2019
Familiarity and acceptability of long-acting reversible contraception and contraceptive choice
Paul R, Huysman B, Maddipati R, Madden T. Familiarity and acceptability of long-acting reversible contraception and contraceptive choice. American Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynecology 2019, 222: s884.e1-s884.e9. PMID: 31838124, PMCID: PMC7781163, DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.11.1266.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAdultAge FactorsBlack or African AmericanChoice BehaviorContraceptive Agents, HormonalContraceptives, OralDelayed-Action PreparationsDrug ImplantsFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHispanic or LatinoHumansIntrauterine DevicesLong-Acting Reversible ContraceptionMarital StatusMedroxyprogesterone AcetateMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareRecognition, PsychologyWhite PeopleYoung AdultConceptsOral contraceptive pillsContraceptive pillsIntrauterine deviceDepo-medroxyprogesteroneContraceptive choicesReversible contraceptionDepo-medroxyprogesterone acetateHealth center populationHealthcare provider visitsHormonal intrauterine deviceHigh acceptabilityMultivariable Poisson regressionQualified health centersPreference-sensitive decisionsReversible contraception methodsCopper intrauterine deviceInterviewer-administered surveySpecific contraceptive methodsChi-square testProvider visitsContraceptive counselingContraceptive careHealth centersContraception methodsContraceptive methods
2015
Long-term utilization and continuation of intrauterine devices
Diedrich J, Madden T, Zhao Q, Peipert J. Long-term utilization and continuation of intrauterine devices. American Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynecology 2015, 213: 822.e1-822.e6. PMID: 26409157, PMCID: PMC4679676, DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.077.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsYears of ageCu-intrauterine devicesIntrauterine deviceLNG intrauterine deviceMonth continuation ratesProspective cohort studyCox proportional hazardsSubsequent contraceptive useCopper intrauterine deviceContraceptive CHOICE ProjectLess discontinuationMenstrual profileMonths continuationCohort studyHazard ratioPrimary outcomeMultivariable analysisPregnancy historyContinuation ratesContraceptive useIUD continuationDiscontinuationProportional hazardsSurvival analysisLevonorgestrel
2014
Association of Age and Parity With Intrauterine Device Expulsion
Madden T, McNicholas C, Zhao Q, Secura G, Eisenberg D, Peipert J. Association of Age and Parity With Intrauterine Device Expulsion. Obstetrics And Gynecology 2014, 124: 718-726. PMID: 25198262, PMCID: PMC4172535, DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000000475.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchAdolescentAdultAge FactorsAnalysis of VarianceChi-Square DistributionCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntrauterine Device ExpulsionIntrauterine Devices, CopperIntrauterine Devices, MedicatedKaplan-Meier EstimateLevonorgestrelMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisParityPregnancyPregnancy RateProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentTime FactorsYoung Adult
2013
Medical contraindications in women seeking combined hormonal contraception
Xu H, Eisenberg D, Madden T, Secura G, Peipert J. Medical contraindications in women seeking combined hormonal contraception. American Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynecology 2013, 210: 210.e1-210.e5. PMID: 24246525, PMCID: PMC3958945, DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.11.023.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMedical contraindicationsVenous thromboembolismHormonal contraceptionMedical historyActing reversible contraceptive (LARC) methodsTrue medical contraindicationsProspective cohort studyReproductive-aged womenAge 35 yearsCerebral vascular accidentConfidence intervalsReversible contraceptive methodsCHOICE ProjectSelf-reported historyMethod of contraceptionContraceptive CHOICE ProjectChart reviewCohort studyLiver diseaseVascular accidentMyocardial infarctionUnintended pregnancyBaseline enrollmentContraindicationsLow prevalence
2012
Effectiveness of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception
Winner B, Peipert J, Zhao Q, Buckel C, Madden T, Allsworth J, Secura G. Effectiveness of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception. New England Journal Of Medicine 2012, 366: 1998-2007. PMID: 22621627, DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1110855.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAdultAge FactorsCohort StudiesContraceptionContraceptive Devices, FemaleContraceptives, OralDrug ImplantsFemaleHumansInjectionsIntrauterine DevicesMedroxyprogesterone AcetateMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPregnancyPregnancy, UnplannedTransdermal PatchTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultConceptsUnintended pregnancyReversible contraceptionContraceptive methodsLarge prospective cohort studyActing reversible contraceptive (LARC) methodsProspective cohort studyContraceptive failure ratesReversible contraceptive methodsYears of ageLong-Acting Reversible ContraceptionDMPA injectionOverall cohortCohort studyRate of failureContraceptive pillsContraceptive failurePregnancyYoung womenContraceptionPillsOlder participantsAgeFailure rateParticipantsRisk
2011
Acceptance of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods by adolescent participants in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project
Mestad R, Secura G, Allsworth J, Madden T, Zhao Q, Peipert J. Acceptance of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods by adolescent participants in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project. Contraception 2011, 84: 493-498. PMID: 22018123, PMCID: PMC3505875, DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.03.001.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsContraceptive CHOICE ProjectIntrauterine deviceLARC methodsCHOICE ProjectActing reversible contraceptive (LARC) methodsReversible contraception useReversible contraceptive methodsAssociation of ageNon-LARC methodsAdolescent participantsUnintended pregnancyReversible contraceptionHigh riskContraception useContraceptive methodsAdolescent womenYounger groupLARCLittle dataAdolescentsWomenAgeParticipantsAssociationYears