2022
The association of marital/partner status with patient-reported health outcomes following acute myocardial infarction or stroke: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
Zhu C, Tran P, Leifheit E, Spatz E, Dreyer R, Nyhan K, Wang S, Goldstein L, Lichtman J. The association of marital/partner status with patient-reported health outcomes following acute myocardial infarction or stroke: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS ONE 2022, 17: e0267771. PMID: 36378664, PMCID: PMC9665376, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267771.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsHumansMaleMeta-Analysis as TopicMyocardial InfarctionPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeResearch DesignStrokeSystematic Reviews as TopicConceptsPatient-reported outcome measuresAcute myocardial infarctionMarital/partner statusPartner statusMyocardial infarctionHealth outcomesPatient-reported health outcomesPROSPERO registration numberRisk of biasPatient-centered factorsPeer-reviewed journalsPrimary outcomeSubgroup analysisThird reviewerOutcome measuresRegistration numberLower mortalitySystematic reviewEthics approvalStrokePartner supportMale participantsInfarctionFull textOutcomes
2016
Quantifying clinical change: discrepancies between patients’ and providers’ perspectives
Dreyer RP, Jones PG, Kutty S, Spertus JA. Quantifying clinical change: discrepancies between patients’ and providers’ perspectives. Quality Of Life Research 2016, 25: 2213-2220. PMID: 26995561, DOI: 10.1007/s11136-016-1267-9.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedFemaleHealth StatusHeart FailureHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesConceptsKansas City Cardiomyopathy QuestionnairePatient-reported outcomesGlobal assessmentHealth statusPhysician assessmentClinical changesDisease-specific Kansas City Cardiomyopathy QuestionnaireChronic heart failure patientsPatient-reported health statusBaseline clinic visitKCCQ summary scoreHeart failure statusHeart failure patientsMedical record abstractionPhysicians/patientsClinic visitsFailure patientsRecord abstractionPRO scoresPatient assessmentPatient interviewsClinical significancePRO measuresUS CentersPatientsThe china patient‐centered evaluative assessment of cardiac events (PEACE) prospective study of percutaneous coronary intervention: Study design
Du X, Pi Y, Dreyer RP, Li J, Li X, Downing NS, Li L, Feng F, Zhan L, Zhang H, Guan W, Xu X, Li S, Lin Z, Masoudi FA, Spertus JA, Krumholz HM, Jiang L, Group F. The china patient‐centered evaluative assessment of cardiac events (PEACE) prospective study of percutaneous coronary intervention: Study design. Catheterization And Cardiovascular Interventions 2016, 88: e212-e221. PMID: 26945565, PMCID: PMC5215582, DOI: 10.1002/ccd.26461.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsChinaClinical ProtocolsCoronary AngiographyHealth StatusHealthcare DisparitiesHumansMedication AdherenceMyocardial InfarctionPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPatient-Centered CarePercutaneous Coronary InterventionPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesResearch DesignRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSecondary PreventionTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeConceptsPercutaneous coronary interventionPatient-reported outcomesCardiovascular risk factor controlRisk factor controlProspective studyHealth statusMedical historyLong-term clinical outcomesLong-term patient outcomesHospital-level factorsIndependent core laboratoryNationwide prospective studyLong-term outcomesPatient's medical historyHospital outcomesCoronary interventionPatient demographicsSecondary preventionConsecutive patientsMedical chartsPCI indicationPrimary outcomeClinical outcomesClinical presentationHealthcare utilization