Cost-effectiveness of meglumine antimoniate versus miltefosine caregiver DOT for the treatment of pediatric cutaneous leishmaniasis
Berger BA, Cossio A, Saravia NG, del Mar Castro M, Prada S, Bartlett AH, Pho MT. Cost-effectiveness of meglumine antimoniate versus miltefosine caregiver DOT for the treatment of pediatric cutaneous leishmaniasis. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 2017, 11: e0005459. PMID: 28384261, PMCID: PMC5404883, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005459.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdministration, OralAntiprotozoal AgentsCaregiversChildChild, PreschoolCost-Benefit AnalysisDirectly Observed TherapyDrug CostsFemaleHumansInjections, IntramuscularLeishmaniaLeishmaniasis, CutaneousMaleMeglumineMeglumine AntimoniateMonte Carlo MethodOrganometallic CompoundsPhosphorylcholineSensitivity and SpecificityTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesConceptsPediatric cutaneous leishmaniasisMeglumine antimoniateCutaneous leishmaniasisGovernment payer perspectivePayer perspectivePatient's perspectiveMean differenceSocietal perspectiveCost-effectiveness analysisSurvey of providersOral miltefosineAdverse eventsObserved therapyPrimary outcomeHealthcare utilizationClinical trialsMean costTreatment efficacyDrug effectivenessMiltefosineHome caregiversSocietal costsLeishmaniasisCureTreatment