, Richards A, Henderson A, Appleby B, Kehoe L, Gladwell L, Drakeley S, Davies J, Krishnan R, Roberts H, Main C, Jain S, Dumville J, Wilkinson N, Taylor J, Thomas F, Goulden K, Vinod C, Green E, Waymont C, Rogers J, Grant A, Carter V, Heap H, Lomas C, Cooke P, Scarratt L, Hodgkiss T, Johnstone D, Johnson J, Allsop J, Rothwell J, Connolly K, Cherian J, Ridgway S, Coulding M, Savill H, Mccormick J, Clark M, Collins G, Jewers K, Keith S, Bowen G, Hargreaves J, Riley K, Srirangam S, Rees A, Williams S, Dukes S, Goffe A, Dawson L, Mistry R, Chadwick J, Cocks S, Hull R, Loftus A, Baird Y, Moore S, Greenslade S, Margalef J, Chadbourn I, Harris M, Hicks J, Clitheroe P, Connolly S, Hodgkinson S, Haydock H, Sinclair A, Storr E, Cogley L, Natale S, Lovegrove W, Slack K, Nash D, Smith K, Walsh J, Guerdette A, Hill M, Payne D, Taylor B, Sinclair E, Perry M, Debbarma M, Hewitt D, Sriram R, Power A, Cannon J, Devereaux L, Thompson A, Atkinson K, Royle L, Madine J, MacLean K, Sarpong R, Brew‐Graves C, Williams N. Development and validation of a haematuria cancer risk score to identify patients at risk of harbouring cancer. Journal Of Internal Medicine 2019, 285: 436-445. PMID: 30521125, PMCID: PMC6446724, DOI: 10.1111/joim.12868.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCancer risk scoreNational Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guidelinesRisk scoreInvestigation of haematuriaPhysician decision-makingAge-specific thresholdsValidation cohortExcellence guidelinesUK hospitalsAmerican Urological Association guidelinesNational guidelinesImprove patientNo significant overfittingImprove patient selectionUpper tract cancerLack of consensusAssociation guidelinesSmoking historySwiss patientsCohortPatient ageDevelopment cohortPatient selectionGuidelinesHaematuria
2018
Does urinary cytology have a role in haematuria investigations?
Tan W, Sarpong R, Khetrapal P, Rodney S, Mostafid H, Cresswell J, Watson D, Rane A, Hicks J, Hellawell G, Davies M, Srirangam S, Dawson L, Payne D, Williams N, Brew‐Graves C, Feber A, Kelly J, Sridhar A, Lamb B, Ocampo F, McBain H, Baillie K, Middleton K, Knight H, Maher S, Pathmanathan B, Harmathova A, Pelluri S, Pati J, Cossons A, Scott C, Madaan S, Bradfield S, Wakeford N, Dann, Cook J, Cornwell M, Mills R, Thomas, Reyner S, Vallejera G, Adeniran P, Masood S, Whotton N, Dent K, Pearson S, Hatton J, Newton M, Hheeney E, Green K, Evans S, Rogers M, Gupwell K, ley S, Brown A, McGrath J, Lunt N, Hill P, inclair A, Paredes‐Guerra A, Holbrook B, Ong E, Wardle H, Wilson D, Bayles A, Fennelly R, Tribbeck M, Ames K, Taylor J, Edmunds E, Moore J, Mckinley S, Nolan T, peed A, Tunnicliff A, Fossey G, Williams A, George M, Hutchins I, Einosas R, Richards A, Henderson A, Appleby B, Kehoe L, Gladwell L, Drakeley S, Davies J, Krishnan R, Roberts H, Main C, Jain S, Dumville J, Wilkinson N, Taylor J, Thomas F, Goulden K, Vinod C, Green E, Waymont C, Rogers J, Grant A, Carter V, Heap H, Lomas C, Cooke P, Scarratt L, Hodgkiss T, Johnstone D, Johnson J, Allsop J, Rothwell J, Connolly K, Cherian J, Ridgway S, Coulding M, Savill H, Mccormick J, Clark M, Collins G, Jewers K, Keith S, Bowen G, Hargreaves J, Riley K, Rees A, Williams S, Dukes S, Goffe A, Mistry R, Chadwick J, Cocks S, Hull R, oftus A, Baird Y, Moore S, Greenslade S, Margalef J, Chadbourn I, Harris M, Clitheroe P, Connolly S, Hodgkinson S, Haydock H, Storr E, Cogley L, Natale S, Lovegrove W, Slack K, Nash D, Smith K, Walsh J, Guerdette A, Hill M, Taylor B, Sinclair E, Perry M, Debbarma M, Hewitt D, Sriram R, Power A, Cannon J, Devereaux L, Thompson A, Atkinson K, Royle L, Madine J, MacLean K. Does urinary cytology have a role in haematuria investigations? BJU International 2018, 123: 74-81. PMID: 30003675, PMCID: PMC6334509, DOI: 10.1111/bju.14459.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedCarcinoma, Transitional CellFalse Negative ReactionsFalse Positive ReactionsFemaleHematuriaHumansKidney NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonographyUreteral NeoplasmsUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsUrineUrographyConceptsUpper tract urothelial cancerPositive urine cytologyAccuracy of urinary cytologyDiagnosis of bladder cancerUrine cytologyHigh-risk cancerNegative predictive valuePositive predictive valueBladder cancerHaematuria investigationsUrinary cytologyInvasive testingDiagnostic accuracy of urinary cytologyMuscle-invasive bladder cancerProspective observational study of patientsMulticentre prospective observational studyObservational study of patientsPredictive valueEndoscopic tumor resectionPositive cytology resultsUpper tract imagingHigh-risk diseaseOutcomes of patientsDiagnosed bladder cancerStudy of patientsCan Renal and Bladder Ultrasound Replace Computerized Tomography Urogram in Patients Investigated for Microscopic Hematuria?
Tan W, Sarpong R, Khetrapal P, Rodney S, Mostafid H, Cresswell J, Hicks J, Rane A, Henderson A, Watson D, Cherian J, Williams N, Brew-Graves C, Feber A, Kelly J, Collaborators D. Can Renal and Bladder Ultrasound Replace Computerized Tomography Urogram in Patients Investigated for Microscopic Hematuria? Journal Of Urology 2018, 200: 973-980. PMID: 29702097, PMCID: PMC6179963, DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.04.065.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsUpper tract urothelial cancerComputerized tomography urogramBladder ultrasoundIncidence of bladderUrinary tract cancerMicroscopic hematuriaUrothelial cancerBladder cancerIncidence of upper tract urothelial cancerIncidence of urinary tract cancerRenal calculiPredictive valueUpper tract imagingDetecting bladder cancerNegative predictive valueDetect renal cancerDiagnosed bladder cancerPositive predictive valueSuspected renal calculiHematuria casesMacroscopic hematuriaRenal cancerHematuriaInvestigated patientsCystoscopyWho Should Be Investigated for Haematuria? Results of a Contemporary Prospective Observational Study of 3556 Patients
Tan W, Feber A, Sarpong R, Khetrapal P, Rodney S, Jalil R, Mostafid H, Cresswell J, Hicks J, Rane A, Henderson A, Watson D, Cherian J, Williams N, Brew-Graves C, Kelly J, collaborators O. Who Should Be Investigated for Haematuria? Results of a Contemporary Prospective Observational Study of 3556 Patients. European Urology 2018, 74: 10-14. PMID: 29653885, DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.03.008.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsUrinary tract cancerIncidence of urinary tract cancerInvestigation of haematuriaRisk of urinary tract cancerClinically significant cancerDiagnosis of urinary tract cancerHigh-risk cancerProspective observational studyIncidence of cancerSignificant cancerAge thresholdBladder cancerSmoking historyVisible bloodOlder patientsHaematuriaMale genderConsensus recommendationsPatientsObservational studyCancerPatient preferencesCancer diagnosisLack of consensusAge