2012
The Human Microbiome Project strategy for comprehensive sampling of the human microbiome and why it matters
Aagaard K, Petrosino J, Keitel W, Watson M, Katancik J, Garcia N, Patel S, Cutting M, Madden T, Hamilton H, Harris E, Gevers D, Simone G, McInnes P, Versalovic J. The Human Microbiome Project strategy for comprehensive sampling of the human microbiome and why it matters. The FASEB Journal 2012, 27: 1012-1022. PMID: 23165986, PMCID: PMC3574278, DOI: 10.1096/fj.12-220806.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsBody mass indexGood Clinical Practice standardsSubsequent physical examinationClinical practice standardsOral healthMass indexCutaneous lesionsSystemic diseasePhysical examinationReference cohortGastrointestinal tractExclusion criteriaOral cavityHealth historyPotential immunomodulatorClinical designBody sitesLongitudinal changesPrimary specimensPotential participantsHuman Microbiome ProjectPractice standardsIndividual microbiomesHuman microbiomeRecent use
2010
The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception
Secura G, Allsworth J, Madden T, Mullersman J, Peipert J. The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception. American Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynecology 2010, 203: 115.e1-115.e7. PMID: 20541171, PMCID: PMC2910826, DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.04.017.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAdultCohort StudiesConfidence IntervalsContraceptionContraception BehaviorContraceptive Agents, FemaleContraceptive Devices, FemaleCost SavingsCost-Benefit AnalysisDelayed-Action PreparationsDrug ImplantsFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansIntrauterine DevicesMiddle AgedPregnancyProbabilityProspective StudiesRisk FactorsTime FactorsYoung AdultConceptsContraceptive CHOICE ProjectReversible contraceptionReversible methodFirst-line contraceptive optionProspective cohort studyPercent of womenCHOICE ProjectBaseline characteristicsCohort studyWomen 14Contraceptive optionsIntrauterine contraceptionSubdermal implantsContraceptive methodsContraceptive choicesContraceptionWomenFinancial barriersPotential participantsTwo-thirdsParticipantsPercentPregnancyOptionsYears