2024
Comparison between high-flow nasal cannula and conventional oxygen therapy in COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Wang J, Peng Y, Dai B, Hou H, Zhao H, Wang W, Tan W. Comparison between high-flow nasal cannula and conventional oxygen therapy in COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Therapeutic Advances In Respiratory Disease 2024, 18: 17534666231225323. PMID: 38230522, PMCID: PMC10798115, DOI: 10.1177/17534666231225323.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAcute hypoxemic respiratory failureHigh-flow nasal cannulaConventional oxygen therapyCOVID-19-related acute hypoxemic respiratory failureIntensive care unitHospital length of stayInvasive mechanical ventilationLength of stayIntensive care unit settingCOVID-19 patientsIntubation rateNasal cannulaMechanical ventilationOxygen therapyRatio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to fractional inspired oxygenHospital lengthArterial oxygen partial pressure to fractional inspired oxygenEfficacy of high-flow nasal cannulaIntensive care unit length of stayControlled trialsSystematic reviewRespiratory support strategiesIntensive care unit lengthHypoxemic respiratory failureMortality rate
2022
Comparison between high-flow nasal cannula and noninvasive ventilation in COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Peng Y, Dai B, Zhao H, Wang W, Kang J, Hou H, Tan W. Comparison between high-flow nasal cannula and noninvasive ventilation in COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Therapeutic Advances In Respiratory Disease 2022, 16: 17534666221113663. PMID: 35861299, PMCID: PMC9340323, DOI: 10.1177/17534666221113663.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsHigh-flow nasal cannulaAcute hypoxemic respiratory failureHigh-flow nasal cannula groupIntensive care unitClinical outcomes of COVID-19Noninvasive ventilation groupNoninvasive ventilationInvasive mechanical ventilationRandomized controlled trialsOutcomes of COVID-19Intubation rateNasal cannulaClinical outcomesCOVID-19-related acute hypoxemic respiratory failureMechanical ventilationHospital LOSPositive airway pressureHypoxemic respiratory failureMortality rateIntensive care unit LOSMeta-analysisSystematic reviewCPAP groupCOVID-19 patientsAirway pressure
2021
The efficacy and tolerance of prone positioning in non-intubation patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and ARDS: a meta-analysis
Tan W, Xu D, Xu M, Wang Z, Dai B, Li L, Zhao H, Wang W, Kang J. The efficacy and tolerance of prone positioning in non-intubation patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and ARDS: a meta-analysis. Therapeutic Advances In Respiratory Disease 2021, 15: 17534666211009407. PMID: 33888007, PMCID: PMC8071979, DOI: 10.1177/17534666211009407.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAcute hypoxemic respiratory failureAcute respiratory distress syndromeNon-invasive respiratory supportHypoxemic respiratory failureNon-intubated patientsNon-invasive ventilationRandomized controlled trialsNon-COVID-19 patientsCOVID-19 patientsRespiratory failureRespiratory supportIntubation rateReduced respiratory rateHigh-flow nasal oxygen therapyMortality rateNewcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment ScaleMeta-analysisNasal oxygen therapyRespiratory distress syndromeNon-COVID-19Supplemental material sectionCochrane Central RegisterQuality Assessment ScaleLong durationRandom-effects model