2024
Cost-effectiveness of Enasidenib versus conventional care for older patients with IDH2-mutant refractory/relapsed AML
Alhajahjeh A, Patel K, Shallis R, Podoltsev N, Kewan T, Stempel J, Mendez L, Huntington S, Stahl M, Goshua G, Bewersdorf J, Zeidan A. Cost-effectiveness of Enasidenib versus conventional care for older patients with IDH2-mutant refractory/relapsed AML. Leukemia & Lymphoma 2024, ahead-of-print: 1-9. PMID: 39560957, DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2024.2426073.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConventional care regimensOlder patientsTreatment of older patientsIDH2 inhibitor enasidenibIncremental cost-effectiveness ratioCost-effectiveness ratioProbabilistic sensitivity analysesR/R AMLRefractory/relapsed AMLEvent-freeCost-effective treatmentEnasidenibCare regimensAMLPatientsCost-effectiveIncremental costLife yearsConventional careR/RIncremental effectSurvivalTreatment
2018
More is less, less is more, or does it really matter? The curious case of impact of azacitidine administration schedules on outcomes in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes
Shallis RM, Zeidan AM. More is less, less is more, or does it really matter? The curious case of impact of azacitidine administration schedules on outcomes in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. BMC Hematology 2018, 18: 4. PMID: 29435332, PMCID: PMC5796398, DOI: 10.1186/s12878-018-0095-2.Peer-Reviewed Reviews, Practice Guidelines, Standards, and Consensus StatementsHigh-risk myelodysplastic syndromeMyelodysplastic syndromeAcute myeloid leukemiaAdministration scheduleOverall survivalLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesAlternative administration schedulesOutcomes of patientsAlternative dosing schedulesRisk of progressionMeaningful clinical responsesAgent azacitidineAZA-001Clinical responseConventional careDosing schedulesPeripheral cytopeniasProspective studyClinical trialsHematologic disordersMyeloid leukemiaMost trialsResponse ratePatientsSystematic review