Propensity-score-matched comparison of soft tissue surgical margins status between open and robotic-assisted radical cystectomy
Moschini M, Soria F, Mathieu R, Xylinas E, D'Andrea D, Tan W, Kelly J, Simone G, Tuderti G, Meraney A, Krishna S, Konety B, Zamboni S, Baumeister P, Mattei A, Briganti A, Montorsi F, Galucci M, Rink M, Karakiewicz P, Rouprêt M, Aziz A, Perry M, Rowe E, Koupparis A, Kassouf W, Scherr D, Ploussard G, Boorjian S, Sooriakumaran P, Shariat S, Urologists U. Propensity-score-matched comparison of soft tissue surgical margins status between open and robotic-assisted radical cystectomy. Urologic Oncology Seminars And Original Investigations 2018, 37: 179.e1-179.e7. PMID: 30446442, DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.10.012.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedCarcinoma, Transitional CellChemotherapy, AdjuvantCystectomyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLength of StayLymph Node ExcisionMaleMargins of ExcisionMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsPropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesRobotic Surgical ProceduresTreatment OutcomeUrinary BladderUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsConceptsSoft tissue surgical marginsRobotic-assisted radical cystectomyOpen radical cystectomyPositive soft tissue surgical marginsRARC groupSoft tissue surgical margin statusRadical cystectomyPropensity-score matchingRARC patientsOpen radical cystectomy groupImpact of surgical techniqueOpen radical cystectomy patientsNon-organ-confinedMultivariate logistic regression analysisOrgan-confined diseaseSurgical margin statusSubgroup of patientsPropensity-score-matched cohortLogistic regression analysisOncologic efficacySurgical marginsPrognostic factorsUrothelial carcinomaMargin statusSurgical technique